Evgeny Ponasenkov: biography, personal life, family, photo. Biography and personal life of Evgeny Ponasenkov Who is Evgeny Nikolaevich
Ponasenkov Evgeny Nikolaevich is one of the most famous public, literary, in the Russian Federation.
early years
Evgeny Panasenkov was born in the capital Soviet Union in 1982. As a child, he could gather around the children and start telling them something. Already at this age, it became clear that he had certain inclinations
Zhenya was developed beyond his years and, as he himself claims, already at school he wrote one of his first historical works. Yevgeny Panasenkov owes his love for history to his father. The young man grew up and was brought up in a decent and educated family. His mother worked as an engineer, and his father worked as a military doctor.
His parents noticed that they were not sent to study in general education school, but in the one where he could study in depth in English. The guy graduated from school in 1999 and immediately entered Moscow State University. He studied at the Faculty of History and most of all paid attention to the personality of Napoleon, as well as his military campaigns. Panasenkov made presentations at various conferences more than once. These conferences were always exciting, because the student knew how to intrigue people.
Actually very Yevgeny Ponasenkov. Photos from his scientific conferences show a real person passionate about science. The talented young man did not want to receive a diploma that the university was completed. He completed his studies in 2004.
historical activity
As a historian, Yevgeny Ponasenkov managed to achieve considerable heights, and this despite his age. Participation in conferences on Napoleon's wars did not go unnoticed. After graduating from Moscow State University, he published a book called The Truth About the War of 1812. This book was interestingly written, but received a lot of negative reviews. The fact is that the author did not praise the Russian army, as they always do, but looked at events from a different angle. Eugene wrote that not only France, but also Russia was to blame for this war. He also mentioned that the political and military leadership of the country of that time proved to be mediocre. The book became very popular and helped Panasenkov become a prominent figure in history.
In the summer of 2014, he read out a report where he describes the model for reforming Europe, which was proposed by Napoleon and Alexander I. He also spoke about how Russia's foreign policy relations developed during the reign of Alexander I. The work again received both opponents and adherents. The thing is that the historian never praised Russia in his works, but tried to look at what was happening as an independent figure.
Reviews of historical works
As mentioned above, not everyone shared Panasenkov's views. For example, Agronov said that the work of a young historical figure is aimed at rewriting history, as well as sowing anti-patriotic sentiments in society. He also believed that Eugene was biased in assessing the history of Russia in his works.
Solidarity with Agronov was another historical figure - by the name of Ivchenko. He accused Panasenkov of a lack of professionalism and a banal rewriting of history.
There were those who took the side of the young author. These include Irina Gennadievna Dagrysheva. In her dissertation, she supported everything that was written in The Truth about the War of 1812, and added that Napoleon really did everything in order to avoid a bloody war, but Russia's policy towards France forced him to start hostilities.
Literary activity
Evgeny Panasenkov wrote not so many books, however, this fact takes place in his biography. It is worth noting that he is the author of a huge number scientific works, which were published not only in Russian.
The first book is the famous "The Truth About the War of 1812". The second book was written in 2007 and was called "Tango Alone".
On the this moment Eugene no longer wrote books. Do not forget that he is only thirty-three years old, which means that he will be able to write many more interesting works.
Activities on television
As a student of the Moscow state university, Evgeny Panasenkov begins to work on television. It first appeared on television in 2003. He was the leading column in the weekly Kommersant-Vlast.
In 2006, he became a member of another project and now writes his own column in the Queer magazine. He published a wide variety of articles on many different topics.
In 2012, when all of Russia was celebrating the centenary of the victory in the war over Napoleon, Evgeny appeared on the Dozhd channel, where he once again confirmed that this war was more far-fetched, and denied that it was worth celebrating this date. On the same channel, he participated in many programs that discussed the domestic and foreign policy of the Russian Federation.
In 2013, Panasenkov became the host of the program, in which he regularly reviews the latest in world cinema.
Six months later, he hosts another program called "Dramaturgy of History." It is worth noting that he was not only the host, but also one of the authors.
In the spring of 2015, Panasenkov first appeared on the radio, where he entered into a discussion with one of the deputies.
cultural activities
Yevgeny Panasenkov created the theater, which was called "The Secret".
In 2008, he had the honor of leading the Russian delegation. All this happened during the Olympic Games.
A year later, he wrote the script and directed the performance, which took place in honor of the anniversary of Elena Obraztsova.
In 2011, Evgeny Ponasenkov became the host of a program in which he talks about life prominent people. The focus is usually on those people who have made a huge contribution to world history.
In the fall of 2012, the film Eugene is released. The painting was called "Mysteries of the Gulf of Naples." Filming took place in Italy. It was the debut work in the cinema, which was taken up by Evgeny Panasenkov. The director made the picture interesting and exciting, for which he received recognition in the world of cinema.
Participation in performances and films
In 2010, he starred in a film called "Back to the USSR." Plays the role of a psychologist, whose name is Alexander.
In 2011, Panasenkov took part in several projects at once. The first was the film "Boris Godunov", where he got the role of the Polish prince.
Evgeny Ponasenkov starred in the series "Web-5". He played the role of the director, whose name is Maxim.
His last work in 2011 was the role in the long-awaited film Shadow Fight: The Last Round. Eugene played a small role as a TV program director.
The next work in the cinema had to wait almost three years, and only in 2014 Panasenkov starred in the film "Along the Razor's Edge". Plays the role of one of the officers of the German army named Heinz.
Evgeny Panasenkov: biography, family
Not much information is available about what Eugene is like in life, outside of television screens. This is due to the fact that the young man is completely focused on his career. As he noted more than once in interviews, you must first make a successful career, and then think about something else. This is exactly what Evgeny Ponasenkov thinks, whose personal life does not indulge in an abundance of information.
If you look closely at the biography of this person, you will notice that after graduation, he annually became a participant in any projects or worked on something of his own.
The young man is a native Muscovite. After all, his parents were born in the glorious city of Moscow, where Evgeny Panasenkov now lives. Biography, personal life - all this regularly becomes the subject of interest of journalists. And about the last information is not as much as we would like.
The family occupies an important place in a man's life. He has repeatedly stated that it was his parents who made him who he is at the moment. It was they, as well as their instructions, who formed in him those views that many historical and cultural figures of Russia today reckon with.
Results. Brief description of personality
Today, the historian, actor and director is extremely popular. It is difficult to find a person who does not know who Evgeny Ponasenkov is. Despite the fact that his views often contradict public opinion, he is respected and revered as a very talented person.
Eugene was one of the first who was not afraid to speak out in a way that is not customary. Despite his age, he managed to achieve a lot. He is known as a person who always has his own view on any situation. He became exactly the one who was not afraid to speak out against public opinion, and this can be seen in the book The Truth About the War of 1812.
In the book "Tango in Solitude", Evgeny Ponasenkov made it clear that he really sometimes had a hard time. His personal life is a prime example of this. After all, many simply turn away from him because of his views.
Despite everything, he managed to succeed. If Eugene continues in the same spirit, then, without a doubt, he will be able to become one of the most famous figures in the world of cinema, history and in many other areas.
Ponasenkov is the idol of many young scientists. They strive to achieve at least part of what Yevgeny Konstantinovich managed to do. This man will certainly go down in history.
I understand that the names of Ponasenkov and Sokolov do not mean anything to the majority of the public. Therefore, I will begin by telling you a little about both gentlemen, whose conflict is now shaking near-historical publics and conferences.
Oleg Sokolov is a professional historian who has been dealing with Napoleonic studies for a long time, a lot and seriously. Suffice it to say that he has 7 monographs and a bunch of articles on his account, from which it is quite possible to read, for example, "The Battle of Two Empires". In addition, he is also a person who is fond of reconstruction. And addicted a lot and seriously. For example, he directs the reconstruction of the Battle of Borodino. In general, the person in the subject.
Yevgeny Ponasenkov is a young historical revisionist who actively exploits the image of a narcissist (he can easily call himself a "historian-sun", which is especially pleasing). He studied at Moscow State University at the Faculty of History, but did not finish it, as he himself says, because evil people appointed protection for one day with his concert (already ridiculous). Recently he published the book "The First Scientific History of the War of 1812", because of which, in fact, all the fuss flared up.
Briefly about the "First scientific history... ”, then in it Ponasenkov decided (in fact, he had actively tried to do this before) to win the laurels of Viktor Suvorov in a new field. Since Stalin started the Second world war already written earlier, he decided to write about the fact that Alexander I unleashed the Patriotic War, and then only General Moroz saved him. The book itself is thick, large, in fact it is a combination of a compilation of previously written books + a description of how cool and beautiful the author is + very controversial and ambiguous conclusions.
According to this opus, a company of Klim Zhukov and Oleg Sokolov recorded a video in which they rode through the scientific nature of the “First scientific ...” work. The entry appeared on the Goblin's channel in "Intelligence". In principle, the guys are right, because it’s a little ridiculous to blame the fact that a 40-year-old man plagiarized some ideas from a 17-year-old youth (at the time Sokolov’s books were published) - a little ridiculous. Well, many more different words were said there, which makes no sense to repeat, here is the video. True, he is big.
After the release of the video, Ponasenkov was bombed, although, by and large, Zhukov and Sokolov gave him free advertising. After all, everyone knows how we love Suvorov, Fomenko, Nosovsky, Burovsky and other similar authors. Could and enjoy additional advertising. But the narcissist did not miss such an opportunity for hype and wrote down his answer to Chamberlain.
Then a scandal was arranged at Sokolov's public lecture, after which he recorded his next answer on the same Goblin channel.
This time Ponasenkov delivered two opuses at once:
First for an hour:
Then three more:
Moreover, all the revelations are at least "grand" - Narcissists, probably, simply do not have others. They only have blockbusters and big events...
So far, there have been no replies. The fact remains that those who support Ponasenkov are trying to cut Sokolov's latest video from YouTube, but the other side, more adequate in the dispute, does not suffer from such garbage, especially since the video has already spread all over the Internet.
Well, it pleases, of course, that Ponasenkov has all the comments that ask uncomfortable questions or explain why the author - let's put it mildly, is not a historian, but the people who left them are banned. But under the videos of Sokolov-Zhukov there is no such mess. Although, I must say that sometimes Sokolov’s behavior is also annoying, but in this case, he, despite his shortcomings, looks more correct and certainly more honest. Yes, he knows history better.
Well, in general, it all looks, in my opinion, something like this. Smart people took the time to parse a highly promoted and peddled book to warn people not to pollute their brains. Now they will have to fight back a lot and stubbornly from the chic troll, who only needed this.
It's a pity. During this time, Sokolov was able to record many interesting lectures. Well, Ponasenkov got such a great opportunity to show off that he actually needed it.
Well, actually, all the videos are posted in the post. They are long, but it’s worth getting acquainted, this is perhaps even cleaner than many TV shows ...
In a biographical sketch under the modest title "Renaissance Man", a detailed description of all extraordinary virtues follows: "director, singer (dramatic tenor), actor, TV presenter, producer, historian, political scientist, poet, writer and public figure, stage director three musical, six drama performances, as well as many poetic and musical performances, "Person of the Year - 2003" by the Biographical Society of the US Congress and a nominee from the International Biographical Center (Cambridge) (also included in the directory "2000 Outstanding Intellectuals of the 21st Century").
His biography has been published in encyclopedias "Who is who: Russian edition» (reprinted since 2003). The main epithets used in the press: "Renaissance Man" , "Last Romantic" , "brilliant rebel" , "esthete from the theater" , "just a genius" (magazine "Spark"), "conceptual truth lover" etc. etc. And the last thing - he is also an academician in addition to all this! Mr. Ponasenkov wrote, and, indeed, quite a lot. As he himself assures, more than two hundred and seventy "scientific articles". But paper, as you know, endures everything.
If you cast at least a cursory glance at the photographs of Yevgeny Ponasenkov, who is now popular in narrow liberal circles (on the picture) , abundantly scattered on the Internet, the resemblance to the famous "Turkish subject" immediately catches the eye. The same loose-fitting jacket in the smallest kaleidoscopic check, a bow tie, as on the actor Yursky, who brilliantly played Bender, white pants - even right now to the blessed Rio de Janeiro!
No, really, the familiar captain's cap. But on the other hand, Mr. Ponasenkov's well-fed physiognomy always has the most pleasant expression. It seems that he will just open his mouth, so he will immediately begin to broadcast about four hundred relatively fair ways taking money from citizens. But no, in public he speaks exclusively about history, recites poetry and even sings.
However, if you look into the biography of this "conceptual truth-seeker" without the calf's delight of his liberal admirers, and without paying attention to the exceptionally truthful expression of his face, then it will immediately turn out that this "historian", although he studied at the Faculty of History of Moscow State University, but he did not graduated and diploma higher education does not have at all. As he has neither candidate nor doctoral dissertations. The same applies to the title of "academician". He, of course, is a member, but not at all of the Russian Academy of Sciences, but of a certain Russian Academy of Sciences and Arts (RuAN), which, as you know, anyone can join, it is enough to pay a membership fee. Hundreds of such "academies" sprang up in Russia after the collapse of the USSR and the "democratic reforms" initiated by the liberals.
Speaking about his family, Ponasenkov proudly declares that on the maternal side he is from hereditary aristocrats who owned a house in St. Petersburg, as well as a palace and a stud farm in the Crimea. Significantly adding at the same time that he himself likes to recall Napoleon’s phrase “my family tree begins with the 18th Brumaire”, and “does not attach of great importance pedigree interrupted by the catastrophe of 1917.
Quite in the style of Ostap, the site also describes other advantages of the owner of a beautiful jacket and bow tie in order to completely impress the inexperienced reader (we quote verbatim):
“... from psychological stress during the play “The German Saga” staged by Ponasenkov (by the way, created based on Yukio Mishima’s play “My Friend Hitler”); two spectators at different ends of the hall fell unconscious.
.
“... Once, passing by the famous Fountain of Friendship of Peoples at VDNKh, Eugene called it “The Fountain of Friendship of Freaks”, after which the rumor quickly picked up this apt remark ...”
In a word, he is both a "historian", and an "academician", and a creator of folklore, and a poet, and a "singer" and a player on the pipe.
Mr. Ponasenkov also has a peculiar sense of humor. So, at his anniversary evening (despite his youth, he is already celebrating anniversaries), Ponasenkov said that once, when his relative was called from the military enlistment office to congratulate him on Victory Day, he stated that his grandfather fought on the side of the Nazis, which led those who called to stupor. After that, Ponasenkov laughingly said that this was how he checked the employees of the military registration and enlistment office "for a sense of humor." Later, however, he explained this by the fact that, in his opinion, there was "no difference" between the Hitlerite dictatorship and the state system in the USSR.
The Strange "Truth" About the War of 1812
The scandal was already caused by the first "scientific work" of Ponasenkov - the monograph "The Truth about the War of 1812". In this opus, Ostap from history laid the blame for unleashing the conflict on the Russian side and accused the Russian command of mediocrity, including Emperor Alexander I and Field Marshal Kutuzov.
In Ponasenkov's opinion, Russia itself was to blame for the fact that it was invaded by the innumerable hordes of Napoleon, who allegedly opposed the war in every possible way, allegedly did everything possible to avoid it and generally carried out "progressive reforms."
Such is the “original” point of view of our Bender from history to the Patriotic War of the Russian people, who heroically repelled an unprecedented foreign invasion. But doesn't it seem to you that it looks suspiciously strongly reminiscent of something? Yes, yes, that's exactly what Goebbels said, justifying Hitler's attack on the USSR! Like, it was Moscow that allegedly threatened Germany, and the Fuhrer had no choice but to go to the "liberation" of the Russian people from Stalin and the Bolsheviks.
Of course, the appearance of this kind of "historical" book immediately caused a storm of indignant responses in Russia. Here are just a few comments that appeared on the Internet:
“Russian history has been blotted out and distorted many times, both by venerable historians and amateur historians (fictionists from history), one of these amateurs appears before us with his opus, which is proudly called a monograph, that is, the scientific work “The Truth about the War of 1812”. This, as you may have guessed, is Evgeny Nikolaevich Ponasenkov ... It also seems to me that the author does not interfere with being more delicate “to find fault with Russians in Russia” ... The book is essentially empty ... for historical science it has no value, since it does not contain anything new, hitherto unknown. In the development of the book by the author of the book, written materials of the described era were not used, eyewitnesses of the events are poorly represented, the expert material to which the author refers is the material of specialists in the main present time and, as they say, second-hand authors, that is, the book “the author about the authors” .
And another comment: “I just can’t understand why E.N. Kutuzov didn’t please him so much. Ponasenkov in his work, he repeats all historical anecdotes and insinuations. Judging Kutuzov is ridiculous, history has already judged everything, and the rest is just words. To cite in your book the stupidest statements of Count A.F. Langeron, fabrications about the military unsuitability of Kutuzov by Count L. L. Bennigsen, who, for 43 years of acquaintance, could not understand the person next to him, or did not want to understand Kutuzov. This can be objected to with the words spoken to Bennigsen by Kutuzov himself: “We will never, my dear, disagree with you; you think only of the benefit of England, but for me, if this island goes to the bottom of the sea today, I will not gasp. .
Authoritative historians also gave their assessment of the opus. Yes, the candidate historical sciences, chief curator of the museum-panorama "Battle of Borodino" Lydia Ivchenko believes that “lack of professionalism, in our opinion, is most clearly manifested in cases where a historian or one who considers himself a historian is convinced that he himself is outside of ideology, protected from its harmful influence by “elementary common sense” .
Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Deputy Head of the Department of History of the Military University of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation Igor Shein in a review of the post-Soviet historiography of the war of 1812, Ponasenkov is ranked among "Ultra-radical wing", claiming to be sensational.
Lev Agronov in his dissertation "Post-Soviet Russian historiography Patriotic War 1812" notes that “in 2001, at the intersection of historiography and journalism in Russia, a fundamentally new phenomenon arose, which we define as historical journalism about the war of 1812 with an emphatically “anti-patriotic” orientation, caused in many respects by the modern desire for a total rewriting of history with extremely negative assessments of all aspects of Russian reality" .
Got it for Suvorov
The Russian military genius Suvorov also got nuts from Ponasenkov. In his writings, Bender claims from history that Suvorov is “not a military genius,” and so on.
Sergey Gorsky, outraged by the writings of this "historian", made a large selection of his slanderous statements on the Internet, caustically commenting on all the absurdities that Ponasenkov piles up about the great Russian commander.
Ponasenkov about Suvorov: Painfully, clinically eccentric" …
A comment: “In the book of Robert Wilson, an English agent in the Russian army in 1812, it says: “Even Suvorov's eccentric manners testified to the superiority of his mind. They harmed him in the eyes of superficial observers, but he contemptuously "ignored the grins of people who were less enlightened, and stubbornly walked along the road that wisdom had destined for him to achieve a lofty patriotic goal" .
Remembers a retired sergeant Ivan Sergeev, who was with Suvorov for sixteen years without a break: “The imaginary foolishness of Suvorov had a great purpose and deep significance. The main deviation from the ordinary life of others was his habit of getting up at midnight and walking around naked for several hours. Other oddities were the consequences of these first ones. It is no longer surprising that a person who got up at 12 o'clock at night had dinner at 8 o'clock in the morning.
Whoever wanted to accustom himself and his warriors to be always ready to repulse enemies, to walk at night through forests and fields in order to find himself over the head of enemies, he had to not know ordinary sleep and rest; that was the main reason for the cessation of order in his life. But he woke up his army before dawn, and his quick transitions at night gave rise to folk tale about Suvorov, the invisible man.
His simplicity, restraint, patience, alien to any bliss, made him akin to the soldiers who loved him like a father. He taught them by example to endure all the difficulties of life. Loving simplicity, Suvorov sometimes showed himself in all his splendor, in all his stars and orders, but this was on the solemn Tsar's days, in the holy Church, where he bowed his gray forehead to the ground and sang spiritual songs for the sexton. Such an example of piety kindled faith in the hearts of the warriors. They considered him invincible, and were invincible with Suvorov" .
Ponasenkov: “He lost the Swiss campaign, and not to Bonaparte, but to his Marshal Massena” .
A comment: “This unsuccessful campaign,” wrote D. Milyutin, “brought the Russian army more honor than the most brilliant victory.” Clausewitz called the exit from the encirclement a "miracle". Engels believed that this transition "was the most outstanding of all the Alpine transitions made up to that time" .
Suvorov not only received the title of Generalissimo from Emperor Paul for this campaign, but the glory of these battles remained for centuries. And this is remembered not only by grateful (unlike E. Ponasenkov) descendants, but also by the Swiss, who carefully guard everything connected with the name of Suvorov.
Nuns lead "Suvorov excursions", book dealers open museums, and politicians restore monumental houses with their own money. Himself massena said afterwards: "I would give all my 48 campaigns for 17 days of Suvorov's Swiss campaign" .
Ponasenkov: Suvorov "did not spare the soldier, unlike the Westerners" .
// Proceedings of the scientific conference of students and graduate students: Lomonosov - 2001. M.: Publishing House of Moscow State University, 2001. C. 209-212.
- Ponasenkov E. N. Not everything is a carnival for a cat // Motherland. 2003. No. 10. p. twenty.
- Ponasenkov E. N.“Our army is commanded by the most mediocre leader” // Kommersant-Vlast. 2003. No. 34 (537). C. 60-64.
- Ponasenkov E. N. Inoculation against democracy // Kommersant-Vlast. 2003. No. 13 (516). C. 28-29.
- Ponasenkov E. N. Russia is ordinary fascism // Kommersant-Vlast. 2003. No. 46 (546). C. 40-45.
- Ponasenkov E. N. Once more about masochism // Kommersant-Vlast. 2004. No. 36. C. 61-63.
- Ponasenkov E. N. Russian pensioners: they fought for Napoleon // Kommersant-Vlast. 2005. No. 6 (609). C. 72.
- Ponasenkov E. N. Poetry does not equal rhyme, and art does not equal everyday life. // "Reiter. Military history magazine. No. 17, 2005, p. 222-223.
- Ponasenkov E. N.
