Rybnikov Yu from the lecture of the year. Rybnikov Yury Stepanovich - Unified Knowledge System

He has a neon inside him, an analyzer and a thinker... (The Strugatskys. The Tale of the Troika)

I immediately recognized this old man - he repeatedly visited our institute, and he also visited many other institutes, and once I saw him in the waiting room of the Deputy Minister of Heavy Engineering, where he was sitting first in line, patient, clean, glowing with enthusiasm. He was a good old man, harmless, but, unfortunately, he could not imagine himself outside of scientific and technical creativity.
I took the heavy case from him and placed the invention on the demonstration table. The old man, finally freed, bowed and said in a rattling voice:
- My regards. Mashkin Edelveis Zakharovich, inventor.
“Not he,” said Khlebovvodov in an undertone. - He doesn't look like him. Presumably, a completely different Babkin. One surname, presumably.
“Yes, yes,” the old man agreed, smiling. - Brought here to the public. Professor, Comrade Vibegallo, God bless him, recommended it. I’m ready to demonstrate, if it’s your desire, otherwise I stayed too long in your Colony indecent ...
Lavr Fedotovich, who was carefully examining him, put down his binoculars and slowly bowed his head. The old man hesitated. He removed the lid from the case, under which was a bulky old typewriter, took a coil of wire from his pocket, stuck one end somewhere in the bowels of the typewriter, then looked around for an outlet and, finding it, unwound the wire and stuck the plug.
“Here, if you please, the so-called heuristic machine,” said the old man. - An accurate electronic-mechanical device for answering any questions, namely, scientific and economic ones. How does it work for me? Not having enough funds and being kicked off by various bureaucrats, it is not yet fully automated for me. Questions are asked orally, and I type them out and thus bring them inside her, bring them to her attention, so to speak. Her answer, again through incomplete automation, I type again. Some kind of intermediary, hehe! So, if you like, please.
He stood behind the typewriter and flipped the toggle switch with a chic gesture. A neon light lit up in the bowels of the machine.
“Please,” the old man repeated.
“And what is that lamp you have there?” Farfurkis asked suspiciously.
The old man struck the keys, then quickly tore a sheet of paper out of the typewriter and trotted it to Farfurkis. Farfurkis read aloud:
- "Question: what does she ... um ... she has inside her for LPC?" Lepeche... Kepede, perhaps? What else is a lepeche?
“Light bulb, then,” said the old man, giggling and rubbing his hands. - We code a little. He snatched the piece of paper from Farfurkis and ran back to his typewriter. “That means there was a question,” he said, pushing the sheet under the roller. Now let's see what she says...
The members of the Troika followed his actions with interest. Professor Vibegallo beamed benevolently and fatherly, picking some rubbish out of his beard with refined and smooth movements of his fingers. Edik was in a calm, now fully conscious longing. In the meantime the old man rapped cheerfully on the keys and pulled out the sheet again.
- Here, if you please, the answer.
Farfurkis read:
"I'm inside... um... not... neon." Um. What is a neon?
- Ain seconds! - exclaimed the inventor, grabbed a piece of paper and again ran to the typewriter.
The thing went. The machine gave an illiterate explanation of what a neon was, then it replied to Farfurkis that it was writing "inside" according to the rules of grammar, and then...
F a r f u r k i s: What kind of grammar?
M a s h i n a: And our Russian team.
Khlebovvodov: Do you know Eduard Petrovich Babkin?
M ash and n a: No way.
Lavr Fedotovich: Grrrm… What will be the proposals?
Machine: Recognize me as a scientific fact.
The old man ran and typed with incredible speed. The commandant enthusiastically jumped up and down in his chair and gave me a thumbs up. Vitka, lounging, gurgled like in a circus.
Khlebovvodov (irritably): I can't work like that. Why is he dangling back and forth like tin in the wind?
Machine: In view of the desire.
Khlebovvodov: Yes, take your leaflet away from me! I'm not asking you anything, can you understand that?
M a s h i n a: Yes, I can.

Rybnikov Yuri Stepanovich

Science
Date of Birth
Citizenship	Russia
Website
FreakRank

Rybnikov Yuri Stepanovich- a freak specializing in physics and quite popular with a narrow-minded category of Internet users. Known for his invention of the RUS periodic system of electroatoms, a method for constructing the electrical structures of electroatoms, which combined physics, chemistry, electricity, RUS counting (mathematics) into a single system of Knowledge.

Completely denies the modern theory of the structure of the atom and many other modern scientific ideas. In general, his work is a typical senseless heap of incorrectly given scientific terms.

RUS is an abbreviation of the Equivalent Stable Symmetry (system) of earthlings who lived and live in free ROD in accordance with NATURE. The RUs have created, are creating and will continue to create an original, self-sufficient, self-sufficient, self-protected association of the people - the RUSS. The original way of life of tribal associations allows RUS to create the continuity of Knowledge by word of mouth. Knowledge remained in the ancestral consciousness of each relative and was passed down from generation to generation. The knowledge of nature by the RUS was carried out by non-destructive methods, which allowed the Parents to train the Creators, excluding any destructive principle in the form of creators, conquerors, and conquerors of nature. Life is given to a person by PARENTS, for life in harmony with nature, the transfer of the experience of ancestors SAVE NATURE to each subsequent generation in the GENUS of Creators. What is the voluminous knowledge of the RUS? Let us turn to the works of D.I. Mendeleev, in the article “An attempt at a chemical understanding of the world ether”, according to Democritus, who wrote about 400 years before Christ, “spirit, like fire, consists of small, round, smooth, most mobile, easily and everywhere penetrating atoms, the movement of which constitutes the phenomenon of life ". Obviously, we are talking about balls (spheres), which are absolute symmetry in nature. The ball (sphere) is an obvious infinity in which there is neither beginning nor end. The structure of balls (infinities) makes up the system of the Infinite Universe, the distribution of infinities in nature creates a system of Atoms (balls, spheres), which is distorted by science with the help of geniots (Bohr, Rezerfor, Thomson) the lie is presented to us today as a planetary model of the atom with fictitious "electrons" with a charge "-" and protons with a charge "+". At one time, "-" and "+" were invented by B. Franklin in 1798-1803. A ball (sphere) manifests itself in nature as electrically neutral (fields, charges, particles, waves, sounds, magnets, light, electroatoms, frequencies, radiations, electrical substance), etc.) depending on specific conditions, specific structures, properties, media , in any state of aggregation.

THE THEORY OF UNITY OF ELECTRICITY, ELECTROATOM, ELECTRIC SUBSTANCE, ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD RYBNIKOV 28.09.2013

Discovery of the All Genesis - the Primary Particle of Substance!

Rybnikov Yuri Stepanovich

Scientific researcher, invented, developed and introduced in the USSR powder polymer painting technology, teaches at the Moscow State technical university Radio Engineering of Electronics and Automation (MGTU MIREA), Moscow, Russia. author of the theory of "Unified electric field."

SOME FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEMS OF MATHEMATICS, PHYSICS, CHEMISTRY.

Many of us wondered why at school we memorized (crammed) the multiplication table without checking its correctness, and did not find the answer. Most of the students did not have this question, we were taught from the "diaper" to live on "faith" and this is what it led to. 2×3=6, or 2×3=2+2+2=6, although in the mathematical reference book and in the Soviet Encyclopedic Dictionary the multiplication action is written as A×B = (A×A×A×…×A) B times. Logically and according to the rules of mathematics, one should have written 2×3=2×2×2=8. It is hard to believe, but the teachers "teachers" of mathematics could not answer why there is a double interpretation and different results of the action 2 × 3 = ....?

The second example is 2×0=0, and two planes are multiplied by zero = 2self. ?, and multiply two planes by three (3) we get eight (8) planes or in the form of numbers 2sam. × 3=8self. It's scary to think that it is mathematicians who, instead of convincing calculations and proofs, operate with dogmas 2 × 3 = 6 - this is the truth!

Convincing and convincing answers to this and other problems of mathematics are for people with free thinking, capable of checking calculations according to the established rules of mathematics and sound logic of thinking, spelling, compiling and pronouncing definitions.

First, we separate numerical (digital) mathematics, where only numbers are counted, from subject mathematics, where actions are performed with objects, i.e. item count (RUS count). Secondly, in current mathematics, for some reason, we start counting from one, and not from zero (?), And we start counting the “multiplication” table on school notebooks from 2, and not from one, while we do not show multiplication by zero and unit. Thirdly, there is nothing fractional in nature, but there are only whole natural units. Fourthly, there is nothing negative and positive in nature, but there are real objects and correspondingly written figures, while positive and / or negative is a convention and / or opinion of individuals or groups of individuals.

Fifthly, the signs plus "+", minus "-", multiply "×", divide ":" cannot belong to any number and / or object, since they are symbols of action with objects and numbers. Sixth, every word must have a logical and functional continuation, i.e. action, for example: sum - sums up; multiplication - multiplies; blacksmith - forges; the reaper reaps, the accountant counts, the liar lies, the priest eats, etc. Seventh, on what basis the mathematical action summation, where the result is the sum - Σ, was REDESIGNED to the words "addition and addition", which are also denoted by the sign "+", which belongs to the word SUM - Σ. So in the handbook on page 224, the logic is replaced with a lie: “addition” of identical terms is called “multiplication”!? In the same place - "the sum Σ - 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 can be written otherwise by the expression 2 × 4, such a record is called the PRODUCT." In mathematics, the sign (symbol) "×" refers to the action of multiplication and has never been used in the action of summation. On p. 225 - “the number that is “added up” (another redefinition of the word summation for the word “added up”, which is absent in the mathematical apparatus), the first one is called the first factor”, and in the rules of summation p.191 “the numbers themselves are called summands” and "+" sign. It is impossible to call these purposeful redefinitions a mistake, it turns out that the summation action depends on which numbers (digits) we are summing up, if the summation various numbers(digits) is the sum, and the summation of the same numbers (digits) is not the sum! In the mathematics of objects, the summation of identical objects takes place, and when you try to sum up different objects, the summation action is not consistent,

That is, it is necessary to redefine objects for the same name, for example: 2 birches + 1 Christmas tree + 3 oaks must be redefined into the word "tree" and only then we get the sum 2d + 1d + 3d = 6d

The action Multiplication is denoted by the sign “×”, the number that is multiplied is called the multiplicand, the number that shows how many times the multiplier needs to be multiplied by itself is called the multiplier, i.e. 2 - multiplier ×3 -multiplier = 8 product, otherwise 2 × 2 × 2 = 8 = 23.

In the reference book on page 225 “The number that is “added up” is called the first multiplier ?? summation is considered in the summation section p.190, and not in the multiplication section. The number that shows how many equal terms are “added up” is called the second “multiplier” ??. Example 3-first multiplier × 6-second multiplier = product value, while the example shows the summation action - 3 × 6 "product" \u003d 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 (obvious summation) \u003d 18. at the same time, they add that instead of "the meaning of the work" they often say "work". Surprisingly, the summation of six "three-pointers" 3+3+3+3+3+3 (obvious summation of identical numbers) = 18 result (sum) is called a "product"!

The product is the result of multiplying n factors A × A × A ... × A \u003d P.

Section - multiplying a number by one and zero:

“The product of 7x1 means that the number 7 is “taken as a summand” once, which means 7x1=7.” Why is the number 7 “taken as a term” if it is not summed up, but multiplied. “As you can see, the value of the product is equal to the number that is multiplied by one” “The product of 1 × 7 is 1+1+1+1+1+1+1, i.e. 1×7=7", the obvious sum 1+1+1+1+1+1+1=7 is presented as a product! The product is the result of multiplying n factors A × A × A ... × A \u003d P.

While the product of one seven times - 1x7 is equal to 1, the Product is the result of multiplying n factors A × A × A ... × A \u003d P. for example: 1×1×1×1×1×1×1=1×7=17=1. - read the definition of the action degree “Degree, the product of several equal factors (for example, 24 = 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 = 16) . Who needs an obvious substitution of mathematical operations at the initial stage of education?

Reference Section - multiplying a number by zero

“The product 6x0 means that the number 6 never “adds up”, so the result of such a product will be 0.” 6×0=0. "The product of 0x6 means 0+0+0+0+0+0." The value of this “sum” is equal to zero, therefore 0 × 6 \u003d 0 ”The product is presented as“ adding up ”, and there is no such action in mathematics. 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 - the obvious amount is presented as a “product” that “adds up”. Further 0 – number and its value and functions are not defined; someone removed 0 to 10th place, so the statements and examples are unproven!

In the account of RUSs, the starting point of the account is the number (digit) 0-zero, from which the account and the choice of a new unit begin. When multiplied by zero and raised to a zero power, it automatically leads US to a new unit (1) of the account, i.e. transition to a new unit of account.

As an example, they give the supposedly “PYTHAGORUS MULTIPLICATION TABLE”, in fact, there is a SUMMATION TABLE OF THE SAME NUMBERS and it doesn’t even smell of any multiplication. When checking this, everyone who is able to check it will be convinced by a mathematical operation - SUMMATION. In addition, it is known that "Pythagorean pants are equal in all directions", i.e. the sum of the squares of the legs is equal to the square of the hypotenuse. Pythagoras considered multiplication and exponentiation A2 + B2 = C2 or A × A + B × B = C × C - someone replaced knowledge with a lie.

Section - "displacement" !! multiplication property?

"6×7=42 and 7×6=42 – 6+6+6+6+6+6+6=7+7+7+7+7+7"

6+6+6+6+6+6+6=42 is the sum of seven sixes, i.e. SUMMATION of identical numbers, but where is the multiplication, how is the action ?.

7+7+7+7+7+7=42 is the sum of six sevens, i.e. SUMMATION of identical numbers, but where is the multiplication, as an action?

Actually 6x7 means 6x6x6x6x6x6x6=67; 7×7×7×7×7×7×7=76, 67>76 read the definition of product, Product is the result of multiplying n factors A×A×A…×A =P and the degree “Power, the product of several equal factors (for example 24= 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 = 16) ., the number 2 when presented in a product is called a multiplier, and when presented in the form of a notation, the degree is called the base of the degree, the number 4 when presented in a product is called a multiplier, and when presented in the form of a notation degree is called exponent.

Some properties of the SUM should be remembered: 1. the number of units (terms) on the left side of the equality is always equal to the number of units on the right side of the equality.

2. From a change in the places of the terms, the sum of the terms does not change. When defining a mathematical action, one should pay attention to the properties of the sum, which are necessarily present as a fact.

Thus, it is OBVIOUS that in elementary mathematics, many problems are introduced by redefining words and functions, leading to a distortion of consciousness and the introduction of contradictions and errors into the norm of life.

The article Generic Volumetric Knowledge of Russians presents examples of the MULTIPLICATION (EXCITATION) and SUMMATION tables, as well as the counting rules, where the counting starts from zero, and the tables show summation and multiplication with the beginning of actions from one. The ancient account of the RUS: the choice and reduction of one in binary counting - zero-0, ruble-1, semi-1/2, quarter-1/4, octagon-1/8, pudovichok-1/16, copper-1/32, silver-1/64, golden-1/128; etc. - selection and increase of the unit: zero-0, ruble-1, pair-2, two pairs-4, four pairs-8, eight pairs-16, sixteen pairs-32, thirty-two pairs-64, sixty-four pairs-128, one hundred and twenty-eight pairs-256, two hundred and fifty-six pairs-512, five hundred and twelve pairs-1024.

Memory in a computer-bit, 2,4,8,16,32,64,128,256,512,1024 kilo bytes

TAB. MULTIPLICATIONS RUS TAB. SUMMATION RUS

P = Multiplier × Multiplier, Σ = Term + Term DEGREE = MAIN. DEGREE×INDICATOR

1x0=10=1	1+0=1
1x1=11=1	1+1=2
1x2=12=1x1=1	1+2=1+1+1=3
1x3=13=1x1x1=1	1+3=1+1+1+1=4
1x4=14=1x1x1x1=1	1+4=1+1+1+1+1=5
1x5=15=1x1x1x1x1=1	1+5=1+1+1+1+1+1=6
1x6=16=1x1x1x1x1x1=1	1+6=1+1+1+1+1+1+1=7
1x7=17=1x1x1x1x1x1x1=1	1+7=1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=8
1x8=18=1x1x1x1x1x1x1x1=1	1+8=1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=9
1x9=19=1x1x1x1x1x1x1x1x1=1	1+9=1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=10
1x10=110=1x1x1x1x1x1x1x1x1x1=1	1+10=1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=11
2x0=20=1 (2x3=23=8 is not equal to 3x2=32=9)	2+0=2 (2+3=3+2=5)
2x1=21=2	2+1=3
2x2=22=2x2=4	2+2=4
2x3=23=2x2x2=8	2+2+2=6
2x4=24=2x2x2x2=16	2+2+2+2=8
2x5=25=2x2x2x2x2=32	2+2+2+2+2=10
2x6=26=2x2x2x2x2x2=64	2+2+2+2+2+2=12
2x7=27=2x2x2x2x2x2x2=128	2+2+2+2+2+2+2=14
2x8=28=2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2=256	2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2=16
2x9=29=2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2=512	2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2=18
2x10=210=2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2=1024	2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2=20

From the tables it is OBVIOUS to the naked eye that the results of multiplication and

summation differ significantly, and with an appropriate check for logical and mathematical compatibility with the definitions of SUM-SUMMATION, with the signs "+" "-", and PRODUCT-MULTIPLICATION-RAITING TO A POWER with the sign "×", taking into account the main properties (features) do not raise doubts about the correctness of mathematical operations and results. In SES, three definitions of mathematical operations are beyond doubt, since there are no contradictions there, but in the definition

MULTIPLY introduces an obvious contradiction. Multiplication, arithmetic operation. Denoted by a dot or the sign "×" (in literal terms), U. signs are omitted. U. positive integers

(natural numbers) is an action that allows two numbers

and (multiplier) and b (multiplier) find the third number ab (product) equal to the sum of b terms ? Miracles! each of which is equal to a.

A problematic issue in mathematics is “the number (number) 0 (zero), which, by definition, is translated from the Latin nullus-none, the number 0 from the addition (or subtraction) of which to any number does not change: A+0=0+A=A ; the product of any number by zero = zero, A×0=0×A. Dividing by zero is impossible.... Based on the materials of the article Generic volumetric knowledge of RUSs, the value of the number 0 (zero) was given and is given paramount importance, which determines the unit (1), the beginning of the counting of objects and the transition to a new unit When considering the MULTIPLICATION table 1×0=10=1 and 2×0= 20=1, for example, five eggs multiplied by zero = one heel of eggs, we get a new unit (1), in numbers: it will be - (5i) × 0=(5i)0= new unit (1) one heel of eggs.

The question of the action "division" in mathematics is quite serious, if we consider that the action "division" is the opposite of the action of multiplication, then the ends do not meet, for example 2 × 2 × 2 = 8 is beyond doubt, then how, when dividing a number 8 by 3 we get 2.6 ..., i.e. we have “division” with a remainder, and therefore either the action is not “division”, or we divide incorrectly, or the statement that “division” is the opposite of multiplication does not correspond to reality. The answer can only be obtained by checking, i.e. divide 8:3 - a corner, as taught in school. Obviously, in the “corner” the number (number) 3 is summed up, and under the “corner” the number (number) 6 and the number (numbers) 18 are subtracted, respectively, from the number (number) 8 and the number (number) 20. There is no the sign of "division" ":", and hence the action itself "division". Let's check the action of multiplication for the compliance of the result, definitions and features according to the rules of ancient RUSs, for example: 5×5=55=5×5×5×5×5=

5× (1+1+1+1+1)×5×5×5=(5+5+5+5+5)×5×5×5=(25)×5×5×5=

25× (1+1+1+1+1)×5×5=(25+25+25+25+25)×5×5=

(125) × 5 × 5=

125× (1+1+1+1+1)=(125+125+125+125+125)=625×5.=625(1+1+1+1+1)=

(625+625+625+625+625)=3125. It is obvious that all the fundamental mathematical operations in this example are performed in accordance with the definitions, the main features (properties) and the obligatory compliance with the mathematical and logical foundations without contradictions.

To remove contradictions in the definition of the action of multiplication, a logical and natural justification is necessary. mathematical definition multiplication actions according to the rules of RUS. Example: 1. sum three seeds 1s + 1s + 1s = 3s “take and add (storage, capitalize)” in a box where they will be stored for 1 year, the result is both before the addition of three seeds - 3s, and after a year 3s. 2. We sum up three seeds 1s + 1s + 1s, after which we plant them in the ground and water them, the sun will warm them up and nature will begin to produce: roots first, then leaves, flowers and, at the last stage, seeds.

Having harvested and counted the seeds, we are pleased to state that there are a lot of seeds produced by nature, from the point of view of mathematical interpretation, we multiplied the seeds, and according to the knowledge of the Russians, we LIVED SMARTLY. It is obvious that the substitution (redefinition) of the ancient RUS action

LIVE SMARTLY, with the emphasis on the first letter U. The "mathematicians" tried to redefine successively in multiply with the emphasis on the letter O, and then in ADDITION, with the emphasis on the letter O; examples go above.

After the logical and mathematical proofs of the actions of the product and summation are given in full, the problem of recording mathematical actions that exclude contradictions from the very beginning remains, and this issue is being resolved. First, let's recall the symbols of the sum "Σ" and the product "P", and then we use the algebraic alphanumeric combination in full: 2Σ3=2+2+2=6; in words - sum up two three times equals six! 2P3=2×2×2=8; in words - two to produce (multiply) three times is equal to eight. Thus, all contradictions and problems in the foundation are removed. primary education, mathematics.

An illustrative example, as a consequence of mathematical and other redefinitions and substitution of meaning, is obvious on the Periodic system (PS) of D.I. Mendeleev. In 1905-1906 DI. Mendeleev introduced the ZERO PERIOD and the ZERO SERIES into his PS and put the chemical element under the symbol “X” in the zero row of the zero period and the chemical element “Y” in the zero row of the first period. After the death of D.I. they were withdrawn from the PS by someone, the zero period was excluded by someone, and the zero row was rearranged by someone into the eighth, without the “Y” element. In the Rusov PS, the Vserod electroatom (electrochemical element, "X" according to Mendeleev) is in the zero row of the zero period, and the total electroatom inert HYDROGEN H RUS 2 (electrochemical element, "Y" according to Mendeleev) is in the zero row of the first period. When distributing (arranging) electroatoms according to the volumetric electric density, the PS of RSSs is described in the binary count of RSSs, i.e. PS self-organized calculated! From the school bench We were taught that it is impossible to build a model of an atom without gaps from three balls, and therefore it was necessary to come up with a necessary, some kind of medium that fills the voids between atoms, which was called ETHER. It turned out that with sufficient volumetric vision or the ability to design objects in volume, it is possible to build - Fig3. It turned out that the task of building a model of the atom without gaps was solved long ago by the ancestors of the RUSs and was “lost” by someone, and any attempts to restore the ancient design of electroatoms and PS are met with stone walls from all interested parties from science, education, journal editors, and most scientists who have been brought up and trained in Western terms and the theories that have been promoted in abundance, are and will continue to be promoted by Western scientists and their untenable theories through power structures.

PERIODIC SYSTEM according to which we are taught,

as if PS D.I. MENDELEEV

Fig 1

When considering Figure 2 PS D.I. Mendeleev reveals that the chemical element Hydrogen "H" is only third in order, and this strikes at the Nobel laureates with their theories and "discoveries". In 1912 E. Rutherford first used the term "nucleus" and, that is why we were taught to call it the Rutherford-Bohr planetary model. However, for the first time in 1901, the French scientist Jean Perrin, and not Rutherford, in the article "Molecular Hypotheses" expressed his hypothesis "a positively charged nucleus is surrounded by negative electrons that move in certain orbits" - this is how the structure of the atom is presented in any modern textbook ". However, these models of atoms and PS did not succumb to physical and mathematical calculation and the models were archived, except for the alleged Rutherford model, and the name of Rutherford, as if the developer, remained. But the most interesting thing is that the conventions "+" and "-" were introduced by B. Franklin in 1798-1800. in the study of friction processes, sending physics to a dead end solid body and electricity, and in 1897 J. Thomson and, no matter how dependent on him, Emil Wiechert never discovered a negative charge - an electron, since there is nothing negative in nature, and when studying X-rays, J. Thomson simply suggested, and together they, as it were, simultaneously "clearly established that the mass of a negatively charged electron is 1/1837 of the mass of a hydrogen atom."

PERIODIC SYSTEM D.I. Mendeleev1905-1906

Fig.2

When checking the correctness of the distribution chemical elements in the second period of the Periodic system according to the atomic weight in Ne, Li, Be, B, C, N, O, F, - it turns out that the atomic weight of the metals Li, Be under normal conditions is less than that of the gases N, O, F, which contrary to experiments and common sense.

There are 255 electroatoms in the PS RUS, eight of which have an electrical structure that is different from the rest of the electroatoms and therefore they are called inert (the most stable in the period).

From an isoteric point of view, the PS of the RUSs shows that, as it were, the lost knowledge of antiquity is the Volumetric knowledge of the RUSs.

A non-nuclear model in the form of a nesting doll of RUS from eights "THREE All-kind All in ONE".

The main module SHAR-POWER is a single electroatom VSEROD Vs.- "X".

Binary module RUS 2 - total electroatom inert HYDROGEN H - "Y"

Symbols of the main Religions: YIN-YANG, CRESCENT, PAVEL, UMBRELLA, BALL are included in the periodic system of RUS and show the unity of all major earthly Religions. When projecting the main symbols of Religions onto a plane, all of them are components of the nuclear-free model of the total ELECTROATOM - inert HYDROGEN H (RUS-2), "Y" according to Mendeleev.

This method of constructing the electrical structures of electroatoms combined physics, chemistry, electricity, electrical substance, counting RUSs (mathematics) into a single system of Knowledge, without contradictions, and removed the problem of the Unified Field Theory.

PERIODIC TABLE OF ELECTROATOMS RUS

Fig 3

Periodic system of RUSsectional version.

Horus-Oh, according to Greek and Egyptian data, was the last antediluvian divine king of the whole world and the first king of the North. S. V. Zharnikova. UNDER KING PEA...OR THE HOLY LANGUAGE OF EGYPT. In the Russian language there is a constant reference to the ancient time, mythical, but nonetheless real - "under Tsar Pea." The term still exists only in Belarusian and Little Russian dialects. He is also mentioned in the fairy tale "About the Three Kingdoms". ancient time are clearly characterized by the presence of milky rivers with jelly banks. But why the king is called Peas is not clear. Meanwhile, what is given name , testifies to the presence of the name of his queen - Anastasia (returned to life). Some modern experts suggest that the whole thing is a subtle folk joke. But Tsar Pea is mentioned in Russian tales recorded, like epics, in the Russian North. These legends have never belonged to a folk joke. Academician Boris Aleksandrovich Rybakov writes: “The tales about Kotigorokh, the legends about Kuzmodemyan and the tales “About the Three Kingdoms” should be attributed to the ancient period ... The time of the Tsar-Pea is, obviously, the time of the first Cimmerian raids, when the settlements of the Chernoles tribes, which were not yet fortified, were burned the first attacks of the steppes around the 10th century. BC e." V. Ya. Propp was right when he wrote that fairy tales should be compared according to their “component parts”, according to “stable elements”, which, in his opinion, are the functions of characters. But an independent element, stable in itself, can be not only functions, but also the names of heroes, their origin, the circumstances of the place. The East Slavic fairy tale in the form in which it was recorded by folklorists of the 18th - 20th centuries is not adequate to its distant epic proto-original, since these elements of it, at the behest of later storytellers, moved outside and this made it difficult to reconstruct the original appearance of each individual work ... heroes of a different type: Mountain-Gorovik (Gorynya, Vertogor, Pereverni-Gora), Dub-Dubovik (Verni-Dub, Dyboder, etc.) and Usynya (Verni-Water, Lock-Water, etc.). These are giants of titanic strength, moving mountains, uprooting oaks and damming rivers with their mustaches. Giants appear in various tales, but are "quite typical of tales of the three kingdoms". It is difficult to say from what depths of primitiveness these images of titans come, invented by folk fantasy to facilitate the actions of the protagonist, the serpent fighter. This is not the personification of the forces of nature, since there is neither earth, nor wind, nor sun ... In the same way, it is difficult to determine which fairy-tale complex they originally belonged to, since they are found both in fairy tales about Peas and where they act three brothers... And indeed, our brothers-heroes, setting off for a foreign country, travel along the "wild steppe", get to the blue sea, walk along the shore and, in the end, find themselves at the foot of the highest mountain or at some kind of abyss, gorge leading underground. Then a stable plot begins, sometimes determining the name of the whole fairy tale: "Three kingdoms - copper, silver and gold." Yu.M. Sokolov calls it "the most popular fairy tale of the Russian oral tradition", numbering 45 only Russian versions (not counting Ukrainian and Belarusian ones). I will use his brief retelling of the main scheme of the fairy tale about the three kingdoms: “Heroes go in search of the disappeared princesses ... Three kingdoms can be not only underground, but also on the “highest mountain”. However, in any case, whether we are talking about an abyss or a mountain, the difficulties of vertical movement remain, and the hero descends or climbs with the help of ropes, panels held by his brothers. After overcoming this mountain obstacle, the battle of Svetovik-Svetozar with the Serpent (necessarily many-headed) takes place and the mother of the hero and the beautiful princesses of the three kingdoms are released. Here, after reaching the main goal of the heroic campaign, the brothers try to kill him or leave him in the dungeon, cutting the rope on which they pulled him out into the world. Having overcome the insidiousness of the brothers, Svetozap eventually receives the golden kingdom and his princess, and his brothers - silver and copper. Boris Aleksandrovich Rybakov relates the time of Tsar-Pea to the era of the 10th century AD, and the entire semantic series of the fairy tale "Three Kingdoms - copper, silver and gold" to the era of the primary development of metal and agriculture, that is, the Neolithic-Eneolithic . It would seem that finding the source for the image of the King Pea at that distant time was an impossible task. But it's not. And to solve it, we must turn to ancient Egypt. Despite centuries of attempts to classify the ancient Egyptian language, this has not been successful. In his study, T. Benfey showed the proximity of the Egyptian language to the Semitic in the field of morphology and proposed to divide the Semitic languages into two groups, one of which was to include Egyptian and other languages of North Africa. E. Renan reacted sharply negatively to this point of view. He argued that the facts cited by T. Benfey were accidental and objected to the definition of the Egyptian language as Semitic. "According to the genealogical classification of languages (i.e. classification by kinship), the Egyptian language is classified as a Semitic-Hamitic language." “In linguistics, attempts have been repeatedly made to bring the Egyptian language, and even the Semitic-Hamitic languages in general, with the languages of other groups, primarily African ... Until now, attempts have been made to prove the connection of the Semitic-Hamitic languages, in particular Egyptian, with the Indo-European languages.” As a result of the study, by the beginning of the 21st century, linguists came to the conclusion: “The ancient Egyptian language is the language spoken by the ancient Egyptians who inhabited the Nile Valley north of the first of the Nile rapids. Forms one of the branches of the Afroasian languages, called Egyptian. It has a number of similarities in phonetics and morphology with the Semitic branch of the Afroasian family, in connection with which some authors attributed it to the Semitic. Another fairly popular point of view was to recognize him as an intermediate link between the Semitic, Berber-Libyan and Cushite branches. Such a controversial result was to be expected, because linguists tried to classify under the guise of one unchanging language - various languages \u200b\u200bthat existed and changed for three thousand years. “Over many centuries, the grammar and vocabulary of the language have changed a lot, and the speech of the Egyptians of the era of Roman rule was no longer similar to the speech of the times of the reign of the first dynasties.” “Sources report that the inhabitants of Northern and Southern Egypt did not understand each other in ancient times, and the Coptic language retained several dialects. The most significant were the differences in vowels. It should be noted that, as a rule, linguists consider only the Middle Egyptian language. This term here refers to the language literary works Middle Kingdom. This can be partly justified by the fact that among the Egyptians themselves, the Middle Egyptian language was considered classical even in the periods after the Middle Kingdom. Language ancient kingdom, and even earlier era is unknown. However, linguists believe that "the art of writing in Egypt has always remained the prerogative of a conservative and traditional stratum of scribes, which limited the degree of influence of colloquial speech on mdw nTr -" the word of god ". Hieroglyphic writing in Egypt was called mdw nTr - "divine speech". “Writing in Egypt arises in very ancient times: by the beginning of the 1st dynasty (i.e., apparently, in the second half of the 4th millennium BC), its system was mainly formed, which existed without significant changes for several millennia ... Consequently, the use of hieroglyphics covers at least 3.5 thousand years, despite all the changes over this long period in the vocabulary of the language and in grammatical structure . Such a long period of use of hieroglyphics shows that the Egyptian writing system in its first descriptive form - hieroglyphics fully justified itself as a means of communication and was relatively easy for native speakers ... One should be surprised not at the primitiveness of the Egyptian writing system, but at its development in the period before the unification of Egypt into one state at the turn of the 4th and 3rd millennia. Academician Struve showed that alphabetic writing existed in Egypt along with syllabic, and not as a stage of its "development" to "higher" alphabetic forms. It was intended to record foreign words with the same signs and to explain Egyptian words to foreigners. They developed an alphabet for all the consonants of their language, but their writing system never became purely alphabetic or even purely sound. At the same time, three writing systems were used in Egypt, two for the language of the priests and one for the people. “In Egypt, he lived with the priests, mastered all their wisdom, learned the Egyptian language with its three alphabets - written, sacred and symbolic. The first of them depicts ordinary language, and the other two - allegorical and mysterious). The priests teach their children two kinds of writing: that which is called "sacred" and that which is used in general education...' (Diodorus Siculus). According to legend, at the beginning of its history, the first kings of Egypt were celestials, with them came to Egypt "divine speech", hieroglyphs, the beginning of culture and agriculture. "fourteen. First of all, Osiris, they wrote, delivered mankind from cannibalism; for after Isis discovered the fruits of wheat and barley, which grew uncultivated on the earth along with other plants, but were not yet known to people, and when Osiris also thought of growing these fruits, all people were glad to change their food, and due to the pleasant nature newly opened grain and because it was in their best interest to refrain from beating each other." (Diodorus Siculus) Between 14 and 10 ka e. Egypt experienced a period of so-called "premature agricultural development". At 13 k.d. e. among the finds of Paleolithic tools, stone millstones and sickles appear, millstones were used for cooking plant foods. Pollen samples suggest that the relevant cereal was barley. But shortly after 10,500 B.C. e. sickles and millstones disappear; their place throughout Egypt is taken by the stone tools of hunters, fishermen and gatherers of the Upper Paleolithic. The Egyptians claim that the founder of the philosophy kept by the priests and prophets was Hephaestus (Ptah), the son of the Nile; 48,863 years passed from him to Alexander the Great, and during this time there were 373 solar eclipse and 332 lunar". (Diogenes Laertes). “13. Helius was the first king of Egypt, his name is the same as that of the heavenly body. 26. The Egyptian priests, counting the time from the reign of Helius to Alexander's crossing into Asia, say that the rounded figure was twenty-three thousand years. And, as the legends say, the most ancient of the gods ruled for more than a thousand two hundred years, and later ones for at least three hundred. 23. They say that the number of years from Osiris and Isis to the reign of Alexander, who founded the city in Egypt that bears his name, is more than ten thousand, but, according to other authors, a little less than twenty-three thousand ... 44. Some say that at first Egypt was ruled by gods and heroes for almost eighty thousand years (an option is eighteen thousand years), and Horus, the son of Isis, reigned last among the gods. People are said to have ruled the country since Merida for almost five thousand years until the one hundred and eightieth Olympiad, when we visited Egypt ... The priests had records of all of them in their sacred books, which they always passed on to their successors from ancient times ... 45. According to legend, after the gods, the first king in Egypt was Menas ... ". (Diodorus Siculus) “They were the first to hold power in Egypt. Subsequently, royal power passed without interruption from one to another ... for 13,900 years ... After the gods, demigods ruled for 1255 years; after them another line reigned for 1817 years. Then the next thirty kings ruled for 1790 years, and then ten - 350. Then followed the reign of the spirits of the dead ... which lasted 5813 years ... ". (Eusebius Pamphilus). The Egyptians claim that they are the most ancient people . In their reliable chronicles it is reported that before Amasis, three hundred and thirty kings ruled. The antiquity of these chronicles is determined by a figure of more than thirteen thousand years. From the chronicles it follows that during the existence of the Egyptians, the constellations changed their path four times, and the sun set twice where it now rises. (Pomponius Mela). Julius Africanus in his "Historiography" attributed the appearance of Egypt to 9500 BC. “Indeed, the Egyptians, proud of their ancient origin, with the help of astrologers, compiled their calendar, dividing time into cycles. Those who have earned a reputation as wise men who are knowledgeable in this matter have learned to calculate by lunar years, and, being no less inclined to believe legends and myths than others, believe that their people appeared eight or even nine thousand years before the reign of Solon (about even Plato says so). (Julius African). “About Hercules, I heard that he belongs to a host of twelve gods ... But Hercules is an ancient Egyptian god, and, as they themselves say, 1700 years elapsed before the reign of Amasis from the time when twelve arose from a host of eight gods (the first generation). gods, one of which they consider Heracles. (Herodotus). Manetho mentions three clearly defined epochs before Menes: the reign of the god Horus, the reign of the demigods, which came after the reign of Horus; this reign lasted 15,150 years; then pre-dynastic rule, which lasted another 13,777 years; this added up to 28,927 years from Horus to Menes. According to Eusebius, the reign of the gods lasted 13,900 years, while the demigods ruled for 11,000 years. The Canon of Dynasties of Eusethia begins the first dynasty in 5483 BC. George Sinkell dates the first (antediluvian) dynasty to 6200-5000 BC, and the first post-Flood dynasty from 4955 BC. Sinkel's Canon of 1729 dates it to 2724 BC, and the Greek version to 1789 BC. Athanasius Kircher dates the first (antediluvian) dynasty to 2954-2030 BC. James Ussher dated the emergence of the Egyptian state to 2188 BC. There is another version of the chronology that refers to Manetho: at first, for 12,300 years, seven great gods ruled Egypt: Ptah - 9000 years, Pa - 1000 years, Shu - 700 years, Geb - 500 years, Osiris - 450 years, Seth - 350 years and Horus - 300 years. In the second dynasty of the gods, there were 12 divine rulers - Thoth, Maat and ten others - they ruled the country for 1570 years. The Third Dynasty consisted of 30 demigods who ruled for 3650 years. The fourth period, which lasted 350 years, was a period of chaos when Egypt was divided. This period ended with the unification of Egypt under Menes. The sources say that the period between the reigns of Osiris and Menes, during which the Egyptian throne was occupied by gods or demigods, was extremely long. The Turin papyrus gives 23,200 years to the predecessors of the Shemsu-Gor, and 13,420 years to the Venerable Shemsu-Gor themselves. Thus, the total duration of the period is 36,620 years. It should be noted that the rule of the gods is not included in this period. From the surviving fragments about the third era preceding Menes, it can be established that nine dynasties were mentioned in the document, including "Venerables from Memphis", "Venerables from the North" and, finally, Shemsu-Gor, who ruled until Menes. At the same time, as the Egyptians believed, the knowledge of the priests was obtained, geometry, writing were invented, and a common language was adopted. "13. ... the Egyptians called the gods Horus, Isis, Osiris and the like, who were also people. According to the wealth of wisdom, boasting of the invention of geometry, astronomy and arithmetic ... ". (Eusebius of Caesarea). "16. For example, this Hermes, in their opinion, was the first to carefully work out the universal language, and that many objects that were still nameless received a name, that he invented the alphabet ... ”((Diodorus Siculus)). “... They believe that the world is spherical, that it is born and mortal; that the stars consist of fire, and this fire, tempering, gives life to everything that is on earth; that lunar eclipses occur because the moon falls into the shadow of the earth; that the soul outlives its body and transmigrates into others; that rain comes from transformed air; these and their other teachings about nature are reported by Hecataeus and Aristagoras. And in their concern for justice, they established their own laws and attributed them to Hermes (Thoth) himself. Animals useful to man are considered gods; they are also said to have invented geometry, astronomy, and arithmetic. This is what is known about the discovery of philosophy. (Diogenes Laertes). It can be assumed that the sacred speech and ordinary language in Egypt were similar. But the priesthood in Egypt had its own everyday features, not typical for the local population. "However, most people do not understand even the most well-known and insignificant rules: why the priests remove their hair and wear linen clothes." (Plutarch). “The Egyptians are the most God-fearing people of all, and their customs are as follows... Priests wear only linen attire and shoes made of bast (bast shoes?). They are not allowed to wear other clothes and shoes ... The priests do not even tolerate the sight of beans, considering them unclean fruits. (Herodotus). At the same time, the Mediterranean and, in particular, Egypt are believed to be the birthplace of beans. Edible beans (Faba bona) grew throughout Egypt. The ban on the use of beans by the priests finds a rational explanation in their properties. Do not eat raw and unripe beans, as this will lead to the destruction of blood cells. Beans contain the cytogenetic glycoside phaseolunatin. Incorrectly cooked beans can cause poisoning. Experienced chefs advise pre-soaking the beans for 4-5 hours in cold water, then boil for 1-2 hours. Otherwise, toxins remain that can cause poisoning, accompanied by vomiting, yellowing of the sclera. Purines, which are rich in beans, can harm people suffering from acute nephritis, gout, heart failure, thrombophlebitis, diseases of the stomach and pancreas. Beans came to Russia from Western Europe after the 10th c. To the north of the 60th parallel, the beans do not ripen, to the south they give normal fruits. It is not surprising that it was in the North that the beans considered poisonous did not become widespread. The Egyptians also believed that Osiris and Isis taught them how to grow the fruits of wheat and barley. But these are plants of the North, long daylight hours, not typical for the latitudes of Egypt. Moreover, ancient authors noted the wealth of the country with wild food. “10. Now the Egyptians have something like this story: When the Universe was born, the first people appeared in Egypt, and due to the favorable climate of the country and the strength of the Nile. For this stream, since it produces a variety of life and provides a spontaneous supply of food, easily provides for all generated living beings; reed root and lotus, as well as Egyptian beans and the so-called corsium and many other similar plants, supply the human race with food ready for use. ((Diodorus Siculus)). All this suggests that the "universal language" of Hermes, as the "sacred letter" of ancient Egypt, could be brought from other countries. Is there a connection here with the Tsar-Pea of Russian fairy tales? According to Egyptian and Greek sources, Horus, the son of Isis, was the last of the gods to rule Egypt. After him, the throne of Egypt was occupied by several dynasties (seven according to the Turin papyrus, four according to Eusebius) of demigods. Then came to power those whom the Turin papyrus calls "Spirits, Servants of Horus" (Akhu, Shemsu-Hor). Egyptian tradition regards these rulers as the immediate forerunners of historical dynasties. The Turin papyrus gives information about the divine dynasties. One fragment has been preserved almost completely. It indicates the King of Upper and Lower Egypt, Horus, Life, Health, Strength, 300 years and the last king of the dynasty - the King of Upper and Lower Egypt, Horus. Manetho leads a dynasty of seven kings from Hephaestus to Horus, the son of Isis. The second divine dynasty according to Sincellus included Horus, the son of Isis and Apollo (Horus of Behdet). George Sinkell pointed to the reign of Horus (Orus) in 5214-5189 BC. Athanasius Kircher placed the reign of Horus-That in 2046-2030 BC. Diodorus Siculus pointed out: “25. And it seems that Horus, the last of the gods, was king after his father Osiris left the people. In addition, it is said that the name of Horus in translation is Apollo, and that, having received training from his mother Isis in medicine and divination, he now benefits the human race with his prophecies and healings. The third dynasty of Manetho consisted of deified heroes. Perhaps this third dynasty numerically corresponded to the third Heliopolis Nine, which included "the children of Horus, the son of Isis, the god Buto" and "the children of Horus Khentikheti, the god Athribis." That is, this is the Neolithic-Eneolithic era, with which the creation of the epic about the three kingdoms is associated. It is assumed that under the King of Northern and Southern Egypt, Gebe, the country was divided. Geb tells Horus and Seth: "I gave you my shares, Southern Egypt to Seth, and Northern Egypt to Horus." “Geb gave his allotments to Seth and Horus. He forbade them to fight. He appoints Set as king of the South in Upper Egypt, in the place where he was born, in Su. Geb then establishes Horus as king of the North in Lower Egypt, the place where Horus' father drowned, thus dividing the land. Then Horus and Set reign each in their own territory. They grant peace to two countries in Tours, at the border of two countries ... Since that time, Horus and Seth live in peace. The two brothers have united and are no longer at odds. They border at Het-Ka-Ptah (Memphis), this is the place of balance between the two countries.” Horus the Elder, the first king of Northern Egypt, ruled in Letopolis (the city of Lethe) and Seth, the first king of Southern Egypt in Nubt (Ombos, Kom-Ombou), located fifty kilometers from Aswan. Horus ruled wisely and fairly, but Set, on the contrary, badly and unfairly. Geb expressed discontent, took away the kingdom from Set and gave it to Horus. The kings of the North called themselves the heirs and successors of Horus, the son of Isis, they can be considered the early "Servants of Horus" The Turin Papyrus remembers the "nineteen kings of the White Walls and the nineteen Great North", the predecessors of the Servants of Horus. There is no mention of the kings of the South. Then "Akhu-Hor" from Letopol conquer Southern Egypt and in it are divided into kings of the North and kings of the South. Having become the lords of the Delta, they made Buto their capital. The second branch of these Followers of Horus, having settled in the South, created an exact copy of the kingdom in the upper valley. In the last stage, the heirs of Horus united the two kingdoms. Egyptian and Greek sources agree that after the gods and the Servants of Horus, the throne of Egypt was occupied by Menes, the first king of a united Egypt and the founder of an earthly dynasty of kings. The official title of the kings included: 1) the title of Horus, 2) the title of the king wearing the Two Crowns, 3) the title of the king of Upper and Lower Egypt Each of these titles could be supplemented by the name that the king wore. The title of Horus consists of a name such as Aha, "Warrior", inscribed on a diagram of a royal palace with a Falcon seated on top. This means that the king is the incarnation of the Falcon-Horus (Apollo) on earth. Thus, the name of the king of united Egypt during the first dynasty, as well as the last king of the divine dynasty, sounded like Horus-Ah (Horus-Warrior) or in the version of Horus preserved by the Greeks. Oh (Gor-Sword). In addition, researchers believe that Egyptian scribes did not indicate vowel sounds in writing. “The researcher of the Old Egyptian, Middle Egyptian, New Egyptian and partly Demotic language is in the position of a paleontologist who restores the appearance of a fossil creature from its skeleton. Egyptologists have to deal only with the written "skeleton" of words written with only consonants. Horus was not only the last king of the divine dynasty of all Egypt, but also the first king of Northern Egypt. But could he be related to the Russian epic? The country that historians call Ancient Egypt was itself called the country of Kemi (Kem). In the same way, among the Old Believers, the country in the north of modern Finland and Karelia was called - the country of Kemi (Kem), the famous "Kemsk volost", which the Swedes unsuccessfully sought. To what Ancient Egypt consisted of remote parts, historians also pointed out. Ekkehard of Aura writes: “At the same time, the Argonauts lived, who, together with Jason, went to Colchis to steal the Golden Fleece. Then Laomedon ruled in Troy, and after him - his son Priam, under whom Troy was taken. At the same time, Vesoces, the king of Egypt, seeking either to unite by war or unite by power the north and south of the country, separated almost like heaven and earth, was the first to declare war on the Scythians, sending ambassadors in advance to convey to the enemies the conditions of submission. The Scythians, however, answered the ambassadors that the most powerful king in vain started a war against the poor people, which he himself should rather be afraid of because of variable successes; in view of the unclear outcome of the war, gains will be negligible, and losses will be obvious. Further, in order not to wait until he comes to them, they themselves decided for the sake of booty, went out to meet him. And without hesitation, they began to carry out what was said; first they forced the terrified Vesoces to flee to their kingdom, and then attacked the army abandoned by him, seized all the military equipment and would have ravaged all of Egypt if they had not been detained by the swamps of the Nile. Immediately returning from there, they conquered all of Asia in the course of countless wars. They were those who were later called Getae or Goths, and who were thus the first to come out of Scythia at that time. Other authors specify that Vesotses reached the northern limits of Colchis, Tanais and Thrace, so that the north of the country (Kemi) should have been even further away. The fragment of the Egyptian legend “13. Some priests, however, say that Hephaestus (Ptah) was the first king, since he was the discoverer of fire and received power for this service to mankind, when lightning once struck a tree in the mountains and the forest around it caught fire, Hephaestus approached him, for this it was winter, and he was very fond of warmth; when the fire subsided, he continued to add fuel, while maintaining the fire, and this way to enjoy the advantage that came from him, he offered to the rest of mankind ... Then Cronus became the ruler ... ”(Diodorus Siculus). Although theoretically a cold winter forest is also possible in the Nile Valley, this is more consistent with the situation in the North, especially during the interglacial period. In addition, Kron was never connected with the south and always only with the North, the Kronian Ocean is the North and White Seas.

SOME FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEMS OF MATHEMATICS, PHYSICS, CHEMISTRY.

Moscow State Institute of Radio Engineering, Electronics and Automation. (MIREA), Moscow, Russia

Many of us wondered why at school we memorized (crammed) the multiplication table without checking its correctness, and did not find the answer. Most of the students did not have this question, we were taught from the "diaper" to live on "faith" and this is what it led to. 2×3=6, or 2×3=2+2+2=6, although in the mathematical reference book and in the Soviet Encyclopedic Dictionary the multiplication action is written as A×B = (A×A×A×…×A) B times. Logically and according to the rules of mathematics, one should have written 2×3=2×2×2=8. It's hard to believe, but teachers "teachers" of mathematics could not answer why there is a double interpretation and different results of the action 2 × 3 = ....?

Fifthly, the signs plus "+", minus "-", multiply "×", divide ":" cannot belong to any number and / or object, since they are symbols of action with objects and numbers. Sixth, every word must have a logical and functional continuation, i.e. action, for example: sum - sums up; multiplication - multiplies; blacksmith - forges; the reaper - reaps, the accountant - counts, the liar lies, the priest - eats, etc. Seventh, on what basis the mathematical action summation, where the result is the sum - Σ, was REDESIGNED to the words "addition and addition", which are also denoted by the sign "+", which belongs to the word SUM - Σ. So in the handbook on page 224, the logic is replaced with a lie: “addition” of identical terms is called “multiplication”!? In the same place - "the sum Σ - 2+2+2+2 can be written otherwise by the expression 2 × 4, such a record is called the PRODUCT." In mathematics, the sign (symbol) "×" refers to the action of multiplication and has never been used in the action of summation. On page 225 - “the number that is “added up” (another redefinition of the word summation for the word “added up”, which is absent in the mathematical apparatus), the first one is called the first factor”, and in the rules of summation p.191 “the numbers themselves are called terms” and "+" sign. It is impossible to call these purposeful redefinitions a mistake, it turns out that the summation action depends on which numbers (numbers) we are summing up, if the summation of different numbers (numbers) is a sum, and the summation of identical numbers (numbers) is not a sum! In the mathematics of objects, the summation of identical objects takes place, and when you try to sum up different objects, the summation action is not consistent,

In the reference book on page 225 “The number that is “added up” is called the first multiplier ?? summation is considered in the summation section p.190, and not in the multiplication section. The number that shows how many equal terms are “added up” is called the second “multiplier” ??. Example 3-first multiplier × 6-second multiplier = product value, while the example shows the action of summation - 3×6 "product" \u003d 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 (obvious summation) \u003d 18. at the same time, they add that instead of "the meaning of the work" they often say "work". Surprisingly, the summation of six "three-pointers" 3+3+3+3+3+3 (obvious summation of identical numbers) = 18 result (sum) is called a "product"!

The product is the result of multiplying n factors A × A × A ... × A \u003d P.

Section - multiplying a number by one and zero:

Whereas the product of one seven times - 1x7 is equal to 1, the Product is the result of multiplying n factors A × A × A ... × A \u003d P. for example: 1×1×1×1×1×1×1=1×7=1 7 =1. - read the definition of the action degree “Degree, the product of several equal factors (for example, 2 4 \u003d 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 \u003d 16) . Who needs an obvious substitution of mathematical operations at the initial stage of education?

Handbook Section - multiplying a number by zero

“The product 6x0 means that the number 6 never “adds up”, so the result of such a product will be 0.” 6×0=0. "The product of 0x6 means 0+0+0+0+0+0." The value of this “sum” is equal to zero, therefore 0 × 6 \u003d 0 ”The product is presented as“ adding up ”, and there is no such action in mathematics. 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 - the obvious amount is presented as a "product" that "adds up". Further 0 - number and its value and functions are not defined; someone removed 0 to 10th place, so the statements and examples are unproven!

As an example, they give the supposedly “PYTHAGORUS MULTIPLICATION TABLE”, in fact, there is a SUMMATION TABLE OF THE SAME NUMBERS and it doesn’t even smell of any multiplication. When checking this, everyone who is able to check it with a mathematical operation will be convinced of this - SUMMATION. In addition, it is known that "Pythagorean pants are equal in all directions", i.e. the sum of the squares of the legs is equal to the square of the hypotenuse. Pythagoras considered multiplication and exponentiation A 2 + B 2 \u003d C 2 or A × A + B × B \u003d C × C - someone replaced knowledge with a lie.

Section - "displacement" !! multiplication property?

"6×7=42 and 7×6=42 - 6+6+6+6+6+6+6=7+7+7+7+7+7"

6+6+6+6+6+6+6=42 is the sum of seven sixes, i.e. SUMMATION of identical numbers, but where is the multiplication, how is the action ?.

7+7+7+7+7+7=42 is the sum of six sevens, i.e. SUMMATION of identical numbers, but where is the multiplication, as an action?

Actually 6x7 means 6x6x6x6x6x6x6=6 7 ; 7×7×7×7×7×7×7=7 6 , 6 7 >7 6 read the definition of the product, The product is the result of multiplying n factors A×A×A…×A = P and the degree “Power, the product of several equal factors (for example 2 4 = 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 = 16) representation in the form of a notation, the degree is called the exponent.

Some properties of the SUM should be remembered: 1. the number of units (terms) on the left side of the equality is always equal to the number of units on the right side of the equality.

The article Generic Volumetric Knowledge of Russians presents examples of the MULTIPLICATION (EXCITATION) and SUMMATION tables, as well as the counting rules, where the counting starts from zero, and the tables show summation and multiplication with the beginning of actions from one. The ancient account of the RUS: the choice and reduction of one in binary counting - zero-0, ruble-1, semi-1/2, quarter-1/4, eight-1/8, pudovichok-1/16, copper-1/32, silver-1/64, golden-1/128; etc. - selection and increase of the unit: zero-0, ruble-1, pair-2, two pairs-4, four pairs-8, eight pairs-16, sixteen pairs-32, thirty-two pairs-64, sixty-four pairs-128, one hundred and twenty-eight pairs-256, two hundred and fifty-six pairs-512, five hundred and twelve pairs-1024.

Memory in a computer-bit, 2,4,8,16,32,64,128,256,512,1024 kilo bytes

TAB. MULTIPLICATIONS RUS TAB. SUMMATION RUS

P = Multiplier × Multiplier, Σ = Term + Term DEGREE = MAIN. DEGREE×INDICATOR

1х0=1 0=1	1+0=1
1x1=1 1=1	1+1=2
1x2=1 2=1x1=1	1+2=1+1+1=3
1x3=1 3=1x1x1=1	1+3=1+1+1+1=4
1x4=1 4=1x1x1x1=1	1+4=1+1+1+1+1=5
1x5=15=1x1x1x1x1=1	1+5=1+1+1+1+1+1=6
1x6=1 6=1x1x1x1x1x1=1	1+6=1+1+1+1+1+1+1=7
1x7=1 7=1x1x1x1x1x1x1=1	1+7=1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=8
1x8=1 8=1x1x1x1x1x1x1x1=1	1+8=1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=9
1x9=1 9=1x1x1x1x1x1x1x1x1=1	1+9=1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=10
1x10=1 10=1x1x1x1x1x1x1x1x1x1=1	1+10=1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=11
2x0=2 0=1 (2x3=2 3=8 is not equal to 3x2=3 2=9)	2+0=2 (2+3=3+2=5)
2x1=2 1=2	2+1=3
2x2=2 2=2x2=4	2+2=4
2x3=2 3=2x2x2=8	2+2+2=6
2x4=2 4=2x2x2x2=16	2+2+2+2=8
2x5=2 5=2x2x2x2x2=32	2+2+2+2+2=10
2x6=2 6=2x2x2x2x2x2=64	2+2+2+2+2+2=12
2x7=2 7=2x2x2x2x2x2x2=128	2+2+2+2+2+2+2=14
2x8=2 8=2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2=256	2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2=16
2x9=2 9=2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2=512	2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2=18
2x10=2 10=2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2=1024	2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2=20

From the tables it is OBVIOUS to the naked eye that the results of multiplication and

MULTIPLY introduces an obvious contradiction. Multiplication, arithmetic operation. Denoted by a dot or the sign "×" (in literal terms), U. signs are omitted. U. positive integers

(natural numbers) is an action that allows two numbers

a (multiplier) and b (multiplier) find the third number ab (product) equal to sumb terms? Miracles! each of which is equal to a.

A problematic issue in mathematics is “the number (number) 0 (zero), which, by definition, is translated from the Latin nullus-none, the number 0 from the addition (or subtraction) of which to any number does not change: A+0=0+A=A ; the product of any number by zero = zero, A×0=0×A. Dividing by zero is impossible.... Based on the materials of the article Generic volumetric knowledge of RUSs, the value of the number 0 (zero) was and is given paramount importance, which determines the unit (1), the beginning of the counting of objects and the transition to a new unit When considering the MULTIPLICATION table 1×0=1 0 =1 and 2×0 \u003d 2 0 \u003d 1, for example five eggs multiplied by zero \u003d one heel of eggs, we get a new unit (1), in numbers: it will be - (5 i) × 0 \u003d (5 i) 0 \u003d new unit (1) one heel of eggs .

5× (1+1+1+1+1)×5×5×5=(5+5+5+5+5)×5×5×5=(25)×5×5×5=

25× (1+1+1+1+1)×5×5=(25+25+25+25+25)×5×5=

(125) × 5 × 5=

125× (1+1+1+1+1)=(125+125+125+125+125)=625×5.=625(1+1+1+1+1)=

To remove contradictions in the definition of the action of multiplication, it is necessary to provide a logical and natural justification for the mathematical definition of the action of multiplication according to the rules of RUS. Example: 1. sum three seeds 1s + 1s + 1s = 3s “take and add (storage, capitalize)” in a box where they will be stored for 1 year, the result is both before the addition of three seeds - 3s, and after a year 3s. 2. We sum up three seeds 1s + 1s + 1s, after which we plant them in the ground and water them, the sun will warm them up and nature will begin to produce: roots first, then leaves, flowers and, at the last stage, seeds.

After the logical and mathematical proofs of the actions of the product and summation are given in full, the problem of recording mathematical actions that exclude contradictions from the very beginning remains, and this issue is being resolved. First, let's recall the symbols of the sum "Σ" and the product "P", and then we use the algebraic alphanumeric combination in full: 2Σ3=2+2+2=6; in words - sum up two three times equals six! 2P3=2×2×2=8; in words - two to produce (multiply) three times equals eight. Thus, all contradictions and problems in the foundation of primary education, in mathematics, are removed.

An illustrative example, as a consequence of mathematical and other redefinitions and substitution of meaning, is obvious on the Periodic system (PS) of D.I. Mendeleev. In 1905-1906 DI. Mendeleev introduced the ZERO PERIOD and the ZERO SERIES into his PS and put the chemical element under the symbol “X” in the zero row of the zero period and the chemical element “Y” in the zero row of the first period. After the death of D.I. they were withdrawn from the PS by someone, the zero period was excluded by someone, and the zero row was rearranged by someone into the eighth, without the “Y” element. In the Rusov PS, the Vserod electroatom (electrochemical element, "X" according to Mendeleev) is in the zero row of the zero period, and the total electroatom inert HYDROGEN H RUS 2 (electrochemical element, "Y" according to Mendeleev) is in the zero row of the first period. When distributing (arranging) electroatoms according to the volumetric electric density, the PS of RSSs is described in the binary count of RSSs, i.e. PS self-organized calculated! From the school bench We were taught that it is impossible to build a model of an atom without gaps from three balls, and therefore it was necessary to come up with a necessary, some kind of medium that fills the voids between atoms, which was called ETHER. It turned out that with sufficient volumetric vision or the ability to design objects in volume, it is possible to build - Fig3. It turned out that the task - to build a model of the atom without gaps, was solved long ago by the ancestors of the RUSs and was "lost" by someone, and any attempts to restore the ancient design of electroatoms and PS meet stone walls from all interested parties from science, education, magazine editors, and most scientists who have been brought up and trained in Western terms and theories, who have propagated, propagate and will propagate Western scientists and their untenable theories through power structures in abundance.

PERIODIC SYSTEM according to which we are taught,

as if PS D.I. MENDELEEV

Fig 1

When considering Figure 2 PS D.I. Mendeleev reveals that the chemical element Hydrogen "H" is only third in order, and this strikes at the Nobel laureates with their theories and "discoveries". In 1912 E. Rutherford first used the term "nucleus" and, that is why we were taught to call it the Rutherford-Bohr planetary model. However, for the first time in 1901, the French scientist Jean Perrin, and not Rutherford, in the article "Molecular Hypotheses" expressed his hypothesis "a positively charged nucleus is surrounded by negative electrons that move in certain orbits" - this is how the structure of the atom is presented in any modern textbook ". However, these models of atoms and PS did not succumb to physical and mathematical calculation and the models were archived, except for the alleged Rutherford model, and the name of Rutherford, as if the developer, remained. But the most interesting thing is that the conventions "+" and "-" were introduced by B. Franklin in 1798-1800. in the study of friction processes, having sent solid state physics and electricity to a dead end, and in 1897 J. Thomson and, no matter how dependent on him, Emil Wiechert never discovered a negative charge - an electron, since there is nothing negative in nature, and when In the study of X-rays, J. Thomson simply suggested, and together they, as if at the same time, "clearly established that the mass of a negatively charged electron is 1/1837 of the mass of a hydrogen atom."

PERIODIC SYSTEM D.I. Mendeleev1905-1906

Fig.2

In the television program "Academy" in his lectures Nobel laureate Zhores Alferov reminded the students that Roentgen rejected the concept and presence of an electron in nature, and forbade pronouncing this term in his laboratory. Allegedly, the Rutherford-Bohr planetary model of atoms (chemical elements), which is the basis of the theory of modern electricity and the structure of the world, is so far from nature, so abstract, full of contradictions, postulates, conventions, prohibitions, axioms, that it is impossible to create a real "Unified Field Theory", despite the fact that the electromagnetic field really exists.

« The first postulate: an atomic system can only be in special stationary, or quantum states, each of which corresponds to a certain energy E n . In a stationary state, the atom does not radiate." This postulate is in clear conflict with classical mechanics, according to which the energy of moving electrons can be any. It also contradicts Maxwell's electrodynamics, since it allows the possibility of accelerated motion without radiation electromagnetic waves». The second postulate: when an atom passes from one stationary state to another, a quantum of electromagnetic energy is emitted or absorbed. The second postulate also contradicts Maxwell's electrodynamics. With the help of the contradictory postulates of BORA, which act on heads, and not on atoms, it is impossible to develop a physical and mathematical apparatus for a real Periodic System (PS), to define “Electricity”, “Charge”, “Energy”, etc.

When checking the correctness of the distribution of chemical elements in the second period of the Periodic system by atomic weight in Ne, Li, Be, B, C, N, O, F, it turns out that the atomic weight of metals Li, Be under normal conditions is less than that of gases N , O, F, which is contrary to experiments and common sense.

From an isoteric point of view, the PS of the RUS shows that, as it were, the lost knowledge of antiquity is the Volumetric knowledge of the RUS.

A non-nuclear model in the form of a nesting doll of RUS from eights "THREE All-kind All in ONE".

The main module SHAR-POWER is a single electroatom VSEROD Vs.- "X".

Binary module RUS 2 - total electroatom inert HYDROGEN H - "Y"

PERIODIC TABLE OF ELECTROATOMS RUS

Fig 3

Periodic system of RUS

sectional version.

Four generations six generations

Five generations seven generations

Rice. four

A little bit about fundamental contradictions in physics.

In the section of physics "electricity", triboelectricity is not considered at all, the phenomenon of a direct transition of a substance into a direct electric current is recognized by few. Moreover, the primary source of electric charges, the Van der Graaff tribogenerator is excluded from the curriculum of school and university education, which causes serious damage to the problems of understanding the electrical substance, electricity and the processes occurring in the electrical substance and on the surfaces between electrical substances during various interactions.

According to the Fermi theory, materials are divided into conductors, semiconductors and dielectrics according to their electrical conductivity, i.e. by the presence of supposedly forbidden bands for a supposedly electron. However, experiments and logic do not support this introduction to the theory of matter. The main contradiction in Fermi's theory is the impossibility of having band gaps in natural dielectrics: in gases, mixtures of gases, in vacuum. When considering the structures of solid dielectrics SiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , CF 4 and CH 4 gas, etc. it can be seen that the compound is saturated with gases, and when considering structural formulas of these compounds, it can be seen that the atoms of conductors and semiconductors are surrounded on all sides by a gas, which provides the dielectric properties of the compounds, and not the band gaps invented by Fermi.

In electronic engineering, the main materials for semiconductor devices are Si, Ge semiconductors, which, according to the theory, supposedly have "hole" conductivity, however, in logical and practical considerations, this postulate does not stand up to criticism. A "hole" in any material on earth can only be represented as a void in solid body, which is filled with air (gas) or, which is unlikely, vacuum. In any of these options, the "hole" is filled with a dielectric and "conduct" electricity can not. In addition, a "hole" emptiness in a solid cannot "run"; it can only be filled with electrical density and cease to exist. According to the PS RUS, where the physical, chemical (electrostructural) and mathematical expressions of the model of electroatoms do not contradict each other, but are presented in a single expression, conductivity is possible only in a bridge structure for all metals.

LITERATURE

1. Yakusheva G. Mathematics. Student's handbook. Press. M. 1995. - 574p. 2.Soviet encyclopedic Dictionary Prokhorov A.M. Gilyarov M.S. Zhukov E.M. and etc.; under general ed. A.M. Prokhorov. Soviet Encyclopedia M. 1980. 1599s.

3. Vakhrusheva T.V. Glushkova O.B. Cherepenko V.A. .Popova E.V. Schoolchildren's Handbook - AST-PRESS BOOK. M. 2006. - 608s.

4. Rybnikov Yu.S. Generic volumetric knowledge of RUS. Family estate. M. 2007. p. - 64-66.

5. Mendeleev D. I. Attempt of chemical understanding of the world ether. Fundamentals of Chemistry. L. 1934 p. 465-500.

6. Trifonov D.N. Birth of the atomic model. M. Chemistry in Russia. - 2004. No. 4 B. RHO. pp.18-21.

7. Feshchenko T Vozhegova V. Physics. Press. M. 1995. 574s.

8. Rybnikov Yu.S. Russian Orthodox elementary system of the unity of the periodicity of the electroatoms of the Universe. Materials MMK Analysis of systems on the threshold of the XXI century: Theory and Practice. v.3 Intellect. M. - 1997. p. 391 application (tab).

9. Rybnikov Yu.S. Fundamentals of the theory of unity and continuity of the electromagnetic field of the Universe. Materials MMK Analysis of systems on the threshold of the XXI century: Theory and Practice. v.3 Intellect. M. 1997. -391s.