Parse the sentence parsing. Analysis of proposals for the composition online. Syntactic analysis of a complex sentence

Parsing order

1. Determine the type of sentence according to the purpose of the statement (narrative, incentive, interrogative).

2. Determine the type of sentence by emotional coloring (exclamatory, non-exclamatory).

3. Find the grammatical foundations in the sentence and prove that it is complex.

4. Determine the means of communication of simple sentences as part of complex ones (unions, allied words, intonation) and establish the type of this complex sentence (compound, complex, non-union, sentence with different types of connection).

5. If offer compound, then characterize the semantic relations between its constituent simple ones; indicate the means of communication between simple sentences.

If the offer complex, then name the main and subordinate; indicate the means of communication between simple sentences and the type of the subordinate clause.

If the offer unionless, then determine the semantic relationships between its constituent simple ones.

If the offer with different types of communication, then highlight the semantic parts. Parse each part as a corresponding simple or complex sentence.

6. Draw up a sentence diagram and explain the punctuation marks.

Parsing Samples

1) The boat swayed on the waves playfully splashing against its sides, barely moving along the dark sea, and it played faster and faster.(Bitter).

The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, compound, consists of two simple ones, interconnected by intonation and a composing adversative conjunction but.

First simple sentence the boat swayed on the waves, playfully splashing against its sides, barely moving along the dark sea; second - it played faster and faster. The grammatical basis of the first sentence is the boat was moving, the grammatical basis of the second sentence - it played. Between simple sentences as part of a complex relation of opposition.

Between simple sentences before conjunction but a comma is put at the end of a declarative sentence - a period.

2) But then one day, on a thaw March day, when the airfield suddenly darkened in one morning, and the porous snow settled so that the planes left deep furrows on it, Alexei took off in his fighter(Field).

The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, complex, consists of four simple sentences, interconnected by intonation, allied word when And subordinating union what. The sentence has one main and three subordinate clauses: first and second relative clauses (refer to the word day in the main sentence and answer the question which one?), are interconnected by an adversarial union but; third clause of mode of action, measure and degree (refers to the combination of a verb-predicate with a demonstrative word So in the main sentence and answers the questions how? to what extent?).

This is a complex sentence with homogeneous and consistent subordination of subordinate clauses.

Subordinate clauses in the complex are separated by commas, a period is put at the end of the sentence.

Parsing Order simple sentence

1. Parse the sentence by members and indicate how they are expressed (first, the subject and predicate are parsed, then the secondary members related to them).

2. Determine the type of sentence according to the purpose of the statement (narrative, incentive, interrogative).

3. Determine the type of sentence by emotional coloring (exclamatory, non-exclamatory).

4. Find the grammatical basis of the sentence and prove that it is simple.

5. Determine the type of offer by structure:

a) two-part or one-part (definitely personal, indefinitely personal, generalized personal, impersonal, naming);

b) widespread or non-common;

c) complete or incomplete (indicate which member of the sentence is missing in it);

d) complicated (indicate what is complicated: homogeneous members, separate members, appeal, introductory words).

6. Draw up a sentence diagram and explain the placement of punctuation marks.

Parsing Samples

1) My bonfire shines in the fog(A. K. Tolstoy).

The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, common, complete, uncomplicated.

Grammar basis - the bonfire is shining my expressed by a possessive pronoun. The predicate refers to the circumstance of the place in the fog, expressed by a noun in the prepositional case with a preposition in.

Sentence outline A period is placed at the end of this declarative sentence.

2) At the end of January, fanned by the first thaw, cherry blossoms smell good. gardens (Sholokhov).

The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, widespread, complete, complicated by a separate agreed definition, expressed by participial turnover.

Grammar basis - gardens smell. The subject is expressed by a noun in the nominative case, the predicate is a simple verb, expressed by the verb in the form of the indicative mood. The subject is the agreed definition cherry expressed by an adjective. The predicate refers to the circumstance of time in the end of January, expressed by the phrase (noun + noun) in the prepositional case with a preposition in, and the circumstance of the mode of action Okay expressed in an adverb.

Sentence outline A period is placed at the end of this declarative sentence; commas in the sentence highlight the participial turnover, which, although it stands before the word being defined, is isolated, since it is separated from it in the sentence by other words.

Ways to underline members of a sentence

When parsing a sentence by members, standard underscores are used: one dash for the subject, two dashes for the predicate, a dotted line for the complement, a wavy line for the definition, alternating dots and dashes for the circumstance.

Some schools main member a one-part sentence is emphasized with three features, however, such an underlining is more common, in which the main member of the denominative sentence is marked as the subject, and the main members of other one-part sentences are marked as predicates.

When emphasizing the secondary members of the proposal, it is advisable to be guided by the following principles.

A separate member of the sentence is underlined as a single member.

Accordingly, non-isolated members should be underlined as much as possible in accordance with the questions asked of them.

Designation of words and phrases that are not members of the sentence

As is known from morphology, service parts of speech are not members of a sentence, however, during syntactic parsing, certain problems are associated with them.

Unions are not members of the proposal and are not distinguished when homogeneous members are combined, but in some cases they may be part of non-single members of the proposal.

First, x, these are comparative conjunctions as part of comparative revolutions, for example: The surface of the bay was like a mirror.

Secondly, these are unions as part of separate members of the proposal, for example: Stopping often and for a long time, we got to the place only on the third day.

Prepositions also cannot act as independent members of a sentence, but they are used as part of a prepositional case group, expressing a certain meaning together with the case form.

Therefore, it is customary to underline the preposition together with the noun to which it refers. In this case, it is necessary to pay attention to cases where the preposition and noun are separated by adjectives or participles, for example: instead of older brother. In this case, it would be a mistake to underline the preposition together with the adjective as a definition; underscore should be: instead of older brother.

Formative particles are part of compound verb forms and are underlined together with the verb both in contact and non-contact arrangements, for example: Let him call me!

Semantic (non-formative) particles are not members of a sentence, however, in school practice, a negative particle is not usually emphasized as a single member of a sentence along with the word to which it refers, for example: No smoking here. I didn't expect much help.

It is permissible not to single out both prepositions and all semantic particles.

Some teachers teach to highlight unions by circling them, and prepositions by a triangle. This distinction is not generally accepted.

Introductory words and appeals are not members of the sentence. Sometimes students enclose these components in square brackets or underline them with crosses. This is undesirable, as underlining is only used to indicate members of a sentence; it is permissible to mark these elements of the proposal by inscribing the words “introductory” or “address” above them.

Description of the complicating members of the sentence

When a sentence is complicated by direct speech or an interstitial sentence, they are considered and described as an independent sentence, since both direct speech and an interstitial sentence have their own purpose of utterance and intonation, which may not coincide with the purpose of utterance and the intonation of the sentence itself.

So, for example, the proposal He indignantly asked: “How long will you be digging?!” should be parsed as follows: the sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, common, complete, complicated by direct speech. Direct speech is an interrogative, exclamatory, two-part, common, complete, uncomplicated sentence.

The participial turnover complicates the sentence only if it is isolated. At the same time, the description should indicate the complication not by the participial turnover, but by a separate definition; in brackets is possible, but not necessarily an indication that it is expressed by participial turnover.

The comparative turnover can be any member of the sentence - a predicate ( This park is like a forest.), circumstance ( The rain poured like a bucket), complement ( Petya draws better than Anton), defining (He is almost the same as his brother). In this case, the comparative turnover can be both isolated and non-isolated. The complication causes only a separate comparative turnover, and, as in the case of participial turnover, it is necessary to indicate the complication by a separate circumstance, addition or definition.

How complicating sentence structure is also described homogeneous members, introductory words and sentences, appeals.

Some difficulty is presented by sentences with homogeneous predicates. In school and pre-university practice, it is believed that a two-part sentence in which the subject is used with several predicates is a simple sentence complicated by homogeneous predicates. In a one-part sentence, there are as many parts as there are predicates in it, with the exception of cases when homogeneous parts are presented in the structure of the predicate.

For example: I was offended and did not want to answer him- a simple two-part sentence with homogeneous predicates.

I felt embarrassed and didn't want to answer him.- difficult sentence.

I got sad and lonely- a simple one-part (impersonal) sentence with homogeneous parts of the predicate.

One-part sentences

When parsing one-component sentences, students often make various mistakes.

The first type of errors is associated with the need to distinguish between one-part and two-part incomplete sentences.

As already mentioned, we diagnose a definitely personal sentence by the form of the main member: the predicate in it is expressed by the verb in the form of 1 and 2 persons singular and plural indicative mood (in the present and in the future tense), and in the imperative mood; the producer of the action is defined and can be called personal pronouns of the 1st and 2nd person I, you, we, you:

I go, I go, but I can’t reach the forest.

The peculiarity of verb forms with a morphological feature of the 1st and 2nd person is that each of these forms can “serve” a single subject: the form with the ending -y ( go-y) - the pronoun I, the form with the ending -eat / -ish ( go-eat) - pronoun you, form with -em / -im ( go eat) - pronoun we, form with -et/-ite ( go) - pronoun you. Forms 1 and 2 of the person of the imperative mood also clearly indicate the person who is the producer of the action.

Since the morphological feature of the person is presented in the verb only in the indicated forms, sentences of a similar meaning with a predicate-verb in the past tense of the indicative mood and the conditional mood are considered two-part incomplete, for example:

He walked and walked, but never reached the forest.

In this sentence, the form of the predicate does not in any way indicate the producer of the action.

Even if it is clear from the previous context that the producer of the action is the speaker(s) or the listener(s), sentences or parts of a complex sentence without a subject with a predicate in the past tense or in the conditional mood should be characterized as two-part incomplete, since information about the producer of the action is extracted not from the sentence itself, but from the previous context, which, in fact, is an indicator of the incompleteness of the sentence or part of it; see for example the second part of the compound sentence:

I would help you if I knew how.

In indefinite personal sentences, as already mentioned, the main member is expressed by the verb in the form of the 3rd person plural (present and future tenses in the indicative mood and in the imperative mood), the past plural form of the indicative mood, or a similar form of the conditional mood of the verb. The producer of the action in these sentences is unknown or unimportant:

They call / have called / let them call / would call.

Such sentences are not indefinitely personal without a subject with a predicate in the indicated forms, in which the producer of the action is known from the previous context; see for example the second sentence in the following context:

We left the forest and tried to orient ourselves on the ground. Then we went along the path to the right.

Such sentences are also two-part incomplete.

Thus, when characterizing a sentence as a one-part definite-personal, it is necessary to remember about the restrictions on the form of the predicate; when diagnosing a sentence as indefinitely-personal, it is also necessary to take into account the meaning - an indication that the producer of the action is unknown.

Generalized personal one-part sentences do not include all one-part sentences that report an action that can be attributed to everyone and everyone, but only those in which the predicate is expressed in the form of the 2 person singular of the indicative and imperative moods or the form of the 3 person plural of the indicative inclinations:

They cut the forest - the chips fly.

However, in a generalized personal sense, definite personal sentences with the main member in the form of 1 person and impersonal sentences can also be used: What we have - we do not store, having lost - we cry; To be afraid of wolves - do not go into the forest. Nevertheless, such proposals are not usually characterized as generalized-personal.

The greatest difficulties are associated with the analysis of an impersonal sentence.

Considerable difficulty is the definition of the composition of the main members in sentences like We had a lot of fun riding this slide., i.e., in sentences that include a bunch, a nominal part and an infinitive. There are two traditions in parsing such proposals.

There is an opinion that when characterizing such sentences as impersonal or as two-part, it is not the sequence of components that is important (the infinitive at the beginning of the sentence or after the link and the nominal part), but the meaning of the nominal part of the predicate.

So, if an adverb is used in the nominal part with the meaning of the state experienced by the producer of the action (fun, sad, hot, cold, etc.), then this is a one-part impersonal sentence:

It was fun to ride this hill.
It was fun to ride this hill.

If in the nominal part a word is used with the meaning of a positive or negative assessment (good, bad, harmful, useful, etc.), then we have a two-part sentence with a subject, pronounced infinitive:

It was bad for him to smoke.
Smoking was bad for him.

According to another linguistic tradition, the characteristics of a sentence of this type depend on the word order in it, and not on the meaning of the word in the nominal part. If the infinitive comes before the link and the nominal part, then it, with a relatively free word order in Russian, denotes the subject of the message and is the subject:

Smoking was bad for him.

If the infinitive follows the link and the nominal part, then we have an impersonal sentence:

It was bad for him to smoke.

With regard to impersonal sentences, the following should also be noted: not impersonal, but two-part incomplete, it is customary to consider parts of a complex sentence in which the subject position is replaced by a subordinate explanatory or direct speech, for example:

It was heard how the gate creaked a (compare: It was heard).

"I'm lost" - flashed through my head(compare: It went through my head).

Such sentences without a subordinate clause or direct speech lose all meaning, are not used, which is the criterion for the incompleteness of the sentence. So, the sentences * It was heard or * It flashed through my head cannot be understood and are not used.

§one. What is parsing, what are its specifics

Parsing is a complete grammatical characteristic of a syntactic unit:

phrases
simple sentence
complex sentence

In syntactic analysis, it is important to be able to distinguish between units of syntax, to realize that these are units of different levels, and to understand what features each of them is characterized by. Parsing requires not confusing a phrase and a simple sentence, as well as a simple and complex sentences, and knowing how to parse each of them.

§2. What you need to know and be able to do

Syntactic parsing requires knowledge and skills.

Need to know:

what is the difference between a phrase and a sentence
what is the difference between simple and complex sentences
how the phrase is built, and what they are (view by the main word)
syntactic links of words in a phrase: agreement, control, adjunction
what features characterize the sentence: the purpose of the statement, semantic and intonational completeness, the presence of a grammatical basis
what are the sentences according to the number of grammatical bases: simple, complex
what are simple sentences in terms of their structure: two-part, one-part (nominative, definitely personal, indefinitely personal, generalized personal, impersonal)
what are complex sentences: by nature syntactic connection their parts: allied, non-union; allied: compound and complex subordinate)
what is syntactic role words in a sentence (parsing by sentence members)

Need to be able to:

determine to which syntactic units the given parsing unit belongs
highlight phrases in a sentence
find the main and dependent word in the phrase
determine the type of syntactic relationship
determine the grammatical basis of a sentence
determine the type of sentence by grammatical basis (two-part - one-part) and by the nature of the main member (for one-part sentences)
define sentence members
identify complicating components: homogeneous members, separations, introductory elements (introductory words and sentences, plug-in constructions), appeals, direct speech and citation
determine the number of parts in a complex sentence
determine the type of syntactic connection and the type of a complex sentence

§3. The order of parsing syntactic units

phrase

1. Determine the main and dependent words, highlight the main thing, put a question to the dependent from it.
2. Determine the type of phrase by the main word: nominal, verbal, adverbial.
3. Determine the type of syntactic connection: agreement, control, adjacency.

Simple sentence

1. Analyze by the members of the sentence: underline all the members of the sentence, determine what (what part of speech) they are expressed by.
2. Give a description of the purpose of the statement:

narrative
interrogative
incentive

3. Give a description of the expressed emotions and intonation:

non-exclamatory
exclamatory

4. Determine the number of grammatical bases and determine the type of sentence by their number:

simple
complex

5. Give a description of the presence of the main members:

two-part
one-component

a) one-part with the main member of the subject: denominative
b) one-part with the main member of the predicate: definite-personal, indefinitely-personal, generalized-personal, impersonal

6. Give a description of the presence of secondary members:

widespread
uncommon

7. Give a description in terms of completeness (the presence of members of the proposal that are necessary in meaning):

complete
incomplete

8. Determine the presence of complicating components:

uncomplicated
complicated:

a) homogeneous members of the proposal
b) separate members: definition (agreed - inconsistent), addition, circumstance
c) introductory words, introductory sentences and plug-in constructions
d) appeal
e) constructions with direct speech or quotation

Note:

When expressing separations with participial and adverbial phrases, as well as comparative constructions, characterize what exactly the separation is expressed

Difficult sentence

1. As in a simple sentence, define the members of the sentence.
2. As in a simple sentence, give a description of the purpose of the statement:

narrative
interrogative
incentive

3. As in a simple sentence, describe the expressed emotions and intonation:

non-exclamatory
exclamatory

4. By the number of grammatical bases (more than one), determine that the sentence is complex.
5. Determine the type of syntactic connection between parts of a complex sentence:

with allied connection
with unionless connection
with a combination of allied and allied connection

6. Determine the type of complex sentence and means of communication:

compound (: connecting, dividing, adversative, connecting, explanatory or gradational)
complex (: temporary, causal, conditional, target, consequences, concessive, comparative and explanatory, as well as allied words)
non-union (connection in meaning, expressed intonationally)

7. Determine the type of complex sentence (for example: complex with an explanatory clause).
8. Next, each part of the complex sentence is characterized (according to the scheme of a simple sentence - see the scheme for parsing a simple sentence, paragraphs 5-8)
9. Make a diagram of a complex sentence, reflecting

Parsing is one of the most difficult topics in the Russian language program. Many do not understand at all what parsing is and what it is for. It is this analysis that allows you to see the structure of the sentence, and this, in turn, increases the level of punctuation literacy. You can parse a phrase, a simple sentence and different types complex sentences.

Parsing a phrase

First, from the sentence it is necessary to isolate the phrase of interest to us from the context. Secondly, it is necessary to determine which word is the main one and which is dependent. Determine which part of speech each is. Name the type of syntactic connection inherent in this phrase (coordination, adjacency or control).

The parsing of a phrase is a relatively simple parse in the syntax section. Let's give an example of parsing the phrase "speaks well". In this phrase, the main word is "says". Says how? Complicated. "Complicated" is a dependent word. The main word "says" is a present tense verb in the indicative mood, third person, singular. "Complicated" is an adverb. The type of connection in the phrase is adjunction.

Sentence parsing

In this part of the article, we will try to explain in an accessible way what the parsing of a sentence is and what stages it consists of. Syntactic parsing of a sentence is an analysis aimed at studying the structure of a sentence and the relationships between its components. Parsing consists of several sequential operations.

Simple Sentence Analysis Scheme

It is necessary to determine what the sentence is according to the purpose of the statement. All sentences in this regard are divided into narrative, interrogative and incentive. If there is an exclamation mark at the end of the sentence, you must note this and indicate that the sentence is also an exclamation mark.
Find the grammatical basis of the sentence.
Describe the structure of the sentence. One-part - only the predicate or only the subject in the grammatical basis. In this case, indicate what kind of sentence it is: definitely personal, indefinitely personal, impersonal or nominal. A sentence can be two-part - there is both a subject and a predicate. Indicate whether the proposal is non-common or widespread, that is, whether there are additions, definitions, circumstances in the proposal. If they are (minor members), then the proposal is common; if not, uncommon. You also need to indicate whether the proposal is complete or incomplete. If incomplete, then you need to indicate which particular member of the sentence is missing in it.
Determine if the sentence is complicated or uncomplicated. Complicated is the sentence in which there are homogeneous members, applications, appeals, introductory words.
Determine what part of the sentence each word is and what part of speech they are expressed.
If there are punctuation marks in the sentence, explain their placement.

Now we will explain what the parsing of a simple sentence is, using the example of the sentence: "The girl was sunbathing on the beach and listening to music."

Narrative, non-exclamatory.
Grammatical basis: girl - subject, sunbathing - predicate, listening - predicate.
Bipartite, common, complete.
The sentence is complicated by homogeneous predicates.
The girl is the subject expressed by the noun wives. kind in units hours and them. case; sunbathed - a predicate expressed by a past tense verb in singular. hours and wives. kind; on - preposition; beach - a circumstance expressed by the noun husband. kind in units number and suggestions. case; and - connecting union; listened - a predicate expressed by the verb of the past tense in units. hours and wives. kind; music is a direct object expressed by a feminine noun in singular. number and blames. case.

Using the example of parsing a phrase and a simple sentence, we explained to you what syntactic parsing is. There are also syntactic analyzes of complex sentences.

Parsing a sentence is the most frequently asked task from school, which some people fail to do. Today I will tell you how to outwit the teacher and do everything right.

Today I will give the TOP-5 services that will help you parse the sentence into parts of speech.

All of them can perform some sort of parsing of sentences or words. Each of them has some pros and cons.

These services will be specialized for both Russian and .

And I will say right away, they do not work great on their own, but they will help you cope with most of your task.

Comparison

In the tables above, I have listed the best of the best services that can help you with your sentence parsing tasks.

If you have read the table, I suggest starting to analyze each of the services and we will start from the very last line of our list and gradually reach the leader of our TOP.

#5 Lexis Res

Using this link, you can get to this service and evaluate its work yourself: http://www.lexisrex.com/English/Sentence-Study.

What is this site? For people who study English, this is just a treasure. This page allows you to analyze English text. It can be used by a person with any level of knowledge.

This is a service that allows you to parse a sentence completely in English language. Sentences can be either simple, complex, complex or complex.

In addition to the fact that the site does this analysis of any kind of sentence, it also explains each word by meaning. That is, if you do not know the exact meaning of a word, then this resource is perfect for you.

You just need to write the text you need in the field or click the "Random sentences" button (i.e. "Random sentence"), and then click the "Analyse" button, and then you will get detailed analysis each word in a sentence: explanation of the meaning of the word, part of speech.

What are the advantages of this site over others? First of all, the service is very easy to use, you will not need to spend a lot of time to understand what's what.

Secondly, the site has a huge database that allows you to parse text of any complexity and subject matter.

In addition, the site has a huge functionality, it will be useful for many more of its features for people who are learning English.

easy-to-learn site;
there are practically no ads that would distract;
simple website interface;
huge functionality;
very good syntactic parsing.

if you do not have a satisfactory level of knowledge of the English language, it will be a little difficult to read all the explanations on the site;
words during parsing are not underlined by lines of parts of speech;
there is no adaptation of the site for the Russian language.

As you can see, the ratio of pluses and minuses allows you to call this site good, but not great, which is why it is in fifth place.

#4 Delph-in

In fourth place is a service called "Delph-in".

You can try it out at this link: http://erg.delph-in.net/logon . This site is a real monster for people who are learning English. This service allows you to have online access to LinGO English Resource Grammar (ERG).

It uses the Linguistic Knowledge Builder grammar development platform.

This interface allows you to enter a single sentence using the ERG system and visualize the parsing results in various forms.

I must say right away that the site is suitable for those who are quite experienced in English, but this site is simply great and necessary for such people.

What are the benefits of this service? First of all, this site has a better deal of analysis of the proposal for the method used by the University of Oslo, and to be precise, the Language Technology Group.

Now we will consider both the pros and cons of this service.

very flexible system of sentence parsing;
you can write proposals on a variety of topics;
An unlimited number of characters in a sentence can be used.

the first of them is that the service is difficult enough for people with a low and intermediate level of English to use;
to understand how the service works and to disassemble, to understand what's what, you need to devote a few hours to the site.

We got acquainted with the fourth position and now we will move on to the third place of our TOP.

#3 MorphologyOnline

This site is ideal for those who need to qualitatively analyze a sentence in stages, word by word, so as not to make a mistake and correctly select each part of speech for each word in the sentence being parsed.

The service is also useful in that it has a very broad description of each searched word.

What are the advantages of this service? Let's take a look at them.

First of all, it is that it is very easy to use. Its interface does not have any distracting elements, which will allow you to fully concentrate on the written information.

Also, in addition to the fact that the service indicates the part of speech of the word, it also describes the morphological analysis, which makes the analysis of the word deeper and more thorough.

This will help you never make a mistake in parsing your sentence. Also, if you want to familiarize yourself with the parts of speech in detail, you can find information on this site, which is very convenient and clearly explained.

Now let's look at the service from two sides and see both the pros and cons. Let's start on the positive side.

very simple - even the youngest user can handle it;
there are no annoying ads, which makes using the service comfortable;
deep Scan;
a huge amount of information for independent syntactic analysis of the sentence.

It is because of these minuses and pluses that the service takes only third place. Now it's time for second place.

No. 2 "Gramota.ru"

Why is this service ranked 4th? This site allows you to analyze one word at a time in all Russian dictionaries, which not only indicate the part of speech, but also explain the meaning of the searched word, synonyms, antonyms, various forms.

Here you can even find the correct stress for any Russian word.

Therefore, if you want to fully analyze the word or increase your level of knowledge of the Russian language, you can safely use this resource.

Let's take a closer look at the benefits of the site. First of all, there is a very nice interface here, everything is clear, you don’t need to look for anything. Everything you need can be seen immediately on the monitor display. The site itself has no ads.

The entire design of the site is made in simple colors, that is, from a long reading of this site, your eyes do not get so tired.

With this service, absolutely anyone can make out: from the first class to the elderly.

Since I have described all the possible pros in great detail, you can now make a whole short list and also add the negatives to see the full picture.

an easy-to-use site that will not take you much time;
nice interface;
no annoying ads;
all kinds of materials for learning the Russian language.

only one word at a time can be parsed;
the site is more focused on the general analysis of the word than on parsing.

We have reviewed and analyzed the second place in detail, and now we will move on to the leader of our TOP.

No. 1 "Goldlit"

Why did this particular service take the first place in our TOP? First of all, the site can parse the sentence, regardless of the number of characters and words.

The analysis on the site is built very conveniently. The service was created specifically for parsing sentences.

This site has a number of benefits. As mentioned, the site can analyze entire sentences, and not just by the word.

Syntactic analysis is carried out very conveniently: first, the initial forms of the word are written, then the parts of speech, then comes the grammatical analysis, and then the declension by cases.

Of all the TOP, this service has the most convenient and eye-pleasing interface.

In addition to these advantages, the site also has sections with various literature from different periods, various poetry, both Russian and foreign. The site has information about many poets, many conveniently written biographies. All this will also help you to study various literature, if you need it.

But despite all these advantages, the site also has some disadvantages. We will talk about them after we have compared all the virtues.

performs a complete analysis of the sentence, regardless of the subject, number of words and symbols;
the minimum amount of advertising, but even it does not interfere with the use of the site;
very easy to learn;
a lot of information on literature;
beautiful interface and good colors.

the absolute absence of materials on the Russian language;
the site is geared towards literature more, but still has a tool for parsing sentences.

Outcome

Let's sum up. After analyzing the whole TOP, you can understand that if you need a site for parsing sentences in Russian, I recommend you use the Goldlit resource.

Simplicity of the site, excellent analysis of the proposal, many interesting materials- these are the key factors that influenced the location of the site in our top.

It is the absolute leader in our TOP and the best online service for parsing sentences in Russian in Russian Internet networks.

This is a resource that will help you not only do your homework, but also get acquainted with various literature. Use the "Goldlit" service.