Semiboyarshchina in troubled times briefly. Semiboyarshchina: salvation of the state or treason? The mood in the Boyar Duma, Moscow society and in the provinces

The Seven Boyars is...
"Seven boyars" - "seventh boyars", Russian government, formed after the overthrow of Tsar Vasily Shuisky in July 1610 and formally existed until the election of Tsar Mikhail Romanov to the throne. Boyar rule did not give the country either peace or stability. Moreover, it transferred power to the Polish interventionists and let them into Moscow. Eliminated by the militia of Minin and Pozharsky.
Interregnum
After Vasily Shuisky was overthrown and tonsured a monk, an interregnum began in Russia. False Dmitry 2 was not recognized in the capital, but people were afraid to choose a new king from among themselves. No one wanted to listen to Patriarch Hermogenes, who said that it was necessary to immediately elect either Prince Vasily Golitsyn or Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov as king (this is the first mention of Philaret's son about being elected king!). However, in Moscow it was decided to rule jointly - by a council of seven boyars. At the Arbat Gate, a meeting of all the "ranks" of the state was held - representatives of the nobility and nobility. They, after approving the overthrow of Shuisky, asked the members of the Boyar Duma, “to welcome, accept Moscow State until God gives us a sovereign for the Muscovite kingdom.
The composition of the Seven Boyars included
- Prince Fyodor Ivanovich Mstislavsky
- Prince Ivan Mikhailovich Vorotynsky
- Prince Andrei Vasilievich Troubetzkoy
- Prince Andrei Vasilyevich Golitsyn
- Prince Boris Mikhailovich Lykov-Obolensky
Boyar Ivan Nikitich Romanov
Boyarin Fedor Ivanovich Sheremetev
Prince Mstislavsky became the head of the Seven Boyars.

Treaty with the Poles
But everything was clear that such a form of government in Russia was short-lived, and Tushin's idea of ​​​​inviting Prince Vladislav began to win more and more adherents. The Seven Boyars, meeting public opinion, concluded on August 17, 1610 with the commander of the Polish king Sigismund II, hetman Zolkiewski, an agreement on calling the son of the king, 15-year-old prince Vladislav, to the Russian throne. The boyars wanted Vladislav to convert to Orthodoxy, marry a Russian, and lift the siege of Smolensk.
Zholkiewski did not promise all this, but he undertook to send a representative Russian embassy to the king for negotiations. For seven weeks, Muscovites swore allegiance to Tsar Vladislav in the Kremlin. The oath became a genuine expression of the will of the people: 8-12 thousand Muscovites entered the Assumption Cathedral a day, took an oath of allegiance to Tsar Vladislav, kissed the cross and the Gospel. And so 300 thousand people passed through the Kremlin! Meanwhile, the Kremlin itself and other important Moscow centers began to be occupied by regular Polish troops. Soon, Moscow was essentially occupied by the Polish army. This happened on September 20-21, 1610.
Hetman Zholkiewski began to demand that the former Tsar Shuisky and his brothers be handed over to him, which the Seven Boyars did without regret. Even the monk Shuisky, with his influence, money and connections, did not cease to be dangerous for the boyars who seized power. 1610, September - crowds of Muscovites poured into the streets of the capital to see the last exit of Tsar Vasily. Few people then felt a sense of national humiliation, seeing how in a wretched chariot, following the Polish horsemen in sparkling armor, they carried the captive Russian tsar, dressed in a worn monastic cassock. On the contrary, the people even thanked the Hetman Zholkiewski, who was prancing among the Russian boyars, for "delivering" them from the malicious Shuisky.

A huge (more than 1 thousand people) embassy went to the king's camp near Smolensk, expecting to soon return to the capital with the new sovereign. But nothing good came of this idea. Negotiations in Sigismund's camp stalled. As it turned out, the king considers the state of things in a completely different way than Zholkievsky, that Sigismund is against the fact that his son would convert to Orthodoxy and does not want to let him go to Moscow. Moreover, Sigismund himself decided to become the Russian Tsar (Zhigimont Ivanovich), to unite Poland, Lithuania and Russia under his rule.
Why were the boyars in such a hurry to swear an oath to Vladislav, why did they bind hundreds of thousands of people with sacred oaths, obliging them to obey an unknown sovereign? They, as often happens in history, took care of themselves first. IN Time of Troubles interregnum, the boyars most of all feared the capricious mob of Moscow and False Dmitry 2, who, inspired by the defeat of the Russian army near Klushino, made a rush to the capital. At any time, he could break into Moscow and "sit down on the kingdom" - the impostor in the capital would have found many supporters. In a word, the Seven Boyars could not delay. The Polish forces, on the other hand, seemed to the boyars a reliable shield against the robbers of the Tushinsky thief and the unfaithful Moscow mob. After the Poles agreed in principle to the election of Vladislav, all other problems seemed to the boyars not so important and easily resolved at a personal meeting with Sigismund II.
Now the Russian ambassadors found themselves in a terrible situation: they could not agree to the proclamation of Sigismund II as the Russian Tsar, but they could not leave shamefully with nothing. The negotiations went on with raised voices, and after that it turned out that the ambassadors, like former king Vasily, - captives of the Poles ...

Civil uprising. Liberation of Moscow
The new government let the Polish army into Moscow, hoping that False Dmitry would not come here like that. From that time on, the whole essence of the Seven Boyars was reduced to playing the role of puppets in the hands of the King of Poland, who began to pursue a policy pleasing to him through his protege, the commandant of Moscow, Alexander Gonsevsky. The boyars were deprived of real power and became, in fact, hostages. It is in such a pitiful role that it is customary to see the answer to the question: “What is the Seven Boyars?”
After all real power passed from the hands of the boyars to the Polish governor, he, having received the rank of boyar, began to uncontrollably run the state. At his own will, he began to take away lands and estates from those Russians who remained faithful to their patriotic duty, and transferred them to the Poles, who were part of his inner circle. This caused a wave of indignation in the state. It is believed that at that time the Seven Boyars also changed their attitude towards the Poles.
Soon False Dmitry 2 was killed by traitors. The enemy was defeated, but this did not save the boyar government from the problem. The Polish army settled in Moscow firmly settled down and did not intend to leave.
The authorities and the people were against the Catholic king. The people's militia began to gather, but as a result, everything ended in complete failure - the militias were defeated by the Poles. More successful was the Second Militia. Under the leadership of Prince Pozharsky and zemstvo elder Minin. They correctly decided that in addition to the will to defeat the Polish army, the militias needed material support.
The people were ordered to give up a third of their property under pain of complete confiscation. So, the militias received good funding, more and more volunteers joined their ranks. Soon strength militia exceeded 10,000. They approached Moscow and began a siege of the Polish invaders.
The Polish garrison was doomed, but was not going to surrender to the last. After several months of siege, the militias were able to win - Kitay-gorod and the Kremlin were captured by storm, the Poles were captured and killed. Moscow was liberated. 1613, February 21 - the boyars chose a new ruler - Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov. This was the end of the period that entered the history of Russia as the Seven Boyars. The years of the reign of the seven boyars are rightly considered one of the most difficult for the entire period of the Time of Troubles. Upon their completion, the country entered a new historical era.

They created a transitional government, the purpose of which was to prepare the election of a new tsar to replace the deposed Vasily Shuisky. However, the peculiarities of the Time of Troubles, against which the events unfolded, demanded immediate decisions from them.

A country in a state of severe crisis

The political and economic situation in Russia by the beginning of 1610 was very difficult. The war with the Commonwealth proceeded extremely unfavorably for her, in addition, the army of another impostor who claimed to be the heir to the throne, False Dmitry II, came close to Moscow. He went down in history under the nickname Tushinsky thief - at the location of his camp in the village of Tushino near Moscow.

The situation was aggravated by the consequences of the uprising that swept through Russia shortly before, led by Ivan Bolotnikov, as well as the attack of the Nagai and Crimean Tatars. All this led to the extreme impoverishment of the people and the inevitable social tension in such cases. The next defeat of the tsarist troops in the battle with the Poles served as an impetus for popular unrest and the deposition of Tsar Vasily Shuisky.

Education of the Seven Boyars

Ahead was the election of a new autocrat, and in order to prepare this most important act in the life of the state, as well as to govern the country during the transition period, a provisional government was formed, which included seven of the most well-born and influential members of the Boyar Duma. Among them were the princes F. I. Mstislavsky, I. M. Vorotynsky, A. V. Trubetskoy, A. V. Golitsyn, as well as the boyars B. M. Lykov-Obolensky, I. N. Romanov and F. I. Sheremetev .

So, on the wave of Polish intervention and domestic problems, the Seven Boyars was formed. The years of government of this body of power, headed by Prince Fyodor Mikhailovich Mstislavsky, ended with the accession to the throne of the first tsar from the House of Romanov, Mikhail Fedorovich, and the end of the Time of Troubles. But this was preceded by a difficult and long period.

The limited power of the boyars

In order to understand what the Semiboyarshchina is and how wide its powers were, one should take into account the situation that had developed around Moscow by that time. It is known from documentary sources that to the west of it, in the immediate vicinity of the city outposts, there were Poles led by Hetman Zhelkovsky, and in the southeast, in Kolomenskoye, the army of False Dmitry, reinforced by the Lithuanian detachment of Sapieha, was located. Thus, for the entire time of the Seven Boyars, her power did not extend beyond the capital.

Forced collusion with the Poles

The question of what is the Seven Boyars in the history of Russia, as a rule, has never caused discussions. Usually the members of this government body were assigned the role of national traitors, and here's the thing. For them personally, the main threat was not the Poles, with whom it was possible to negotiate if desired, but the impostor detachments, which had many supporters among the Moscow common people. In the event of the victory of the Tushinsky thief, the boyars would definitely not have demolished their heads.

This prompted them to negotiate with Hetman Zhelkovsky and sign an agreement according to which Vladislav Vaza, the son of the Polish king, was to become the Russian tsar. The Lithuanians who supported the impostor, led by Sapieha, also agreed to swear allegiance to the Polish prince, thus losing a real opportunity to seize power in Moscow.

Hostages of their own decisions

However, in order to have greater guarantees of personal safety, the boyars secretly opened the Kremlin gates on the night of September 21, 1610 and let the invaders into the capital. From that moment on, the whole essence of the Seven Boyars was reduced to playing the role of puppets in the hands of the Polish king, who pursued a political line pleasing to him through his protege, Moscow commandant Alexander Gonsevsky. The boyars were deprived of real power and became, in essence, hostages. It is in this miserable role of theirs that it is customary to see the answer to the question: "What is the Seven Boyars?"

Although the treaty infringed on the national interests of the Russian people and was offensive to them, it did not talk about Russia's accession to the Commonwealth, but stipulated the preservation of Orthodoxy throughout its territory. He himself was, according to the agreement, obliged to convert from the Catholic faith to Orthodoxy.

The arbitrariness that caused national indignation

After all real power passed from the hands of the transitional government to the Polish governor, he, having received the rank of boyar, began to run the country uncontrollably. At his own discretion, Vladislav took away lands and estates from those Russians who remained faithful to their patriotic duty, and gave them away to the Poles who made up his inner circle. This caused a wave of indignation in the country. It is believed that during this period, the Seven Boyars changed their attitude towards the Poles.

During the Time of Troubles, the head of the Russian Orthodox Church A true patriot of his Fatherland, he, with the support of the boyars, sent letters throughout Russia in which he called for the creation of a militia and armed struggle against the invaders. Despite the fact that, by order of the Polish governor, he was imprisoned in the dungeon of the Chudov Monastery, where he soon died of starvation, his messages became the impetus that resulted in the appearance of the regiments of Minin and Pozharsky under the walls of Moscow.

End of the period of the Seven Boyars

The election to the throne of the tsar that followed in 1613 was the end of the period that entered the history of Russia as the Seven Boyars. The years of rule of seven representatives of the highest Moscow nobility are rightly considered one of the most difficult for the entire period of the Time of Troubles. Upon their completion, the country entered a new historical era.

Speaking about the origin of the term itself, one should mention the relatively late appearance of the word Seven Boyars. During the Time of Troubles and over the next two centuries, the members of this government structure were called "seven boyars". The expression used now is first encountered only in 1813 in the story of A. A. Bestuzhev-Marlinsky.

IN Russian history and earlier there were periods when, in the absence of the tsar, power was concentrated in the hands of boyar commissions. This happened mainly when the sovereign went to war or a long pilgrimage. It was then that it became a tradition to create these provisional government bodies of seven people. The Russian historian of the 17th century, official G.K. Kotoshikhin writes about this in detail in his writings.

Attempts to rethink the events of the past

It should be noted that in last years the question of what is the Seven Boyars and what is its role in Russian history received a slightly different coverage. If in Soviet period Since the actions of this temporary authority were unequivocally regarded as a betrayal, in the post-perestroika period, publications appeared in which conspiracy with the Poles is seen as the only reasonable diplomatic move aimed at saving the country from the bloody chaos that is inevitable in the event of the victory of False Dmitry II.

Today, being outside of ideological stereotypes, researchers have the opportunity to give a more objective assessment of the historical realities of the past centuries, among which the Seven Boyars occupy an important place. The years separating us from that era did not erase the negative aspects of its activities from the people's memory, but they also allowed them to be given a deeper understanding.

The name accepted by historians of the transitional government of the seven boyars in 1610-1613.

The defeat of the troops of Vasily Shuisky from the Poles near Klushin (June 24 / July 4, 1610) finally undermined the shaky authority of the "boyar tsar", and a coup took place in Moscow upon news of this event. The nobles, led by Lyapunov, and the townspeople overthrew Vasily Shuisky from the throne and forcibly tonsured him a monk. A group of seven boyars led by Mstislavsky - "Seven Boyars" - became in charge of Moscow. One of her first decisions was not to elect representatives of Russian families as tsar. In fact, its power did not extend beyond Moscow: in the west of Moscow, in Khoroshevo, the Poles stood at the head of Zholkevsky, and in the southeast, in Kolomenskoye, False Dmitry II, who returned from Kaluga, with whom was the Polish detachment of Sapieha. The boyars were especially afraid of False Dmitry, because he had many supporters in Moscow and was at least more popular than them. As a result, it was decided to negotiate with the Poles and invite the Polish prince Vladislav to the throne on the terms of his conversion to Orthodoxy, as had already been agreed between Sigismund and the Tushino delegation. On August 17 (27), 1610, an appropriate agreement was signed between the boyars and the hetman Zholkevsky, and Moscow kissed the cross to Vladislav. However, fearing the Pretender, the boyars went further and on the night of September 21 let the Poles into the Kremlin, after which power actually passed to the commander of the Polish garrison Alexander Gonsevsky.

Composition

  1. Prince Fyodor Ivanovich Mstislavsky (d. 1622).
  2. Prince Ivan Mikhailovich Vorotynsky (d. 1627).
  3. Prince Andrei Vasilyevich Trubetskoy (d. 1612).
  4. Prince Andrei Vasilyevich Golitsyn (d. March 19 (31), 1611).
  5. Prince Boris Mikhailovich Lykov-Obolensky (1576 - June 2, 1646).
  6. Boyar Ivan Nikitich Romanov (d. October 23, 1640).
  7. Boyarin Fedor Ivanovich Sheremetev (d. 1650).

The Seven Boyars is the reign of the boyars in troubled times.

Undesirable king

The beginning of the 17th century was a difficult time for Russia and was marked by a series of terrible events. The war began with the Commonwealth, from which Russia suffered defeat.

The Russian lands were engulfed by the uprising of Ivan Bolotnikov, and immediately after the uprising of False Dmitry II. Some areas were attacked by the Nogais - Crimean Tatars.

The authority of Tsar Vasily Shuisky was irrevocably undermined. The people were tired of his constant failures, the country was oppressed and plundered. In 1610, Vasily Shuisky was deposed from the throne and forced to be tonsured a monk. Power was seized by a group of conspirators, consisting of seven boyars.

Later, the new government extradited the former tsar to the Polish military, and he was sent into captivity, where he later died. Composition of the provisional government:

  • prince Mstislavsky,
  • Prince Vorotynsky,
  • Prince Trubetskoy,
  • Prince Golitsyn,
  • Prince Lykov-Obolensky,
  • boyar Romanov
  • boyar Sheremetev.

Later historians called this phenomenon "seven boyars".

The power of the seven boyars

The new provisional government could not independently cope with the threats looming from all sides, both outside and inside the country. A new king had to be chosen. They did not see any candidates for tsars among the Russian representatives. It was decided to invite the son of the Polish king to the Russian throne Sigismund III- Vladislav.

The only condition for Vladislav was that he accept the Orthodox faith. At the same time, the powers of the boyars were preserved. Meanwhile, the uprising of False Dmitry II was rampant and was gaining strength more and more. Quite a large part of the people supported the impostor and was ready to take his side in the struggle for the throne.

The new government decided not to tempt fate, they let Polish troops into Moscow, hoping that False Dmitry would not dare to poke his head here. Soon False Dmitry II was killed by traitors. The enemy was defeated, but this did not save the interim government from problems. The Polish troops settled in Moscow firmly settled down and were not going to leave.

And the Polish king Sigismund had already proposed his candidacy for the throne and forbade Vladislav to accept the Orthodox faith.

Civil uprising. Liberation

The authorities and the people were against the Catholic king. The militia began to gather, but in the end it ended in complete failure - the militia troops were defeated by the Poles. The second militia was more successful. It was headed by Prince Pozharsky and Zemstvo headman Minin. They decided that in addition to the will to defeat the Poles, the militias needed material motivation.

The people were ordered to give up a third of their property under pain of complete confiscation. Thus, the militias had good funding, more and more volunteers joined their ranks. Soon the number of people's militia exceeded 10 thousand. They approached Moscow and began the siege of the Polish invaders.

The Poles were doomed, but did not give up to the last. After several months of siege, the militias won - they stormed Kitai-Gorod and the Kremlin, the Poles were captured and killed. Moscow was liberated. On February 21, 1613, the boyars chose a new ruler - the boyar Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov. The war with the Poles lasted until 1619.

Seven Boyars

1610 - 1612

Semiboyarschina - the name of the transitional government of seven boyars accepted by historians in the summer of 1610.

Forced tonsure of Vasily Shuisky (1610). Engraving by P. Ivanov. XIX century.

The defeat of the troops of Vasily Shuisky from the Poles near Klushin (June 24 / July 4, 1610) finally undermined the shaky authority of the "boyar tsar", but the Poles were in no hurry to capture Moscow. Meanwhile, the “thieves” of False Dmitry II approached the capital.

Moscow uprising

On July 17, the people, dissatisfied with the failures of Shuisky, began to gather under the windows of the royal palace, shouting "You are no longer our king!" Voivode Zakhary Lyapunov gathered his people at the Execution Ground and supported these demands. The conspirators, having gathered in the area of ​​the Serpukhov Gates, declared themselves the Zemsky Sobor and deposed Vasily Shuisky from the throne, and then forcibly tonsured him a monk of the Chudov Monastery.

Seeking Consent

The Boyar Duma tried to curb the popular uprising, which legalized the rebellion and tried to prevent the union of the mob with the “thieves” who had approached the walls of Moscow. The boyars, headed by Mstislavsky, formed a provisional government called the Seven Boyars. One of the tasks of the new government was the preparation of the election of a new king. However, "military conditions" required immediate solutions. In order to avoid the struggle of the boyar clans for power, it was decided not to elect representatives of the Russian clans as tsar.

In fact, the power of the new government did not extend beyond Moscow: in the west of Moscow, in Khoroshev, the Poles stood at the head of Zholkevsky, and in the southeast, in Kolomenskoye, False Dmitry II returned from Kaluga, with whom was the Polish detachment of Sapieha. The boyars were especially afraid of False Dmitry, because he had many supporters in Moscow and was at least more popular than them. As a result, it was decided to negotiate with the Poles and invite the Polish prince Vladislav to the throne on the terms of his conversion to Orthodoxy, as had already been agreed between Sigismund and the Tushino delegation.

Vocation of the Poles

On August 17/27, 1610, the boyars signed an agreement with Hetman Zholkevsky, according to which Vladislav IV, the son of Sigismund, became the king of Russia. There was no question of unification with Poland, since the Moscow boyars retained autonomy, as well as the official status of Orthodoxy within the borders of Russia was guaranteed. The agreement with the Poles made it possible to remove the "Tushino threat" for Moscow, since Sapieha agreed to swear allegiance to King Vladislav.
Fearing the Pretender, the boyars went further and on the night of September 21 let Zholkevsky's Poles into the Kremlin, after whose departure in October power passed to the commander of the Polish garrison Alexander Gonsevsky. Boyar Mikhail Saltykov became the "right hand" of the Polish commandant. After the appearance of the Polish interventionists in the Kremlin, the representatives of the “Seven Boyars” turned from collaborators into hostages, and after the capitulation of the Polish garrison, many of them were “liberated” and took part in the election of a new Russian tsar.

The name "Seven Boyars"

When describing boyar commissions by modern sources of the Time of Troubles, there are turns about “seven boyars”. The word formation "Seven Boyars" occurs later, in the 19th century. The dissertation on the Seven Boyars refers to the story of A.A. Bestuzhev-Marlinsky "Attacks, a story of 1613" (1831), where the term "seven boyars" occurs for the first time.

Number of elected boyars

Boyar commissions were formed earlier in the absence of the tsar. As a rule, the composition of these groups was limited to 7 persons or slightly differed quantitatively. Kotoshikhin writes about this:
“And when you go on a campaign to the war, or pray in a monastery, or for a walk in far and near places, your royal court and Moscow for protection, he orders one man to a boyar, and with him to his comrades, two people who are roundabout, and two people to a duma nobleman , and a duma clerk.

The state of Russia at the time of the election of the transitional government

The circumstances are such that Russia was simultaneously:
1) in a state of war with the Commonwealth (since 1604),
2) covered by the uprising of False Dmitry II (since 1607).

In addition, Russia almost simultaneously suffered:
3) an uprising led by Ivan Bolotnikov (in 1606-1607),
4) Nogai attack (in 1607-1608),
5) the attack of the Krymchaks (in 1608).

Reasons for the formation of a transitional government

A successive chain of events led to the emergence of the period of the "Seven Boyars" February 1610 - part of the Tushino opposition near Smolensk began negotiations with Polish king Sigismund about the invitation to Russian kingdom Prince Vladislav with the restriction of his rights in favor of the Boyar Duma and the Zemsky Sobor. May 1610 - The twenty-three-year-old influential Russian military leader Skopin-Shuisky dies after a feast in Moscow, which leads to an increase in anti-Shui sentiment. June 1610 - part of the troops of the Russian tsar is defeated by the Poles near the village of Klushino, and the governor of the other part of the army, Valuev, agrees to support the candidacy of Prince Vladislav.
Thus, the road to Moscow was open to the Poles. On the other hand, False Dmitry II quickly moved from Kaluga to Moscow.

The mood in Boyar Duma, Moscow society and in the province

A small group led by Patriarch Hermogenes supported Tsar Vasily Shuisky. The patriarch himself tried to protect Shuisky even on the day of the overthrow of the latter.
The Golitsyn party hoped to overthrow Shuisky and proclaim Vasily Golitsyn tsar. At the same time, the Golitsyns were supported by the governor Lyapunov.
Tushino boyar Dmitry Trubetskoy secretly negotiated in Moscow in the interests of False Dmitry.
The Romanov clan, initially oriented towards the Golitsyns, hoped to place Mikhail Romanov on the throne.
Prince Mstislavsky, who headed the Duma, did not have a clear position, but tended to recognize the Polish prince as the Russian tsar.
From Ser. July 1610, several thousand troops of the impostor settled in Kolomenskoye. Almost simultaneously, on July 17, Shuisky was overthrown, on July 19 he was forcibly tonsured a monk, and on July 20, letters were sent to provincial cities announcing this event. On July 24, the crown hetman Zholkievsky was 7 versts from Moscow from the Khoroshevsky meadows. In this regard, it was already necessary to choose between False Dmitry II and Prince Vladislav.
The historian Solovyov assesses the current situation as follows:
“If the impostor could have adherents in the lower strata of the Moscow population, then the boyars and all the best people they could not in any way agree to accept a thief who would bring to the Duma his Tushino and Kaluga boyars, roundabouts and duma nobles, who would give the estate of rich people to be plundered by his Cossacks and city spies, his old allies. Therefore, for the boyars and the best people, for protective people who had something to protect, the only salvation from the thief and his Cossacks was Vladislav, that is, Hetman Zolkiewski with his army. Zakhar Lyapunov, seduced by the thief's enormous promises, was the head of the False Dimitrieva party; The head of Vladislav’s side was the first boyar, Prince Mstislavsky, who announced that he himself did not want to be king, but he also did not want to see one of his boyar brothers as king, and that he should elect a sovereign from the royal family.

Convocation of the Zemsky Sobor

The Boyar Duma could not choose a tsar without the participation of the Zemsky Sobor, but the situation required a quick decision. Therefore, immediately after the overthrow of the tsar, those representatives of the zemstvos who were available were convened outside the Serpukhov Gates of Moscow. Events are described in different ways. From Kostomarov:
“Zakhar Lyapunov with Saltykov and Khomutov ascended the high Lobnoye Mesto and began to invite the boyars, the patriarch, the spiritual, the nobles, the children of the boyars and the entire Orthodox people to a national meeting outside the Serpukhov Gates. People poured out of Serpukhov Gates from everywhere. The boyars gathered there. The patriarch has also arrived"

In the Moscow Chronicle, the actions are tougher:
“All of Moscow and entered the city (that is, the Kremlin) and took the boyars and Patriarch Hermogenes by force and led them across the Moscow River to the Serpukhov Gates.”
In this case, researchers are faced with a case of law. During the absence of the head of state, political will and enforcement of the law are necessary, but forceful pressure on one (or several) representatives of power can be regarded as an illegal act, and therefore the decision of the Zemsky Sobor in this case can not be recognized as undeniably legitimate. No less important is the question, was the meeting of people convened through the tocsin really a cathedral? According to researcher V.N. Latkin, who used the materials of the Stolyarovsky chronograph, which lists the ranks present at the Council of 1610, the minimum composition of the Zemsky Sobor was assembled.
“And the Boyars, Prince Fyodor Ivanovich Mstislavsky, and all the Boyars, and Okolnichie, and Duma people, and Stolniki, and Solicitors, and Nobles, and guests, and the best trading people gathered outside the city ...”
S.F. Platonov explains the presence of zemstvo officials from the provinces in Moscow by the fact that they were in the capital on duty.

Composition

1. Prince Fyodor Ivanovich Mstislavsky - the year of birth is not known, but he began his service in 1575. By the moment described, he headed the Boyar Duma. During the interregnum, his influence increased, he led the negotiations with the Poles. Politics was not active, focused on a specific moment. He died without issue in 1622.
2. Prince Ivan Mikhailovich Vorotynsky - the year of birth is not known, but in 1573 he was already a governor in Murom. By the moment described, he had survived exile, failures and victories in the war, was a politician with experience. Subsequently, he claimed the throne, but lost in the political struggle to the Romanovs, went as an ambassador to the future tsar to call for the kingdom. Died in 1627.
3. Prince Andrei Vasilyevich Trubetskoy - year of birth is not known, but on military service from 1573. military and administrative activities. By the moment described, he participated in the war with Stefan Batory, Krymchaks, Livonians, Swedes, Cherkasy, voivodship in several cities, participated in diplomatic missions. Granted by the boyars in honor of the wedding of Boris Godunov on September 3, 1598. He did not shy away from localism. He died without issue in 1611.
4. Prince Andrei Vasilyevich Golitsyn (d. March 19 (31), 1611). Copyright © 2015 Unconditional Love

mob_info