The moon is empty inside. Is the moon an artificially created object? Proven?!? hollow moon theory

According to the hollow moon theory, the most interesting part of our satellite may be inside, and this mystery is even more curious than the far side of the planet. All our lives we have seen this luminous ball in the night sky, but is there any evidence that our Moon can be empty?

For centuries there have been some bizarre and maybe absurd theories about life on the moon. Given the current level of science and technology, many hypotheses are a thing of the past, but some of the great ideas continue to bother us.

It is believed that the Moon was formed as a result of an ancient collision of the Earth with another planet, when our solar system was just being formed. It is a large satellite, at least compared to Earth.

Eleven people went to the surface of the moon as part of the American program, and since then no one else has set foot on the satellite. Scientists think they have a good idea of what the moon is, but what if they're wrong?

There are those who believe that the Moon is a hollow sphere, and what happens inside it is much more interesting than what happens on the surface. Others say the Moon is artificial and could even be some kind of starship parked in Earth orbit by an alien race thousands of years ago.

Could our best explorers and astronomers have been wrong about the Moon all these years, and the people who landed there haven't mastered the whole truth about this planet? Or, even worse, is there a dark conspiracy here, and maybe the governments of the world?

To shed light of truth on the hollow moon version, we only need to look at the earth. Indeed, the geological consensus is that the Earth and the Moon are of the same construction, and each of the objects has a solid inner core surrounded by a liquid outer core and then a mantle. The moon even has a history of volcanic activity, but these obvious facts do not shake the enthusiasm of supporters of an interesting theory.

Nature built amazing images? Could the Moon be a habitable object?

The hollow earth theory says that our planet has an empty core, and there are holes at each pole. If we believe this, then we can enter one of the openings and penetrate into the underworld of the Earth. " inner sun» keeps the place warm and modern civilization humanoids thrive right under our feet.

So where is the proof? Well, Admiral Richard E. Byrd, the famous explorer, supposedly traveled on North Pole, having discovered the inner Earth back in 1947.

There, he met a race of sentient beings living in glittering cities who told him to return to the surface and warn the human race to "be humble" or they might ruin everything. The admiral allegedly recorded all this in his famous diary.

Of course, according to official data, the admiral at that time was on the other side of the planet. However, Hollow Earth supporters know that this is just part of a conspiracy to hide the truth from the public.

If our governments do not allow the "truth" about the Earth's underworld to be spread, they are certainly not going to tell the truth about the Moon. However, where did the Hollow Moon theory come from?

HOLLOW MOON THEORY

Without a doubt, the idea of a hollow moon has existed for centuries, and has been a key element in a number of works of art. But one of the strongest pieces of evidence that is often cited is the experiments performed by the Apollo missions in the late 60s.

After placing seismic sensors on the Moon, the completed lift stage lunar module was directed at the surface of the satellite. The planned crash caused stunning reverberations, such as the ringing of a bell.

Each time the experiment was repeated in subsequent missions, using a spent rocket part, the Moon “ringed” for several hours.

This is a completely different reaction than the Earth shows to such an impact. For many, this means that the moon must have a hollow interior. That's right, what else will cause reverb? Of course, scientists do not fully agree with this. In fact, the "bell" story is sometimes said to be an incorrect analogy rather than a more literal description of the Moon's reaction to the impact. However, this is an interesting piece of the puzzle.

NASA recognizes the bizarre nature of earthquakes and that small earthquakes tend to last much longer than similar earthquakes on Earth. The gist of the explanation is that there is still much to be learned about the Moon.

WHAT'S INSIDE THE MOON?

So, what can be inside the moon if the planet is really hollow? Of course, a hollow moon could well be represented by a geological feature that means next to nothing. But it's so boring! It is much more interesting to talk about what can happen on the Moon, especially mixing the phenomenon of aliens into history.

We know that at modern technologies it would take about a thousand years to reach the nearest star system. If we raise progress a little more, then in the next century or so we can reduce it to a few hundred years. But even traveling at the speed of light, it would be a four-year trip to the nearest star system.

We always assume that alien civilizations capable of visiting Earth have found a way to overcome the distance barrier, either using theoretical "wormholes" or certain technological advances that we can hardly imagine.

But what if they didn't? What if it takes hundreds or even thousands of years for aliens to get here, no matter where they come from?

If they visit Earth, they may have come here on ships of several generations. Probably, these will be large starships the size of cities or even continents, where aliens will live their lives. Perhaps the aliens visiting us today are the descendants of those who left their home world long ago.

Perhaps, using such a ship, an alien civilization has established colonies in various star systems in order to observe primitive life as it develops (like us). In such a case, there is no better place for an observer (not necessarily secret) than an orbital base, such as the Moon near the Earth.

So, the hollow moon seems like the perfect place for an alien base. It is close to the star for energy and close to the object of observation.

For most of our history, we couldn't get to the moon, and even now we don't give her much trouble. In addition, one side of the Moon is always turned away from the Earth. Who knows what might be going on there, hiding from our prying eyes?

It's an interesting idea, but some people take it a step further and wonder if aliens brought the moon themselves?

THE MOON IS ALIEN SHIP

The theory of the moon as a spaceship is a terrific idea put forward by a couple of Soviet scientists back in the 1970s. It states that the moon is actually the creation of an alien race. A space civilization is far more advanced than we have long since parked in Earth's orbit.

The most interesting part of this theory may be where it came from, but that can only be guessed at. But it makes sense when a version of a hollow moon with a residential interior is being discussed. This idea is supported by stories of "pre-lunar" people remembering the legends of how the moon appeared after the Flood and the nights began to light up.

Scientifically, the idea is supported by how impact craters form on the Moon. Even the largest impact craters are quite shallow, suggesting that there may be some kind of solid and impenetrable body beneath the surface of the moon rock.

It is also interesting to note that some lunar rocks have been found much older than rocks on Earth, although both objects were formed during the same period. Some scientists might say that this is because the Earth is still geologically active.

On Earth, new rocks are still being formed today, and old ones are returning to the mantle through subduction. On the Moon, geological phenomena have long ceased. However, supporters of the hollow moon are not at a loss and call this another proof that the moon was built elsewhere and brought here by an alien race.

THE MOON AND CONSPIRACY THEORIES

When it comes to the Moon, we have to ask ourselves one question: why hasn't anyone been there in the last nearly 50 years? We continue to study the moon and send probes into orbit, but no one has set foot on the moon since 1972. Why? Were we warned to stay away from the moon as soon as we started messing around there?

When many of us were children, we listened with admiration to the great projects: there will be colonies on the Moon, or at least there will be scientific outposts and space stations!

Of course, there are problems to build / maintain a prepared station on the Moon. But it looks like the next logical step in space exploration. So why is the Moon being ignored and why are all the space agencies targeting Mars? Is it really that boring to go to the moon, or is there something that keeps people away?

If there really is an alien civilization on the Moon, we can only imagine their annoyance when NASA astronauts started running around the surface, and even wanted to detonate a nuclear weapon there (). Perhaps the people were given a warning or, more accurately, the leading governments of the world were given a warning.

To avoid hysteria, they withheld the truth from the entire population, but the message was clear: you have seen everything it takes to see the moon. That's enough, now move on.

Is the Moon really the base for UFOs and flying saucers that have been observed for hundreds and thousands of years? Is it an empty sphere inhabited by creatures from another star system? Is it a multi-generational spaceship that traveled countless light years to arrive on Earth's doorstep thousands of years ago?

Probably no. Scientists today seem pretty smart people, and according to them, there is no evidence for a hollow moon.

But the idea is intriguing, and there is always the possibility of a misleading conclusion by scientists. Like thousands of thousands of years, the Moon remains a mysterious luminous ball in the night sky. Undoubtedly, there are many mysteries that must be revealed if people decide to go to the satellite again.

During its movement through the signs of the Zodiac, the Moon enters into interactions (aspects) with other planets. These aspects are positive (for example, a favorable aspect with Venus) and tense (for example, an unfavorable aspect with Mars). During periods when the Moon has already made its last exact aspect, but has not yet moved into the next sign of the Zodiac, it has a negative impact on many life situations. This is the so-called Moon without a course or a single Moon. A period of the Moon without a course usually occurs every two and a half days and can last from a few seconds to two days.

The moon without a course is an important factor that strongly influences our endeavors. The idle moon time is considered unfavorable for starting any activity and making responsible decisions. During these periods, it is necessary to avoid launching new projects and any other cases that are designed for the future and development, and which are aimed at concrete results.

The list of such cases is quite diverse - this is sending important letters, filing applications, signing contracts, employment new job, buying a car or apartment, having a surgery, and getting married. The idle moon periods are especially important for business. With the Moon without a course, it is not recommended to register an enterprise, invest money, conclude new contracts, lend. As a rule, things that start with the Moon without a course are not put into practice or are not carried out in the right direction.

The Moon Out of Course calendar can help you avoid setbacks if you are planning an important business.

MOON WITHOUT A COURSE IN 2019
MOON WITHOUT COURSE IN JANUARY 2019	MOON WITHOUT COURSE IN JULY 2019
02.01.2019 01:26 — 02.01.2019 11:58 04.01.2019 20:41 — 04.01.2019 21:55 07.01.2019 09:20 — 07.01.2019 09:46 09.01.2019 19:53 — 09.01.2019 22:44 11.01.2019 17:25 — 12.01.2019 11:18 14.01.2019 18:56 — 14.01.2019 21:31 16.01.2019 21:34 — 17.01.2019 04:00 19.01.2019 04:32 — 19.01.2019 06:44 21.01.2019 04:50 — 21.01.2019 06:54 23.01.2019 04:19 — 23.01.2019 06:22 24.01.2019 16:50 — 25.01.2019 07:02 27.01.2019 08:21 — 27.01.2019 10:31 29.01.2019 01:39 — 29.01.2019 17:33	02.07.2019 00:48 — 02.07.2019 04:24 03.07.2019 17:25 — 04.07.2019 06:19 05.07.2019 09:24 — 06.07.2019 07:25 07.07.2019 19:50 — 08.07.2019 09:07 09.07.2019 22:35 — 10.07.2019 12:29 12.07.2019 03:28 — 12.07.2019 18:05 14.07.2019 04:30 — 15.07.2019 02:05 17.07.2019 00:38 — 17.07.2019 12:19 18.07.2019 18:53 — 20.07.2019 00:19 22.07.2019 11:34 — 22.07.2019 13:02 24.07.2019 17:48 — 25.07.2019 00:42 27.07.2019 07:28 — 27.07.2019 09:29 28.07.2019 18:24 — 29.07.2019 14:31 31.07.2019 06:32 — 31.07.2019 16:18
MOON WITHOUT COURSE IN FEBRUARY 2019	MOON WITHOUT COURSE IN AUGUST 2019
01.02.2019 01:33 — 01.02.2019 03:47 03.02.2019 13:53 — 03.02.2019 16:03 06.02.2019 02:59 — 06.02.2019 05:02 08.02.2019 01:14 — 08.02.2019 17:34 11.02.2019 02:48 — 11.02.2019 04:28 13.02.2019 01:26 — 13.02.2019 12:32 15.02.2019 15:48 — 15.02.2019 17:03 17.02.2019 17:17 — 17.02.2019 18:21 19.02.2019 16:51 — 19.02.2019 17:47 21.02.2019 04:52 — 21.02.2019 17:17 23.02.2019 18:11 — 23.02.2019 18:56 25.02.2019 15:14 — 26.02.2019 00:19 28.02.2019 09:17 — 28.02.2019 09:48	01.08.2019 23:48 — 02.08.2019 16:20 04.08.2019 07:27 — 04.08.2019 16:30 06.08.2019 10:36 — 06.08.2019 18:31 08.08.2019 17:58 — 08.08.2019 23:35 10.08.2019 22:50 — 11.08.2019 07:50 13.08.2019 01:11 — 13.08.2019 18:35 16.08.2019 04:02 — 16.08.2019 06:49 18.08.2019 01:34 — 18.08.2019 19:33 21.08.2019 07:06 — 21.08.2019 07:37 23.08.2019 00:33 — 23.08.2019 17:34 25.08.2019 09:58 — 26.08.2019 00:05 27.08.2019 11:55 — 28.08.2019 02:53 29.08.2019 03:07 — 30.08.2019 02:57 31.08.2019 11:46 — 01.09.2019 02:08
MOON WITHOUT COURSE IN MARCH 2019	MOON WITHOUT COURSE IN SEPTEMBER 2019
02.03.2019 21:47 — 02.03.2019 22:06 05.03.2019 11:05 — 05.03.2019 11:11 07.03.2019 22:08 — 07.03.2019 23:27 09.03.2019 20:14 — 10.03.2019 10:10 12.03.2019 12:31 — 12.03.2019 18:48 14.03.2019 15:31 — 15.03.2019 00:49 16.03.2019 21:03 — 17.03.2019 03:57 18.03.2019 18:19 — 19.03.2019 04:41 20.03.2019 18:22 — 21.03.2019 04:28 22.03.2019 21:10 — 23.03.2019 05:16 25.03.2019 05:24 — 25.03.2019 09:06 27.03.2019 05:37 — 27.03.2019 17:07 30.03.2019 03:05 — 30.03.2019 04:46	02.09.2019 11:34 — 03.09.2019 02:35 04.09.2019 13:58 — 05.09.2019 06:08 06.09.2019 19:03 — 07.09.2019 13:37 09.09.2019 11:30 — 10.09.2019 00:24 11.09.2019 08:22 — 12.09.2019 12:52 14.09.2019 07:33 — 15.09.2019 01:32 16.09.2019 19:03 — 17.09.2019 13:31 19.09.2019 16:57 — 19.09.2019 23:58 22.09.2019 05:41 — 22.09.2019 07:50 24.09.2019 01:05 — 24.09.2019 12:19 25.09.2019 19:14 — 26.09.2019 13:37 28.09.2019 06:58 — 28.09.2019 13:03 30.09.2019 05:06 — 30.09.2019 12:42
MOON WITHOUT COURSE IN APRIL 2019	MOON WITHOUT COURSE IN OCTOBER 2019
01.04.2019 06:02 — 01.04.2019 17:48 03.04.2019 18:36 — 04.04.2019 05:56 06.04.2019 05:15 — 06.04.2019 16:06 08.04.2019 11:29 — 09.04.2019 00:15 10.04.2019 20:27 — 11.04.2019 06:31 13.04.2019 02:33 — 13.04.2019 10:50 15.04.2019 04:38 — 15.04.2019 13:14 17.04.2019 07:29 — 17.04.2019 14:22 19.04.2019 14:12 — 19.04.2019 15:40 21.04.2019 07:00 — 21.04.2019 18:59 23.04.2019 14:43 — 24.04.2019 01:50 25.04.2019 22:48 — 26.04.2019 12:27 28.04.2019 12:44 — 29.04.2019 01:11	02.10.2019 12:46 — 02.10.2019 14:44 04.10.2019 10:34 — 04.10.2019 20:43 07.10.2019 02:25 — 07.10.2019 06:42 08.10.2019 21:27 — 09.10.2019 19:05 11.10.2019 12:55 — 12.10.2019 07:46 14.10.2019 00:59 — 14.10.2019 19:24 16.10.2019 11:37 — 17.10.2019 05:30 19.10.2019 05:14 — 19.10.2019 13:43 21.10.2019 15:39 — 21.10.2019 19:29 23.10.2019 12:14 — 23.10.2019 22:30 25.10.2019 16:00 — 25.10.2019 23:20 27.10.2019 11:22 — 27.10.2019 23:29 29.10.2019 20:34 — 30.10.2019 00:58
MOON WITHOUT COURSE IN MAY 2019	MOON WITHOUT COURSE IN NOVEMBER 2019
01.05.2019 00:57 — 01.05.2019 13:24 03.05.2019 11:47 — 03.05.2019 23:18 05.05.2019 18:10 — 06.05.2019 06:40 08.05.2019 02:50 — 08.05.2019 12:06 10.05.2019 05:06 — 10.05.2019 16:14 12.05.2019 15:24 — 12.05.2019 19:22 14.05.2019 20:19 — 14.05.2019 21:51 16.05.2019 12:37 — 17.05.2019 00:26 19.05.2019 00:11 — 19.05.2019 04:21 20.05.2019 20:05 — 21.05.2019 10:56 23.05.2019 06:58 — 23.05.2019 20:49 25.05.2019 15:51 — 26.05.2019 09:08 28.05.2019 07:21 — 28.05.2019 21:32 30.05.2019 18:08 — 31.05.2019 07:43	31.10.2019 17:29 — 01.11.2019 05:38 03.11.2019 08:46 — 03.11.2019 14:19 05.11.2019 17:37 — 06.11.2019 02:08 08.11.2019 04:13 — 08.11.2019 14:49 10.11.2019 17:00 — 11.11.2019 02:18 12.11.2019 18:48 — 13.11.2019 11:46 15.11.2019 14:40 — 15.11.2019 19:15 17.11.2019 23:14 — 18.11.2019 00:57 20.11.2019 00:11 — 20.11.2019 04:54 22.11.2019 06:31 — 22.11.2019 07:20 24.11.2019 05:49 — 24.11.2019 08:58 25.11.2019 20:30 — 26.11.2019 11:11 28.11.2019 13:50 — 28.11.2019 15:33 30.11.2019 06:57 — 30.11.2019 23:13
MOON WITHOUT COURSE IN JUNE 2019	MOON WITHOUT COURSE IN DECEMBER 2019
02.06.2019 01:53 — 02.06.2019 14:48 04.06.2019 18:42 — 04.06.2019 19:17 06.06.2019 17:10 — 06.06.2019 22:16 09.06.2019 00:23 — 09.06.2019 00:45 10.06.2019 15:01 — 11.06.2019 03:29 12.06.2019 18:15 — 13.06.2019 07:02 14.06.2019 22:46 — 15.06.2019 12:03 17.06.2019 11:31 — 17.06.2019 19:13 19.06.2019 14:19 — 20.06.2019 05:01 21.06.2019 17:02 — 22.06.2019 17:01 25.06.2019 02:10 — 25.06.2019 05:38 27.06.2019 10:51 — 27.06.2019 16:32 29.06.2019 21:38 — 30.06.2019 00:09

I remember that either in "Technology-Youth", or in "Quantum" (there were worthy times!) I read about the hollow moon hypothesis. At that time, this theory best explained the numerous anomalies associated with our satellite.

But even if the author of the hypothesis was wrong, it still follows from his conclusions that the Moon is an artificial object. It remains to prove this experimentally. Although some forces are clearly opposed to this. After all, launching satellites to Venus, Mars or Pluto is much more difficult than launching satellites to the Moon. Launching into the distance without having thoroughly studied the nearest neighbor does not seem quite logical.

Below is an incomprehensible picture from London Ru, allegedly taken with the help of a well-known Google program at the very moment of its launch. The authors captioned the photo as follows:

„You will not find this image either in the archives of NASA or in Roscosmos. What you see in the photo is a unique shot of the lock system, the entrance to the inner space of the moon.”.

Believe it or check it out)
Is the moon an artificially created object?

The Moon is Earth's closest neighbor in our Universe. Its diameter is slightly more than a quarter of the diameter of our planet. The spacecraft can overcome 384,400 km, which separates us from our satellite, in less than 3 days. The moon is a rocky spherical body, devoid of atmosphere and, apparently, life. This can be learned from school textbooks.

Here is what, for example, "Preliminary report on the flight of the Apollo 17 spacecraft" says. “The Apollo experiments, which aim to establish whether the Moon is a “living” planet or a “dead” planet, show that, compared to the Earth, the Moon is seismically calm ... Volcanism and other types of tectonic activity have been rare or absent during the last 2 -3 billion years. »

Official science prefers (I note that this is not an official theory, but only a preferred one) the following theory of the origin of the Moon:

Quote: “The moon and the earth were formed simultaneously by the union and compaction of a large swarm of small particles. But the Moon as a whole has a lower density than the Earth, so the substance of the protoplanetary cloud should have separated with the concentration of heavy elements in the Earth. In this regard, an assumption arose that the Earth was the first to form, surrounded by a powerful atmosphere enriched in relatively volatile silicates; during subsequent cooling, the substance of this atmosphere condensed into a ring of planetesimals, from which the Moon was formed ... "

Simply, this is the only possible option for the presence of the Moon in Earth orbit.

But if you carefully read the above theory, then I think, not being professors, you should have noticed in it a complete violation of the laws of physics. I'm not even talking about these very "planetesimals", apparently borrowed from Isaac Asimov or the Strugatskys, or from anyone else ...

After even if not the complete formation of the Earth, a gravitational field has already formed around it, which would attract these same planetesimals. So, there was no question of any formation of the Moon, and even of such a volume, near the Earth !!!

Where did this satellite come from on our planet? May not be the largest solar system, but the largest in relation to its planet. The density of the Moon also speaks of unusual conditions for the formation. It is 3.3 times the density of water, which is less than any of the terrestrial planets: Earth itself, Mercury, Venus and Mars, and analysis of lunar soil - the resulting age of 4.1 billion years - compared to 5, 5 billion years for the Earth - only confused scientists.

The fact that a stone lies on the surface of the Moon is a clear matter (a whole army of scientists examined samples of lunar soil in their earthly laboratories). What's under it? It would seem that everything is simple - on top of the crust, inside the mantle and the molten core. So it is, only in 1969, before Neil Armstrong landed on the moon, used fuel tanks of unmanned reconnaissance ships were dropped on its surface. Then a seismograph was also left here, which transmitted information about the fluctuations of the lunar crust.

After processing the data, scientists came to the conclusion that under the rocky surface is metal shell 30-40 km thick. Later, a computer analysis was made of the substance that this shell consists of. We received nickel, beryllium, tungsten, vanadium, some iron and some other elements. But the main discovery is such a shell, by no means could not form naturally.

No less surprised was the fact that under the shell, among other things, is 73.5 cubic kilometers of almost empty space. Evidence that there is a metal shell under the lunar surface is also the fact that most of the many kilometers of craters have an unusually flat bottom, like a frying pan. In other words, no matter how big or small the meteorite was, it left the same depth on the lunar surface!!!.

In the late 60s, Soviet researchers M. Vasin and A. Shcherbakov suggested that the Moon is an artificial object, a kind of spacecraft that was transported to the Earth, and that under its surface, at a depth of tens of kilometers, there is a huge habitable cavity about 50 km high, having an atmosphere suitable for its inhabitants, technical devices, etc. The lunar crust is a multi-kilometer protective shell for a cavity.

Back in the early 60s, astronomer Carl Sagan reported that special instruments had discovered under the lunar surface huge caves conditions that may be favorable for life. Some of them reach 100 cu. km. The director of the Main Observatory of the USSR in Pulkovo, Alexander Deutsch, expressed the same hypothesis at that time.

The hypothesis that the Moon is a giant spaceship that crashed and was forced into ancient times“Parking” to Earth for a “major overhaul” appeared for a reason. After all, natural space bodies with their multi-kilometer protective shell, some scientists believe, are the safest and most reliable vehicles for interplanetary travel.

And also unusual in the Moon is that it is somewhat large for a satellite. What if only one side is visible?

Well, it's clear with the unknown origin of the moon. And that means that it entails another topic. The theme of alien life. Who has no desire to discuss this topic ... then it is not at all clear why you are reading my exposé about the artificial origin of the moon? ...

... People have been studying an object called the Moon for a long time. Already in the 2nd century BC, Hipparchus spoke on this topic, in the 2nd century AD. — Claudius Ptolemy. Such pundits as Heraclitus, Aristotle, Galileo Kepler, Newton also had a hand in studying it ... the list goes on.

Ancient philosophers such as Heraclitus, Xenophon, and Thales seriously believed that intelligent life existed on the moon. And they did not even hesitate to speak and write about it in their treatises. Diogenes Laertes wrote that Heraclitus from Pontus spoke about his acquaintance with one descended "Selenite". Neocles of Croton believed that an egg once fell from the moon, containing a woman.

Johannes Kepler in his book “Discourse with a Starry Messenger” wrote about the population of the Moon: “They dig huge areas, surrounding them with dug soil, maybe to get moisture from the depths; and so, below, behind the dug hills, they hide in the shade and inside, in accordance with the movement of the Sun, they walk around, following the shadow, and this depression represents something like an underground city, where the houses are private caves dug in this circular rotation , and in the middle - fields and pastures, so that avoiding the Sun, not to go far from food ... "

Back in the 18th century, astronomer William Herschel first drew the attention of scientists to the lights, lines and geometric shapes on the surface of the moon. Since then, anomalous phenomena on its surface have been observed constantly.

Already in our time, having been systematically observing the Moon with an 800x telescope for more than 10 years, the Japanese Yatsuo Mitsushima repeatedly filmed the passages of dark objects over different parts of the Moon with a video camera. The materials he received are sensational: the diameter of objects is on average about 20 kilometers, and the speed of movement is about 200 kilometers per second.

In preparation for landing a man on the moon, a detailed study of its surface was carried out by photographing with the help of spacecraft. NASA specialists received more than 140,000 photographs. Most of them are of excellent quality, and the optical resolution of the equipment made it possible to find something on the Moon that we were completely unprepared for ...

In 1977, a book by a certain J. Leonard was published in the UK with a sensational title: “There is someone else on our moon” and the subtitle: “Discovered amazing facts intelligent life on the moon. Who is hiding under the pseudonym J. Leonard? Unknown. In any case, this is a well-informed person who managed to gain access to extensive, including top-secret information.

Thirty-five photographs, each accompanied by a NASA code number, dozens of detailed drawings, according to the author, made from high-quality large-format NASA photographs published in this book, expert statements and an extensive bibliography lead the reader to a stunning conclusion: NASA and many scientists from around the world name know for many years that there are signs of intelligent life on the moon!

Analyzing the images transmitted by Ranger-7 after its safe landing near the crater and taken by astronauts from low orbit while flying around the Moon, the author, like NASA experts, came to an unequivocal conclusion: there are numerous mechanisms and structures on the surface of the moon.

According to J. Leonard, most of these huge mechanisms have been destroyed, but others clearly continue to work. Some objects change their shape, disappear or reappear on the slopes or bottom of a crater. The greatest activity is observed on the visible side of the moon. So, in the zone of King's crater there is a large number of mechanical devices, called by the author "X-Drones", because they resemble the letter "X" in shape. These "excavators" a mile and a half in size develop the slopes of the crater, breaking off the rocky soil and throwing it to the surface.

J. Leonard believes that a pipeline about three miles long was laid from the crest of the King crater, the ends of which are covered with identical caps. Similar structures were discovered by the Japanese explorer Mitsui and described in the book Explorations of the Moon.

J. Leonard's book contains many impressive descriptions of various mechanisms towering above the surface of the Moon and tracking the movement of the Sun.

“Seven miles from Bulliald, Ranger 7 took unique pictures. A metal large object, partly in shadow, has a rounded shape, a cylinder and a turret on its top. Holes are visible on the cylinder at an equal distance from each other. Mist or steam comes out of the turret. Identification marks are visible on the objects.

Does the lunar technological activity relation to UFOs? An analysis of NASA photographs and some statements by astronauts give an affirmative answer to this question.

J. Leonard quotes astronaut Gordon ("Apollo 15"): “When we passed 30-40 feet, a mass of objects flew nearby - so white and sparkling, they clearly had an engine”.

American astronauts had code words for Houston in case they found something unusual on or near the moon, for example: "Anibel" means a sparkling fire on or near the moon, "Barbara" is a structure, "Saint Nicholas" is a UFO .

"Anibel" was observed by astronauts in the Sea of Crises. 2- and 3-storey rectangular structures were also found here, and the upper floor was a similar rectangle, but smaller. Sometimes at the base of the lower rectangle one could see large round holes arranged in a row at the same distance from each other.

At the bottom of the Copernicus crater is a structure in the form of a triangle placed on the base. On its lateral surface, one can distinguish signs resembling numbers and geometric figures. As for the signs, on the surface of the Moon, judging by the photographs, one can find luminous (possibly in the reflected light of the Sun) signs, for example, in the form of blue crosses installed vertically in the ground.

Usually the same sign is installed in those places where there are mechanisms united by some one technological function. So, near the craters in which X-Drones operate, blue crosses are installed. In other places, signs in the form of an arrow are visible.

J. Leonard believes that the King crater and its environs can be something like the base of another civilization, since it is there that platforms are located that rise above the surface on 0.5 miles. Many of them are across 6 to 10 miles. It is difficult for us on Earth to imagine structures of this size.

It is impossible not to mention the highly controversial assumption of J. Leonard: “Large areas of the surface are covered with the remains of something resembling a camouflage net of cables intersecting at right angles. Maybe once the surface of the Moon was disguised with the help of dust, pebbles, rubble and artificial craters under an ordinary planet? Now we see the remnants of disguise after the cataclysm on the moon".

It is the cataclysm that explains the researcher such a large destruction of mechanisms, pipelines and structures. To a large extent, this is supported by NASA photographs. Pipe systems have been discovered, laid on the surface and descending the slope of the crater to go deep into the moon. However, many pipelines have been destroyed…

…"Wow! - could not contain his surprise astronaut Harrison Schmitt, the pilot of the Apollo 17 lunar module already on the first revolution around the moon, - I just saw a flash on the lunar surface! The next day, during the fourteenth revolution around the moon, it was the turn to be surprised by another pilot of Apollo! 7— Ronald Evans: "Well! You know I would never believe! I am right above the edge of the Eastern Sea. I just looked down and saw a bright flash with my own eyes!”

When one of the most serious authorities in the field of the physical and geological nature of the Moon, Dr. Farouk El-Baz, consultant and assistant to many American astronauts, was asked to comment on these observations, his answer was quite categorical: “There is no doubt that this is something grandiose: these are not comets, and this not natural origin!".

It could be assumed that meteors were observed against the background of the Moon, burning up in the Earth's atmosphere. However, at the same time as E. Louville, the famous E. Halley observed similar outbreaks in the same region of the Moon in the British Isles. Is it worth explaining that the same meteors burning at a height of several kilometers above the Earth cannot be seen against the background of the same region of the Moon at the same time in London and Paris?

And in the library of the Royal Astronomical Society there is a lot of information about strange light spots and fluctuations of light on the moon. For example, astronomers have long been attracted to the strange light that periodically appears in lunar craters. Especially often in the craters Plato and Aristarchus. Often moving objects are observed in the Seas of Crises and Tranquility. Thus, in the region of the latter in 1964, at least four light or dark spots were seen, moving tens and even hundreds of kilometers in a few hours.

On September 11, 1967, within 8-9 seconds, Canadian scientists recorded a dark rectangular spot with purple edges here, which was clearly visible until it entered the night region. And after 13 minutes. in the direction of the spot, near the crater Sabine, there was a flash of yellow light. And apparently, it was not by chance that Apollo 11 landed in this zone a year and a half later. The study of the lunar soil at the landing site surprised even the experts. It was melted and, according to Professor T. Gold, with energy 100 times more powerful than the Sun emits. What this source was is unknown. Experts believe that he was at a low altitude above the moon.

In 1968, NASA published a catalog of puzzling lunar sightings in its Chronological Catalog of Lunar Event Reports. Over the 4 centuries that the catalog covers, 579 examples were recorded that science has not yet given an explanation for: moving luminous objects (just points and even entire columns of light), disappearing craters, colored trenches lengthening at a speed of 6 km / h, giant domes that change their color; a large luminous object, called the "Maltese Cross", observed on November 26, 1956, a strange gas appearing above the surface of the Moon, etc. The Catalog also recorded the speed of movement of the above-mentioned spots in the Sea of Tranquility - from 32 to 80 km / h.

One of the most interesting recent observations belongs to a Japanese amateur astronomer. Our television has repeatedly played a video recording of a shadow that he made with a telescope quickly moving across the surface of the moon. If this is not a hoax, then the size of the shadow (about 20 km in diameter) and the enormous speed of its movement (for 2 seconds the shadow traveled about 400 km) allow us to speak of a high technical level of the object.

Also on April 25, 1972, the Passau observatory recorded on photographic film in the region of the craters Aristarchus and Herodotus a grandiose “light fountain”, which reached a height of 162 km at a speed of 1.35 km / s, shifted to the side by 60 km and disappeared.

Scientists are desperately trying to find the natural cause of lunar phenomena, but so far without much success. At the same time, there is a rather unexpected point of view on everything that happens. “They (scientists,” writes J. Leonard, “disregard (consciously or unconsciously) the simple truth, which is that the phenomena of lunar phenomena are associated with inhabitants on the Moon who carry out their purposeful activities.”

What speaks in favor of such a bold hypothesis? Much, very much! For example, strange objects resembling some kind of mechanisms. The purpose of some devices can be guessed from the changes in the lunar surface that they leave. For example, the edges of some craters are destroyed by something that moves along them in a spiral (this is reminiscent of our giant open pit mines).

Many craters, especially on the far side of the Moon, have a pronounced polygonal shape, which has not yet been explained. During the flight around the moon of Apollo 14, the astronauts took a very interesting photo. This is a clear image of a giant mechanical device, later called the "superdevice-1971". Two light and openwork (metal?) structures stand inside one of the craters. And without casting any shadow. From their base stretch long cords. According to rough estimates, the size of the device is 1-1.5 miles (1.6-2.4 km).

Repeatedly there are mechanisms similar to a scoop for capturing soil (they were called "T-scoops"). To the east of the Smith Sea, on the far side of the Moon, near Sanger Crater, there is an area where you can see the results of their work: the device has already removed a huge section of the central slide and is on the edge, continuing to work. Heaps of cobblestones pile up nearby.

One can only speculate what these mechanisms are used for: the search for raw materials, construction work, the elimination of defects in the lunar crust, archaeological tasks, the extraction of gas to create an artificial atmosphere? almost a ton of oxygen. This reserve is enough for an earthling for 3 years! "Isn't that why THEY destroy mountain ranges? asks J. Leonard.

Objects that move, leaving a trail behind them, look very impressive in the pictures. In NASA they are conditionally called "cobblestones". J. Leonard claims that American astronauts examined 34 such tracks in the Apollo 17 landing area. The length of the tracks varied from 100 m to 2.5 km. The width reached 16 m. As a rule, they were grouped in 8-10. Most of the objects they referred to were 20-30% wider than the tracks themselves. Some were oblong and the size of a room. How could they sometimes roll on an almost horizontal surface? And another mysterious fact: of the 34 traces examined, only 8 ended in boulders. What left other traces?

US military consultant William Cooper in 1989 published an article in the Razvitie newspaper in which he tells how at one time alien ships accompanied every launch and landing of Americans on the moon.

The life of the lunar natives was filmed by the participants of the Apollo mission: “Domes and vaults, gabled roofs, tall round structures, like the letter T, mining machines that leave stitch-like marks on the surface of the Moon, huge or very small spaceships aliens."

Information about encounters with UFOs in lunar orbit is also found in Soviet secret archives. There is a recording of a conversation between Neil Armstrong and Baz Aldrin with a base in Houston. The astronauts are quite explicit about the fact that in front of them are the ships of other creatures, and the creatures themselves are watching them.

And in conclusion, I would like to cite the amazing words of Neil Armstrong. And although he later refused them, his negotiations were heard by many American radio amateurs.

Armstrong: "What is this? What the hell is the matter? I would like to know the truth, what is it?

NASA: "What's happening? Is something wrong?

Armstrong: "Here are large objects, sir! Huge! Oh my God! There are other spaceships here! They are on the other side of the crater! They are on the moon and watching us!”

Wasn't this the main reason that ALL projects for flights to the moon were curtailed then - after all, it was already busy !!!

P .S: Our generation is convinced that seemingly unshakable stereotypes can be destroyed in the shortest possible time, and we are gradually weaning ourselves from categorical judgments. Although sometimes we continue to presumptuously and arrogantly ridicule what does not fit into our usual earthly standards.

And when analyzing lunar phenomena, we must change our way of thinking, free ourselves from blinkered perception ...

The hypothesis that the moon is hollow inside is far from new. In his 1901 novel "First Men on the Moon" the great H. G. Wells (1866–1946), known to many as the father of science fiction, wrote about the epic trip to the moon. The main characters of the novel are surprised to learn that the Moon is not at all what it seems from the Earth. In fact, it is hollow and inhabited by a strange alien race. Its representatives are similar to insects.

Seismographs on the Moon

Such fantasies were very bold for a novel published in 1901. However, once humans started over 60 years later, the concept of a hollow moon was further developed.

Buzz Aldrin next to the Apollo 11 seismometer. (Image credit: Neil Armstrong/NASA)

Why did this happen? During the lunar landings, astronauts deployed several seismographs on the lunar surface. These instruments are designed to register movements and vibrations. Seismographs remained on the lunar surface to collect data on activity on the Moon. The instruments that were installed during the missions 12, 14, 15 and 16 transmitted information to Earth via radio until they were simply turned off. Due to financial savings. It happened in 1977.

Schematic diagram of the Apollo seismometer. (NASA image)

These data revealed a lot about the Moon and its internal structure. In particular, they reported the existence of moonquakes. These events have been divided into four categories:
1. Deep moonquakes (700 km below the surface);
2. Vibrations (caused by meteorite impacts);
3. Thermal moonquakes;
4. Small moonquakes (20-30 km below the surface).

It was these last small moonquakes that led to the emergence of the hollow moon hypothesis. It is said that during these events the moon "rang like a bell". This expression first appeared in an article written for Popular Science in March 1970. The phrase was used frequently after the flight of Apollo 12. During its execution, a 2.5-ton take-off stage was purposefully dropped onto the lunar surface.

The duration and severity of the seismic disturbance caused by the impact surprised seismologists. They heard strong signals that lasted more than an hour and a half after the impact, and weaker signals that were recorded for an hour after the impact. Not surprisingly, using such information, some people have drawn the appropriate conclusions. The moon, in their opinion, may not be as solid as official science claims.

The moon is a spaceship

Closely intertwined with the hollow moon hypothesis is another fantasy. Some highly respected scientists of the last century have stated that the Moon is an alien. It is known as the Vasin-Shcherbakov theory.

In an article by Mikhail Vasin and Alexander Shcherbakov, published by them in 1970, it was suggested that the Moon is actually an artificial hollow satellite of the Earth, which was placed in Earth orbit by some unknown creatures. Vasin and Shcherbakov, it should be noted, were members of the USSR Academy of Sciences. However, the article was not published in scientific journal, and in the publication "Sputnik" . It was a kind of Soviet literary digest . In their article, scientists did not write anything about exactly what type of unknown creatures placed an artificial satellite in Earth's orbit. Basically, it described the materials of which the moon is composed. They had to withstand both extreme heat and cold and be extremely durable to withstand impact.

There is a myth that the article states the following: mica, uranium, brass were discovered during lunar missions ( man-made alloy) and neptunium (a radioactive element that does not exist in nature). They were allegedly found in samples brought to Earth by the Apollo missions. But this is not in the original article. And in general, this is not true. Unfortunately, not everything you read on the Internet can be trusted...

Alan Shepard on the Moon. (Image: Edgar Mitchell/NASA)

Now let's look at some scientific facts about the moon. This will allow us to expand our knowledge about it and help us understand whether the two theories described above have the right to life.

What is the moon made of?

Unfortunately Luna. Of course, this may come as a blow to some. But it's time to find out the truth. The moon is not a giant cheddar sphere. However, it has a crust, a mantle, and a core. Like the Earth.

Scientists have found that the moon has a core similar to the earth's. It is rich in iron and has a radius of about 240 kilometers. It is surrounded by a liquid outer core. Its estimated radius is 330 kilometers. The core of the Moon differs from the core of the Earth in that it has a partially melted boundary layer. This layer is estimated to have a radius of about 480 kilometers.

But how did the researchers get this information? NASA made these discoveries using state-of-the-art seismological techniques and applied them to data from the first lunar landings. People who claim that the results of seismographs left on the Moon say that it is hollow are wrong. The results show that the moon is solid with a complex internal structure!

The Moon's mantle is believed to be composed of the minerals olivine, orthopyroxene, and clinopyroxene. In fact, the composition of the Moon's mantle is very similar to that of the Earth's. However, the Moon's mantle is believed to be richer in iron.

iron proof

Well, in the end there is physical property matter, like density. The average density of the Moon is about 3.3 g/cm3. It is calculated very simply. The mass of the Moon is derived from the force of the gravitational interaction of the Earth-Moon system. Volume is also easy to calculate. Divide mass by volume. All. We know the density of the moon. The resulting value makes the Moon the second most dense satellite in the solar system after . Such a density seems unlikely for an object that is hollow inside.

Scientists know of fossil evidence for the existence of tides on Earth, generated by the moon. Their age is measured in hundreds of millions of years. The dating of samples returned from the Moon shows that its surface is at least 4.4 billion years old. All these facts indicate to us that the Moon is solid and ancient. And it's been here for a long time...

The Hollow Moon theory can be safely packaged along with the Martian canals, the planet Vulcan and the satellite and thrown into the "space conspiracy trash can."

The Moon is the unchanging and so familiar to every person satellite of the Earth. It seems that we know everything about him: size, weight, soil composition. Even amateur astronomers have the opportunity to observe it in their telescopes, not to mention the fact that in the 60s of the last century people landed on the surface of the moon.

However, if you look closely at the known facts, questions arise that cannot be answered by adhering to the only version of the formation of the Moon as a result of natural processes.

For example, some of them:

1. The period of rotation of the Moon around its axis is equal to the period of its revolution around the Earth. Thus, the Moon is always turned to the Earth on one side. Such a coincidence looks almost unbelievable.

2. Usually the orbit of rotation of one cosmic body around another is elliptical. The moon's orbit around the earth is circular, which is strange. In addition, the shape of the Moon itself is unusually round.

3. The mass and dimensions of this satellite are known, so its density can be calculated. But the resulting value is incredibly small, which leads to a possible conclusion about the presence of voids in the body of the Moon.

Short video from additional questions relative to the moon

When comparing these and many other data, the conclusion suggests itself about the artificial formation of our satellite. But who made it, when and why?

We will try to figure out the questions of the origin of the Moon and the functions it performs.

Question. What is the origin of the Moon, the satellite of the Earth?

Answer. This is an artificial and non-random origin.

Q. Who made it?

A. Civilization, Higher Mind.

Q. Who is meant by this, these are extraterrestrial civilizations?

A. Extraterrestrial civilizations.

Q. Can you clarify what kind of extraterrestrial civilization (EC)?

A. Such information that the Sumerians are the descendants of the lunar inhabitants.

Q. Why are the Sumerians descendants? Maybe the Sumerians were given knowledge?

A. The Sumerian civilization has something to do with it. Such information that the Sumerians are descendants of the lunar civilization.

Q. Is there any separate civilization on the Moon?

A. We can say that the Moon is a satellite and it is a manned station.

Q. Is the moon a habitable station of some civilization? What is this civilization?

A. It has something to do with the Milky Way galaxy, I can't say for sure.

Q. For what purpose was it created?

A. To some extent, this is the protector of the Earth. Keeps it in a certain orbit and in a certain position in order to avoid death.

Q. So it is the Moon holding the Earth?

Q. Was it specially built by the EC to help the Earth?

A. Land is used for certain purposes. It has to do with energy. This energy moves from the Earth to the Moon and does not return back. It absorbs somehow the energy of the Earth. A simple example: ebb and flow. There is no interaction... There is some kind of competent distribution of energy.

Q. Is it something to do with gravity?

A. With gravity, with getting energy.

Q. They could not use the energy of, for example, Mars? All planets have gravity.

A. Earth is the only inhabited planet in the solar system. And this satellite arose when the Earth needed it. The moon is not as ancient as it is believed. There is no mention of this satellite in ancient manuscripts and observations of ancient astronomers.

Q. How old is the moon?

A. Approximately 13 thousand years.

Q. There is life on the planet, so the Moon appeared. What's the point? The moon appeared to help earthlings?

A. The land provides the CC with some necessary resources. Sputnik is a transshipment base. Certain rocks are mined, energy is obtained. All this is done in such a way as not to harm the planet.

Q. Wouldn't it be easier just to destroy us?

A. If they wanted to destroy it, they would have destroyed it long ago.

Q. Why didn't they destroy it?

A. Because it is more profitable for them that everything should remain in the same state as it is now. The resources that are being used are on Earth, because the Earth is inhabited, because there is a certain chain on Earth that creates the most favorable conditions for such research and activities.

Q. And if we could not provide them with such resources, would they destroy us?

A. They have no such purpose.

Q. Are they a friendly civilization?

Q. And what kind of chain is this?

A. Biosphere, atmosphere, weather conditions, water resources. This is what is on Earth in this state. Underground resources, water, air - all this is used. The most important resource is water. The subsoil hidden under the thickness of the ocean depths is a resource that is no longer found on other planets in the solar system. Therefore, they do not need to change anything.

Q. And if we started to interfere with them, would they destroy us?

A. All attempts at interference are stopped. We do not pose a threat to them with our level of development.

Q. Don't they understand that if we treat the Earth this way, we ourselves will soon destroy it?

A. Then another civilization will be created. Everything will follow the same chain.

Q. Are they the ones who destroyed civilizations?

A. No one destroyed civilizations, they destroyed themselves, having reached a certain technical level. No one deliberately destroys.

Q. And how do we influence by our presence that such conditions are maintained? Doesn't nature support itself?

A. There is a certain chain here. One cannot exist without the other, therefore any intervention, any violation will lead to irreversible consequences and to certain changes and death. Their task is to prevent this. Therefore, if possible, they are not allowed to go where they do not need to. They intervene in events that can seriously affect the current state of affairs.

Q. How do they interfere?

A. As an example, the prevention of a nuclear attack, which almost took place at the height of the Cold War in the 60s, when the system already practically worked and in an incredible way everything was prevented.

Q. And who pressed the button, what is the story?

O. Russia. A signal about a launched missile from the United States was intercepted and the operator who observed this picture acted according to instructions. But the signal was false and the system was almost launched, but in an incomprehensible way it failed and the launch did not take place. As it turned out later, this signal was false. At the moment when this was happening, unidentified flying objects were seen over the territory of the test site.

Also the Tunguska meteorite. Chelyabinsk meteorite.

Q. Were these meteorites shot down?

Oh yeah. And why all the other planets of the solar system are subjected to a powerful attack of meteorites, asteroids, comets. With the Earth, this practically does not happen, and if it happens, then this is not fatal for the planet. The conclusion suggests itself. There are forces that prevent such catastrophes.

Video about the fall of the Chelyabinsk meteorite

Q. Does this EC have any mercantile goals? They keep us, roughly speaking, like cows?

A. They use the main rule or law of the cosmos - do no harm. They receive, but they also give, and it is mutually beneficial.

Q. How was the Moon created?

A. This is a natural body, created naturally, but refined and improved.

Q. Is it some kind of metal structure?

A. More like a titanium base. This meteorite damage that the Moon receives is not fatal and is minor. The composition of the soil contains nickel, beryllium. The fact that it is hollow inside, all scientists involved in the study of the moon agreed on this.

Q. Is it part of the Earth or is it pulled in from somewhere?

A. Including there are fragments of the Earth. Initially, it was a natural celestial body in the solar system. As a result of an explosion, a collision on a planetary scale billions of years ago, the Moon broke away from the Earth and began to wander around the solar system. It contains parts not only of the Earth, but also of other celestial bodies.

Q. Why was the Moon drawn to the Earth at all?

A. It has already been said. This is a kind of guardian, protector. Keeps the Earth in a certain orbit.

Q. Does it protect the Earth as a resource or life on Earth?

Oh. And this and that.

Q. Is there one EC on the Moon or several different ones?

Q. They don't let other civilizations in there?

A. The control is carried out by one, but as a transshipment base it is used by others.

Video of an unidentified object above the surface of the moon

Q. Was it said earlier that there are manuscripts that are over 13,000 years old? Are they known?

A. Yes, they are known. Manuscripts associated with the description of celestial bodies, with astrology.

Q. But the extant manuscripts date back to a shorter time.

A. There are certain recorded data that go back over 6,000 years. There are such artifacts and they are known to science. It's just that a lot is hidden and not widely distributed, but the data about this is known. A lot of things that now defy logic and explanation, are not built into a certain system of scientific assumptions, are hidden and hushed up. All this is done consciously. A lot of assumptions and conjectures, because not all the facts are known.

Q. Manuscripts - maybe not a written version? Some kind of artifact carved in stone?

A. Yes, information of any kind.

Q. There is evidence that the Vedas were memorized and passed down from generation to generation. How could knowledge be preserved?

Oh yeah. Why is there still a tradition of transferring knowledge from teacher to student? And everything is transmitted exactly without distortion, as it was composed at the beginning. In order for there to be no deviations and be interpreted as it was transmitted. It is important for the teacher to cut off the superfluous and leave the basics. Why, for example, such a teaching as yoga has a lot of deviations and branches, because some moments were taken as a basis and overgrown with some new variations that go sideways, which lead away from the essence when this teaching came to people with a Western type of thinking .This gave rise to transformation and distortion. Therefore, what is taught in the West and has a primary basis is not always the same. Therefore, control is important here in the form of a living teacher who knows and understands.

Q. And why was the word manuscript mentioned?

A. There is probably such evidence.

Q. Where do they exist?

A. In India, in South America, in North Africa.

Q. Is there one in Russia?

A. What is hidden under the ice.

Q. Is it something on paper?

A. It's not paper. This type of information transfer is not sustainable. It's something more solid. It is encased in stone as a carrier of information.

Q. Does the main civilization on the moon have its own planet?

A. In any case, it definitely was. Now there is also.

Q. Why don't they make contact with earthlings?

A. There is contact, but humanity is not quite ready in the consciousness in which it is now for that flow of information and knowledge, because the spiritual level of development does not allow it. Because we can harm not only ourselves, but possibly them as well. There are contacts, but with a limited circle of initiates.

Q. Who is in this circle?

A. It has to do with several governments.

Q. Does the EC contact governments?

A. A certain group of persons - contactees, which is controlled.

Q. Do they give any advice?

A. Some kind of technology.

Q. Do these states know exactly what this EC provides?

Q. These countries include Russia, China, America?

Q. What technologies did they give to Russia?

A. Technologies related to alternative energy sources.

V. Russia is unprofitable to apply because of the oil.

A. There are active developments in this area. There are results, but they are artificially restrained.

Q. And what was given to America?

A. Wireless. Everything related to phones, computers, the Internet.

Q. This civilization that now controls the Moon, did it participate in the creation of people on Earth?

Q. Can you name what kind of civilization this is?

Q. Is this civilization mining gold on Earth?

A. Including, yes.

Q. Why do they need gold?

A. This is related to technology, rather for conductors.

Q. It has been said that the Sumerians are the descendants of the lunar inhabitants. Did the Sumerians know that they were descendants of a lunar civilization?

Q. Did the Americans land on the moon in the 1960s?

Q. Why were the studies curtailed then?

A. Rather for security purposes. They were given to understand that there is nothing for earthlings to do here yet.

Q. Did the Americans understand this hint?

Q. Were they shown something? What exactly?

A. Not only did the astronauts see, but unidentified flying objects were seen from the Earth, which hovered and controlled everything that was happening.

Q. That is, the Americans understood for sure that the EC was warning them?

Oh yeah. And all attempts to delve into research have failed. These works are curtailed so far, but there are plans. A lot of information is hidden intentionally. Something that the governments of several countries know about.

Q. The footage that was made by the Americans on the moon, are they fake?

A. They are real.

B. The dimensions of the Moon and the Sun are such that they appear to be the same when the Moon covers the Sun at solar eclipse. Is this a coincidence?

Q. Why was this done?

A. Simply put, for a certain balance. For the climate, the atmosphere that we have now. It's controlled in a certain way.

B. The orbit of rotation of one body around another is usually elliptical. The Moon's orbit around the Earth is circular. What is it for?

A. In order to maintain the cyclicity that exists now on Earth. The trajectory is an unwinding spiral having a round shape. And the planet itself is almost a perfect ball. Including, this is because it does not have any basis - the Moon is hollow inside.

Q. There are so-called seas on the surface of the Moon, scientists assume that they were formed from the flowing lava, is that right?

Oh yeah. Once it was a celestial body, there were red-hot rocks.

Q. On the moon, traces of the movement of stones are found, at the end of the trace there is a stone, as if it moved independently. Why is this happening?

A. This is energy work. The energy that comes from the Earth to the Moon is distributed in a certain way. What happens inside is reflected on the surface. Thanks to this, stones move. This also happens on Earth. This is related, among other things, to magnetic field. You can take a table, put a metal object on top, and move a magnet from below. The object above will also move. It's pretty much the same principle.

Q. Is it accidental that the Moon always faces the Earth on the same side?

A. Not by chance. The main points of penetration into the structure of the Moon, the main foothold, are on the opposite side.

Q. On the Moon, astronomers from the Earth periodically observe flashes, some flying objects, what is it?

A. These are aircraft. Flashes are associated with the work of energy.

Q. Are the pyramids that exist on Earth energy transmitters?

A. Pyramids work as specific antennas for transmitting and receiving information, energy, and so on.

Q. And in particular, how is energy transferred to the Moon?

A. It has something to do with accumulation solar energy which is used by the satellite. High tide in the evening, low tide usually in the morning.

Q. The earth draws in solar energy, and the moon pulls it on itself?

Q. What about gravity?

Oh. Gravity too. It all comes down to the accumulation and use of solar energy.

Q. Does the force of gravity depend on density?

Q. Will there be additional information?

A. Not yet.

Film: Luna. secret zone

If you notice a spelling mistake, please highlight it with the mouse and click Ctrl+Enter.

Free subscription

Each subscriber receives a free video seminar "I won't give up" (on how to get out of a state of stress with the help of practices, concentrate your inner potential and achieve your goal).
To subscribe to regular site updates, enter your name, email and click the "Subscribe" button.

Club site "Psychic Speaks"

You can join the "Psychic Speaks" Site Club. Access is provided for 1 year, its cost is 990 rubles or the equivalent in US dollars.

By purchasing this access you will receive:

the opportunity to additionally read the most interesting readings in closed access;
+ BONUS - 50% discount on all products posted on the site in the "Shop" section in electronic form;
+ BONUS - participation in a webinar held once a month by Kairat Kinibaev on topics of interest.

You will also receive a monthly newsletter about the most interesting entries from the closed section. You can get access.

56 comments on “The Unknown Side of the Moon”

# 1 Kamrad(=

27.05.2013 | 06:42

# 2 admin

27.05.2013 | 09:24

Interestingly, the famous esotericist of the last century, Gurdjieff, also wrote about the redistribution of energy from the Earth to the Moon.
Quote from In Search of the Miraculous:
“Organic life on Earth feeds the Moon. All life on Earth - people, animals, plants - serves as food for the moon. The moon is huge Living being, which feeds on everything that lives and grows on Earth. The Moon could not exist without organic life on Earth, just as organic life on Earth could not exist without the Moon. Moreover, in relation to organic life on Earth, the Moon is a gigantic electromagnet. If the action of this electromagnet suddenly ceased, organic life would crumble to dust.

27.05.2013 | 09:34

# 4 Copernic

The gold… just glimpsed, was there a hint of the Anunnaki? Maybe Nieburu is really already around? What do you think?

27.05.2013 | 09:48

# 5 Greenwald

*that the CC controlled the fall of the meteorite.*
First, what VC? And secondly, what meteorite?
But shhh 😉
Uncles in strict suits, they are watching everyone.

*If the action of this electromagnet were to suddenly stop, organic life would crumble to dust*
Yes, as if the offset of the fields. Life here is formed in the form it is, thanks to the moon.
Only electromagnets have nothing to do with it. It's more of a waveguide.

27.05.2013 | 09:52

# 6 Kamrad(=

It turned out that this was in the comments to the article “The Sixth Sense” (site/4104)

>#5 Copernic:
>…YES: There is a video of a meteorite flying and being hit by a UFO. It's fake?
>A: Yes, it's fake...

And in my memory it came up like reading Kairat, because it was on the site. So I'm sorry that I screwed up a little.

27.05.2013 | 09:58

# 7 Misha

Kairat, thanks for reading.
By posting information, you are balancing on the edge.

The good news is that when the oil runs out, everything will be okay, because the technology exists.
Another thing I don’t understand is how, having information about such technologies, those people who participate in this (and there are probably dozens, or even hundreds of them) are silent and do not say a word. Is fear so strong?

27.05.2013 | 14:09

# 8 copernic

Regarding technology. I think there are many reasons. But the main ones are a banal thirst for quick profit on the one hand and an understanding of the mechanisms of the economy on the other. Regarding the first reason, everything is clear here. But the economy is something else. Just imagine what will happen to the economies of countries where exports are the main energy resources? It will collapse to hell, and pull the world economy with it. Roughly, of course, but somehow. Such technologies should be introduced slowly, in stages, taking into account many factors.

27.05.2013 | 16:10

# 9 Misha

copernic, these are all fairy tales for weak minds.

After all, you can at least patent a new technology for generating electricity, and then the money will go into the pocket of the inventors.

Another issue is that all the governments of countries are in collusion and oil is easier to control. There is a mining difficulty factor here. And almost everyone agrees with the statement that oil is expensive because it is difficult to extract.

27.05.2013 | 16:13

# 10 Greenwald

Are you laughing. In the Caucasus, a bunch of these private mini-factories were blown up. You stick a pipe, immediately distill the distillation into gasoline, and pump as much as you like. She herself is rushing from the ground.
Very difficult, yes.

And it does not end, it is also a myth and fairy tales. Evidence, documentation for any field .. how much was calculated, and how much is already being pumped .. and how much more will be pumped. In the same Tatarstan, for example.

27.05.2013 | 16:21

# 11 copernic

Of course, the easiest way is to blame everything on a global conspiracy 🙂

27.05.2013 | 16:33

# 12 copernic

What about patents and inventions? Somewhere in the late 90s in the newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda there was a big article about a Russian inventor who created a working internal combustion engine that runs on any liquid. I don't remember the details, but there was a photo of him and a lot of details. I only remember that the inventor talked with humor about testing the engine on various mixtures of liquids, but it worked most efficiently on urine ... And this was not the first of April. And somewhere about 5-6 years ago there was a TV transmission about a villager who modified the crankshaft in his car, significantly increasing the efficiency ... I don’t remember the numbers, but they were impressive. Well, where is all this? Now no one needs it, and someone is so unnecessary that they can do everything so that it does not go into production, etc.

27.05.2013 | 16:50

# 13 Greenwald

*easiest way to blame everything on a global conspiracy*
Not global. Iran is told not to download much, but they don't care. They say that everything is based on the petrodollar.
Iran does not comply, and Osmania does the same. They say we won’t let competitors in .. and where Osmania is, there is Russia .. etc.
As a result, a barrel of Brand today is $94.15.
It remains to wait until it collapses altogether. And what will happen next.. 🙂

27.05.2013 | 16:51

# 14 Copernic

Greenwald, a bit off topic, if you don't mind. I recently watched a few episodes on Discovery about a magician-illusionist dynamo. Could it be that he really uses superpowers? Or am I too trusting))) although the only reasonable explanation in my opinion is stupid staging and video editing. For I cannot explain how he predicted the outcome of several football matches, while making a bet of 1: 10,000.

27.05.2013 | 19:12

# 15 Copernic

I apologize for changing the topic, just emotions over the edge after what I saw 🙂

27.05.2013 | 19:13

# 16 Chit

27.05.2013 | 20:08

# 17 Misha

*that oil is expensive because it is difficult to extract.*
“Are you laughing?”

Greenwald, so I'm talking about the fact that the myth is planted in the head on purpose. All sorts of programs there, how difficult it is to do (by discovery), what expensive platforms, specialists, delivery, etc.
Everything is surrounded by the endless myth of “gasolinetadoraga”

27.05.2013 | 20:25

# 18 Copernic

Chit, you're probably right. But I so want to believe. In any case, only positive emotions!! For this respect, even if the installation)))

27.05.2013 | 21:22

28.05.2013 | 13:01

# 20 Zabava

#19 AL:)))
In general, after reading, goosebumps!! I would like details - names, appearances :)

29.05.2013 | 02:20

# 21 Stepan

And ask in the next reading about the Jotuns, Vans, Atlantes, Elvas, Dvergs, I didn’t list them in this order for nothing))).
Thank you!!!

29.05.2013 | 15:43

# 22 Mikhalych

Read HP Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine. 150 years ago, she described all this in sufficient detail. By the way, during the expedition to Tibet, Academician Muldashev saw with what respect for E.P. include brahmins and lamas, they call her the Great Initiate

06.06.2013 | 05:17

# 23 Anna

It turns out that people, all living beings are a kind of antennas for transferring that same solar energy. And the fact that they say that you need to ground yourself more often - is this part of the system of action of this very stream?

14.12.2013 | 12:13

# 24 Kinibaev Kairat

The fact that we are a kind of antennas is true .. But grounding helps to equalize the energy in the body. I myself observed how, after the practices, the bio field and the aura leveled off. Around us there should be a cocoon of energies, but basically the cocoon from below and from above is heterogeneous or it does not exist at all, which contributes to illnesses and all sorts of deviations.

15.12.2013 | 06:09

# 25 Duncan

But it's interesting. When I look at the stars in the evening, I notice luminous paths between them, like rays that connect them. Sometimes they are clearly visible, sometimes not. By the way, where I live, only the brightest stars are visible, i.e. there are not many of them 🙂 Is this how my imagination works or maybe someone else noticed this?

16.12.2013 | 08:05

# 26 Kinibaev Kairat

On Saturday, the film will be released on the site and these rays are described there. Look.

16.12.2013 | 09:59

# 27 Duncan

OK.! I will definitely look

16.12.2013 | 10:46

# 28 Anna

Thanks for the answer)
A little in the wrong context, I thought =)

May I have another question?

I once asked my mother to look at my aura. She did not see the cocoon, she saw colors, a thin shell closer to the body, and the most interesting thing - a foggy crown above her head, as if with moving edges-petals-rays (I don’t know how to describe it more accurately) (could it be one of the chakras?) It came to me in your head to think about your star, in terms of where it is located. I immediately felt the direction and could accurately show it, at that moment a long beam stretched out from this foggy crown in the same direction.
When I reached out to my mother with a feeling of love and affection, she saw a real rainbow spectrum emanating from me in her direction.

What do you think?

17.12.2013 | 14:23

# 29 Serik

“that oil is expensive because it is difficult to produce” I will put in my two cents as a former petroleum engineer.
The cost of production of one barrel of oil:
Saudi Arabia - 2-3 dollars.
Kazakhstan - up to 10-12 dollars ceiling.
Alaska - 20 dollars.
In any case, it was like that 5-6 years ago. + Transportation. After the refinery, profits will be forgiven 2-3 times. If only all associated gas had not been burned. You know how much a barrel costs.

17.12.2013 | 19:42

# 30 Anna

17.12.2013 | 21:57

# 31 Serik

#30 Anna
Didn't understand?

17.12.2013 | 23:38

# 32 Anna

To discuss the topic of the oil refining industry and test your strength in subtle trolling.

18.12.2013 | 11:11

# 33 Kinibaev Kairat

It seems to me that Serik diluted the topic a little and there is nothing wrong with that, and sometimes it is even useful.

18.12.2013 | 11:35

# 34 Serik

#32 Anna
I was replying to a post that was actually written in the month of May.
Trolling here and does not smell. Probably you meant flood. In any case, the “topic” is closed.

19.12.2013 | 00:19

# 35 Anna

clear) I mean both flooding and trolling, the latter turned out to be due to a simple coincidence. Sorry =)

19.12.2013 | 11:45

# 36 Wadlene

Just a little Internet information ....

Anomalous zones, Anomalous zones in Space, Alien bases, Aliens, Space, Moon, Lunar anomalies, UFO, Unknown

Strange things are happening everywhere, not just on the moon.
And a lot of strange things happen on Earth, no less than on the Moon or other space objects. But information about this is carefully hidden. Someone is very greedy...
Strange things are happening on our moon

V. Pravdintsev

The Disappeared Book

In 1977, a book by a certain J. Leonard was published in the UK with a sensational title: "There is someone else on our Moon" and the subtitle: "Amazing facts of intelligent life on the Moon discovered." Who is hiding under the pseudonym J. Leonard? Unknown. In any case, this is a well-informed person who managed to gain access to extensive, including top-secret information.

Thirty-five photographs, each accompanied by a NASA code number, dozens of detailed drawings, according to the author, made from high-quality large-format NASA photographs published in this book, expert statements and an extensive bibliography lead the reader to a stunning conclusion: NASA and many scientists from around the world It has been known for many years that signs of intelligent life have been found on the Moon!

What is this? Disinformation? May be. But then the reaction to the release of the book is striking. No denials, no comments, no discussion of any kind. If the photographs are fake, then the impudence of the author, who in the appendix gives the address of NASA, where you can get copies of them, is surprising. It is possible that NASA itself organized the leak. Here, for example, is the hypothesis of J. Leonard himself: “I'm starting to think that NASA is presenting these photographs with the attitude: “Here they are. If you - the public and the scientific community - are not too interested or blind to see these oddities, this is your problem. We don't have money in the budget for your education. We barely have enough for our own needs.”

In general, there are many strange things in this story. For example, the entire circulation almost immediately disappeared from store shelves. An attempt to distribute the second edition had the same result. Only single copies were accidentally exported abroad, including to the USSR. So almost no one knows about the book. Approximately the same fate has other books on this topic, in particular "Alien bases on the moon" by Fred Steckling. Finding them for sale is almost impossible. The size of the article does not allow dwelling in detail on all the riddles and versions presented by the authors. We will acquaint the reader with only some facts.

Mysterious light on the moon

"Wow! Astronaut Harrison Schmitt, the pilot of the Apollo 17 lunar module, could not contain his surprise, already on the first revolution around the Moon, “I just saw a flash on the lunar surface! The next day, during the fourteenth revolution around the moon, it was the turn to be surprised by another Apollo! 7 pilot, Ronald Evans: “Well! You know I would never believe! I am right above the edge of the Eastern Sea. I just looked down and saw a bright flash with my own eyes!”

When one of the most serious authorities on the physical and geological nature of the Moon, Dr. Farouk El-Baz, consultant and assistant to many American astronauts, was asked to comment on these observations, his answer was quite categorical: “There is no doubt that this is something grandiose: they are not comets, and they are not of natural origin!”

It should be noted that strange light phenomena on the lunar disk have been known for a long time. As early as May 3, 1715, while observing a lunar eclipse in Paris, astronomer E. Louville noticed at the western edge of the Moon “some flashes or instantaneous trembling of light rays ... These light flashes were very short-lived and appeared in one place or another ...” . It could be assumed that meteors were observed against the background of the Moon, burning up in the Earth's atmosphere. However, at the same time as E. Louville, the famous E. Halley observed similar outbreaks in the same region of the Moon in the British Isles. Is it worth explaining that the same meteors burning at a height of several kilometers above the Earth cannot be seen against the background of the same region of the Moon at the same time in London and Paris?

On September 11, 1967, within 8-9 seconds, Canadian scientists recorded a dark rectangular spot with purple edges here, which was clearly visible until it entered the night region. And 13 minutes later, in the direction of the spot, near the crater Sabin, a flash of yellow light appeared. And apparently, it was not by chance that Apollo 11 landed in this zone a year and a half later. The study of the lunar soil at the landing site surprised even the experts. It was melted and, according to Professor T. Gold, with energy 100 times more powerful than the Sun emits. What this source was is unknown. Experts believe that he was at a low altitude above the moon.

In 1968, NASA published a summary of puzzling lunar sightings in its Chronological Catalog of Lunar Event Reports. Among the 579 lunar phenomena were named: moving luminous objects; colored trenches extending at a speed of 6 km/h; giant domes that change their color; a large luminous object, the so-called "Maltese Cross", observed on November 26, 1956; geometric figures; disappearing craters. The Catalog also recorded the speed of movement of the above-mentioned spots in the Sea of Tranquility - from 32 to 80 km / h. One of the most interesting recent observations belongs to a Japanese amateur astronomer. Our television has repeatedly played a video recording of a shadow that he made with a telescope quickly moving across the surface of the moon. If this is not a hoax, then the size of the shadow (about 20 km in diameter) and the enormous speed of its movement (for 2 seconds the shadow traveled about 400 km) allow us to speak of a high technical level of the object.

All these facts forced NASA to purposefully and seriously deal with anomalous phenomena on the Earth's satellite. In 1972, a special program was created, to which dozens of experienced "public" observers armed with telescopes were connected. Each of them has been assigned four lunar regions by NASA, where lunar phenomena have been repeatedly observed in the past. Numerous symposiums and articles have been devoted to these oddities. Attempts to explain these anomalous phenomena by flashes in the eyes of astronauts, which occur when cosmic particles hit the eyeball, did not stand up to criticism. Firstly, the astronauts themselves will never confuse them with point flashes on the surface of the planet, because cosmic rays cause a very characteristic picture in the human eye.

Secondly, light phenomena on the Moon are observed not only by astronauts, but also by earthly researchers who are not subject to such a "space bombardment". And, thirdly, flares from cosmic particles are described by astronauts and astronauts as instantaneous. On the Moon, on the other hand, long-term, even hours-long, glows or periodic flickering in the same place were repeatedly observed. Some people believe that lunar flares are the result of meteorite impacts on rocks and rock. However, this can explain only random short-term and one-time effects, but not long-term glows over vast areas.

The meteorite hypothesis is also contradicted by other facts. In particular, simultaneous surveillance in the United States and South Africa some "comet-shaped object" passing through the lunar disk on September 27, 1881. The distance between observation points was about 12,000 km. And one more interesting fact, described by the famous planetary explorer I.I. Schroeter in his book "Fragments of the Lunar Topography for a More Accurate Knowledge of the Lunar Surface" (1791). He says that he observed a flash in the center of the Moon, consisting of many single small sparks and rapidly moving in a straight line to the north. “When this rain of light had gone half way, a similar flash of light appeared in the south over exactly the same place… The second flash was exactly the same as the first, it consisted of similar small sparks that flashed away in the same direction to the north…” It is rather difficult to explain such a unique phenomenon by the fall of meteorites.

The “gas” hypothesis seems to be the most reasoned. It has been suggested that during the formation of the Moon, gases could have got under the lava flows that had not yet cooled down, and now they are gradually released. But spontaneously released gases, as a rule, have neither color, nor rhythm, nor, moreover, shape and size. And on the Moon, there are various colors, and rhythmic flickering, and a clear configuration. It is not clear why gases glow spontaneously. It is unlikely that the reason is the impact on the gases of the ultraviolet rays of the Sun. After all, short-term flashes and long-term glows are also observed when the Sun does not illuminate the lunar surface at all.

It has been hypothesized that the Earth's magnetic tail accelerates solar particles that bombard the Moon, causing flares and luminescence. But in this case, glows and flashes would be observed in random places, and would not be tied for decades and centuries to 90 specific areas on the Moon. And can, for example, the bright “brilliant radiance” noted in 1948 be compared with simple luminescence? ..

Other civilizations on the moon?

For example, strange objects resembling some kind of mechanisms. The purpose of some devices can be guessed from the changes in the lunar surface that they leave. For example, the edges of some craters are destroyed by something that moves along them in a spiral (this is reminiscent of our giant open pit mines). Many craters, especially on the far side of the Moon, have a pronounced polygonal shape, which has not yet been explained. During the flight around the moon of Apollo 14, the astronauts took a very interesting photo. This is a clear image of a giant mechanical device, later called the "superdevice-1971". Two light and openwork (metal?) structures stand inside one of the craters. And without casting any shadow. From their base stretch long cords. According to rough estimates, the size of the device is 1-1.5 miles (1.6-2.4 km).

Striking results are obtained by comparing three photographs of the same area taken from Apollo 16 during 50 revolutions around the moon. On the inner slope of the crater, an X-device was recorded in an early image. After 2 days, an active spraying process was recorded in the same place. One can only speculate what these mechanisms are used for: the search for raw materials, construction work, the elimination of defects in the lunar crust, archaeological tasks, the extraction of gas to create an artificial atmosphere? ..

Experts have calculated that almost a ton of oxygen can be obtained from 2.5 tons of rock using the reduction process. This reserve is enough for an earthling for 3 years! “Is that why THEY are destroying mountain ranges?” asks J. Leonard.

By the way, similar self-propelled boulders with a clear trail were also registered on Earth, in particular in Death Valley (California).

Who gave us the moon?

Let's add one more curious detail to this. Back in the early 60s, astronomer Carl Sagan reported that huge caves had been discovered under the lunar surface with special instruments, the conditions in which could be favorable for life. The volume of some of them reaches 100 cubic meters. km. The director of the Main Observatory of the USSR in Pulkovo, Alexander Deutsch, expressed the same hypothesis at that time.

The expeditions of the American Apollos made the hypothesis of huge voids inside the Earth's natural satellite even more substantiated. In July 1969, during the first landing on the moon, astronauts N. Armstrong and E. Aldrin installed a seismograph on its surface. After returning to the main ship, the already unnecessary lander was dropped onto the lunar surface. It was expected that the vibrations of deep rocks caused by the impact would be recorded and transmitted to the Earth by a seismograph within a few seconds. But an amazing thing happened: the device recorded fluctuations for several ... hours!

Calculations have shown that this is possible only if there are huge cavities at a depth of 30-40 km - they resonate. Exactly the same results were obtained during the next five landings on the moon. Similar considerations about hollowness were expressed at one time about Phobos, whose trajectory and speed of movement are inexplicable by natural causes. At one time, Corresponding Member of the USSR Academy of Sciences I. Shklovsky put forward a version: anomalies in the trajectory of Phobos can be explained by only one circumstance - this is an artificial, (man-made) object.

Other scientists have put forward the hypothesis that Phobos - former asteroid, which some space civilizations installed in Mars orbit, where it is used as a logistics station. And that Phobos is hollow inside, because for many years its resources, rich in chemical elements, have been being developed.

But somehow, attention to this hypothesis gradually faded and flared up again only in January 1989, when this satellite of Mars was reached by the Soviet space probe Phobos-2. On board the station there was a very powerful laser installation, which, from a height of 50 m, was supposed to direct a beam to the surface of the satellite in order to analyze the gases that arose under its influence. However, something (or someone?) got in the way of this experiment. At the very beginning, a camera on board the device recorded a strange object, apparently of artificial origin, about 25 km long, which was approaching the probe. On Earth, they managed to get several pictures (they were even shown on all-Union television) depicting this “something” that looked like a giant UFO, after which the connection suddenly disappeared and was no longer resumed.

It is now known that all the flights of Gemini (1965-1966) and Apollo (1968-1975) were controlled from a distance and close by mysterious flying objects. And how, in connection with the flight of "Phobos-2", not to recall the mysterious incident that occurred on the American spacecraft "Apollo-13". Here is how Maurice Chatelain, a former NASA space radio officer, describes the situation then:

“Apollo 13, which, as you know, failed to land on the Moon, carried a small nuclear charge on board to create an artificial moonquake so that, as a result of the explosion, to observe the infrastructure of the Moon with seismographs (telemetrically from Earth). A mysterious explosion occurred on this ship, destroying one of the oxygen tanks in the cockpit. It is not known for sure whether this was done by the “plate” that was watching the ship. This explosion was intended to prevent an experiment with a nuclear weapon that could destroy the bases. extraterrestrial civilizations on the moon…"

There is a hypothesis that the Moon is a giant spaceship that crashed and was forced to “park” to the Earth in ancient times for a “major overhaul”. After all, natural space bodies with their multi-kilometer protective shell, some scientists believe, are the safest and most reliable vehicles for interplanetary travel.

This version, unlike others, explains many lunar phenomena. And unusually flat, like a frying pan, the bottom of most multi-kilometer craters (It seems that under the relatively thin "soft" outer shell there is an extremely strong sphere). And the details of some gigantic structures on the surface and in the cracks of the Moon, and fragments of cyclopean mechanisms, and much more. For example, the possibility of "repairing" the Moon by a kind of "stitching" of the cracked surface. Traces of such "stitching" are clearly visible, in particular, in the area of the craters Bullialdus and Lubinitsky.

The same hypothesis answers such a “tricky” question, which was raised in one of the publications: “What prevented a highly developed civilization, which, obviously, had already overcome huge interstellar distances, to overcome some 385 thousand km more and settle on the heavenly planet Earth?” But after all, the "paradise" Earth is for us. And what is it like in a strange, maybe even life-threatening, earthly atmosphere for aliens? And why leave the lunar “houses”, laboratories, factories inhabited by many generations? ..

And in conclusion, I would like to cite the amazing words of Neil Armstrong. And although he later refused them, his negotiations were heard by many American radio amateurs.

Armstrong: What is this? What the hell is the matter? I would like to know the truth, what is it?

NASA: What's going on? Is something wrong?

Armstrong: "There are big objects here, sir! Huge! Oh my God! There are other spaceships here! They are on the other side of the crater! They are on the moon and watching us!”

29.01.2014 | 15:06

# 37 sergey lobachev

Some kind of crumpled infa……… One piled on top of the other…… Well, first of all, there is a missing book in the net (and it really smells of Order)……. work, elimination of defects in the lunar crust, archaeological tasks, extraction of gas to create an artificial atmosphere? ..))……….What kind of crap……….What did Osho say there?……..Incomparable facts are trying to conjecture with our logic (so approximately)……..If there is something on the Moon (something is happening), then it looks absolutely different from what We understand……….Excavators, oxygen reserves in tons of rock……Hmm……morasm……… ..If there is something, it is clearly not a protein Life, it is a manifestation of Energies……..So approximately…..

31.01.2014 | 06:39

# 38 Omhare

Kairat has a reading about the Moon, I found answers there, they suit me ... everything, as I suspected, coincided); ... in general ... all sorts of energies are naughty there, earthlings have nothing to fear); live in peace.) The people who read the mystic Gurdjieff? I didn’t read it, but he has it about the Moon, and he was terribly afraid of it, if anyone who read it can comment, I suggest “sharing” a compressed version))) since you can’t read everything! As they say: ars longa vita brevis!

31.01.2014 | 13:57

# 39 Wadlene

# 37 sergey lobachev
Sergey, everything should be taken as INFORMATION, not facts ... and in order to write that this is “crap”, “morasm”, for this you need to “walk” there at least several times 🙂 ...
Personally, I haven’t seen mechanisms on the Moon, but there are buildings-buildings (different from architecture on Earth) and several floors with luminous windows (if you can call it that), and everything is on the physical level and they are protected on the 3rd and 4th m (ethereal-astral) level with energy barriers that cause a feeling of strong danger and even the inability to overcome them by consciousness!
It is necessary to treat any information in a completely different way, perceive it simply as information and analyze it according to YOUR KNOWLEDGE! Kairat, Wadlene!!