In battle, all means are good, who said. To achieve the goal, all means are good. See what "The end justifies the means" is in other dictionaries
War, without a doubt, is one of the most terrible trials that can befall a person. Nothing brings so much misfortune, so much sorrow and suffering, as their wars bring. From petty tribal skirmishes to the cataclysmic conflicts of the 20th century, they have haunted humanity throughout history. In addition to the enormous risk to life, war is also the hardest test of the human psyche. To remain a man at the front, when comrades are dying around him every day, or in the rear, when you constantly live in fear for your loved ones, afraid to receive a fatal letter from the front - only a truly strong-willed person can withstand this. I believe that the consequentialist principle "all means are fair in war" is a fundamentally wrong view of the world, especially in the conditions of real military operations.
Talking about the war, it is hard not to recall one of the greatest works of Russian and world literature - "War and Peace" by L.
Our experts can check your essay according to the USE criteria
Site experts Kritika24.ru
Teachers of leading schools and current experts of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation.
N. Tolstoy. Tolstoy's ideas of non-violence made a huge contribution to Russian philosophy, and were also reflected in the characters of many of the heroes of this work. The highest manifestation of moral qualities and philanthropy is the episode in which Natasha Rostova, a man with extremely wealthy inner world, in tears, persuades his parents to give all the carts that were at the disposal of the Rostov family to the wounded soldiers, who otherwise would have faced inevitable death in French captivity. In this scene, the goal is to evacuate Moscow at the lowest possible cost, but to achieve this goal, the Rostovs would have to refuse help to the soldiers. This did not happen only thanks to Natasha, who was able to convince the whole family and dispose of the carts fairly.
We meet another episode, incredibly difficult for both the reader and the characters, in the epic novel Quiet Flows the Don by Mikhail Sholokhov. Here, the heroes face an even more difficult test - a civil, "fratricidal" war. Ilya Bunchuk is an example of a person who is ready to do anything for the sake of the party and the "fight against the bourgeois system." He is engaged in agitation at the front, preparing militias in the rear, making every effort to suppress the white movement. However, even he is unable to withstand the work of the commandant of the revolutionary tribunal. After a week of constant executions of the White Guards, Bunchuk's psyche was finally shaken. He suddenly realized what terrible sin committed, "bringing the revolution to the masses." The death of his beloved finally breaks him: death for him becomes a happy occasion, deliverance from suffering.
Thus, on the example of two different works, we were convinced that, in spite of any circumstances, the most important thing is to maintain basic moral guidelines and not turn from a man into a beast. I would like to finish with a quote from a textbook on philosophy: “A person who violates fundamental moral principles undoubtedly acts against himself, since he destroys his psyche due to the constant conflict of consciousness and subconsciousness. He cannot avoid this conflict, even if he convinces himself that he does not care about high morality.
Updated: 2017-09-25
Attention!
Thank you for your attention.
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and press Ctrl+Enter.
Thus, you will provide invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.
It seems to me, friends, that everything we have already seen performed by Real Madrid and Barcelona in the spring of 2011 was nothing more than a warm-up before the main battles of the year for them. From a draw in the championship, no one felt cold or hot.
Champions League. 1/2 finals. The first match
Referee: Wolfgang Stark (Ergolding, Germany).
Bookmaker quotes: 2.64 – 3.40 – 2.80.
The victory of Madrid in the Cup, of course, amused the vanity of the capital, but nothing more. Cup he is a cup - to him, not only in Spain, the attitude is condescendingly cool.
Whether it's the Champions League. This is where genuine passions and significant fees are. That's where the prestige is! It's probably even good that at first they warmed up at home - now they are guaranteed to "light up" in Europe. There was simply no point in hiding something from each other and normalizing the load. Everything went by the wayside - even the ending. The third round of Clasico is on the agenda. The climax is near...
The coaches of the teams, long-time acquaintances in cooperation with Barça of the last century, were already strong enough not to say nonsense to each other before the last games, but before today's meeting they still could not restrain themselves. And in absentia they exchanged barbs.
Mourinho, in particular, said that his young Catalan colleague is the only specialist of his kind who scolds the judges for the right decisions and caustically reminded the guest how his team overcame Chelsea at one time, and this year - Arsenal. The hint is clear. In both cases, according to the English fans, there were effective referee errors in favor of the Blaugrand. In Barcelona, of course, there is a different opinion on this matter. However, Jose is not interested in it.
Guardiola also did not get into his pocket for a word. “In this room, he’s the damn boss, the damn master,” the guest coach irritably threw in the press center of the Santiago Bernabeu stadium. And I'm not going to compete with him in this. But as soon as he allows himself to address me familiarly, well, then I will do the same.
Cristiano Ronaldo and Marcelo are preparing for the battle with Barcelona
It was evident from the excited state of the Catalan that Mourinho's remarks had achieved their goal. Perhaps this is what the cunning Jose wanted - to sow nervousness in the enemy camp. We already know: in war, all means are good ...
Although, to be honest, I doubt that Barça's leaders can be pissed off with such things - tea, not the first time in Clasico. Much more guests are concerned about personnel problems. Here they are just at the "Blaugran" are really big. Guardiola must have already forgotten those blessed times when he had no problems in defense. Now they are chasing him literally on the heels. Didn't have time to recover Carles Puyol how a tumor in the liver was found in Erica Abidal. Recovered long-suffering Gabriel Milito- broke Adriano. Remains out of the game Maxwell. And this means that in Madrid the Barca coach will again have to sculpt the defense “from what was.” He doesn't have much. Puyol is likely to move to the left, and his place in the center will be taken by a nominal defensive midfielder Javier Mascherano.
Guardiola is even more worried about injury Iniesta. Damage to the calf muscle, apparently, will not allow Andres to go to the Bernabeu lawn. Consequently, Pep will also have to rebuild the attack group. This is already more serious.
Mourinho also has losses - moreover, approximately equivalent to the Catalan ones. Disqualification left stopper out of work Ricardo Carvalho, injury - central midfielder Sami Khediru. But Jose, unlike the enemy, has a significant replenishment. The championship game with Valencia, in fact, was “made” by two people - Kaka and Gonzalo Higuain. The Brazilian scored four points in the "goal + pass" system, the Argentine - five! And this extravaganza ended with a score of 6:3 in favor of Real Madrid. Meanwhile, neither one nor the other has played with Barcelona this year. With such a “golden reserve”, Mourinho can look to the future with optimism. And even make jokes about the opponent ...
Statistics also speak in favor of the hosts. Twice the Spanish giants faced off in the European semi-finals, in 1960 and 2002, and both confrontations ended in favor of Madrid. Real Madrid, in the end, took the main trophy to their hands: in the first case, the Champions Cup, in the second, the Champions League.
If Real Madrid does the same, Mourinho will become the first manager in the world to win the Champions League with three different teams. Guardiola, as you understand, will try to prevent this. Trying very hard...
Being able to set and achieve goals is a very good quality for a person. Sometimes this is what talented, smart potential individuals lack in order to achieve success and fulfill their plans. Everything is there, but there is no perseverance, firmness and patience. In such cases, it is the support of loved ones that helps not to give up, but to work to achieve success.
Modern society is geared towards success. Children from the first years of life are taught on programs early development, later they are given to various courses that develop skills, teach critical thinking, and so on. Being a smart, erudite, successful person is good and right, and you need to work on it. The main thing in this race is to teach the child to be a person who knows how to love, respect, make friends, appreciate other people and their work.
There is a popular saying “the end justifies the means”, which is quite widely used in the world. Competition at school, institute, work is not always fair and open. Children will encounter this and here it is important:
- Prepare them for the fact that not everyone will act honestly, the solution of the situation will not always be fair. Let the kids know about it.
- Help to be strong so as not to switch to the methods and strategies of this sinful world, for the sake of your victory. Do not sacrifice friendship, fidelity, your principles, relationships with loved ones and relationships with God, but on the contrary - protect it with all your might.
There is a good example from the Bible - King David. He was told through a prophet that he would be king. Time passed, and David not only did not become a king, he was not even an ordinary shepherd, he is a fugitive who is hiding from the current king Saul. The whole situation is unfair to David. David cannot be blamed for infidelity or non-initiation; he is a good and faithful warrior. Saul's attacks are unfair, David's position is unfair. And in this difficult, both emotionally and physically, David has the opportunity to take revenge on King Saul, to answer fairly and enter into his own, which God has prepared for him. But for this you need to kill King Saul. With all the desire and all the open possibilities, David makes a decision that will not allow him to cross his principles, will not allow him to grieve God. He leaves King Saul alive and waits for a solution to this situation from God. It is necessary to explain to children that even when they are faced with difficult situations, sometimes there will be a way out that is not from God. In this case, you just need to be firm and strong and wait for God's way out.
- To help children set the first and main goal of their lives - to please God. All your goals and methods, and desires to check this parameter. Does what I do please God? Do the methods, thoughts and motives with which I do this please God? So it will be easier for the child, and even for the adult, to keep the course of his life correctly. When we learn to measure everything by the Word of God, then God Himself will lead us to a spacious place, give us success, help, strengthen and give us strength.
And, although this seems like a fairly adult topic, the same problems happen to children at an early age. Turn the blame on a brother or sister so that they are not punished; write off the assignment to get a good grade; to take something away from another, so that you yourself would be cheerful and joyful.
We need to help and inspire children to set goals for themselves. Help and support them in achieving these goals. Teach the kids that no matter how big the goal, the methods to achieve it should not be contrary to God's Word. Reaching heights, it is important not to lose friendship, trust, mercy, relationships with God and people.
I bring to your attention a story called “The main thing is to do it! And the rest is nonsense!
Happy viewing. Peace, love and wisdom from God in everything.
"In war, all means are good."
Based on the works of F.M. Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment and Vasil Bykov's Sotnikov.
Direction "Aims and means".
Often, when discussing the permissibility of any methods, people say the phrase: "In war, all means are good." But is it possible to say so?
The question immediately arises, what kind of war is meant? War in its usual sense - an armed confrontation between states? But war can also be bloodless.
Our experts can check your essay according to the USE criteria
Site experts Kritika24.ru
Teachers of leading schools and current experts of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation.
It is known from history that there was a "cold war" - a stubborn struggle of ideologies. Therefore, war is a confrontation, a fierce struggle of opponents. That is, for victory, all means are good, in other words, the end justifies the means.
Imagine we are asking this question famous writers, one of the most intelligent and educated representatives of society. Of course, they are no longer alive, but they speak to us through their books. F.M. Dostoevsky in the novel "Crime and Punishment" speaks of the fallacy of such statements. It shows the image of a person who believed that the end justifies the means. Rodion Raskolnikov claims that he has the right to kill, since great people stop at nothing to achieve their goal, and he no doubt considers himself to be such great people. But having committed a crime, he retreats from his goal - he hides the stolen goods on the street without touching a penny. He almost hates his mother and sister, who were previously dearly loved, for the sake of which (as he believes) he even goes to murder. In fact, he barely wants to prove to himself that he is not "a trembling creature, but I have the right." Why does he change so much after the murder? In my opinion, his psyche, his soul, was damaged. Rodion, crying in a dream because a horse was killed in his presence, cold-bloodedly kills an old pawnbroker in order to achieve a goal, moreover, he kills her sister just as a witness. By the end of the novel, Raskolnikov already understands the immorality of his goal and turns to God to atone for sins.
The writer Vasil Bykov in the story "Sotnikov" says the same thing as Dostoevsky. Fisherman, main character, lead, passionately wants to survive. He uses any means for this, does not stop at betrayal, or even before knocking the bench out from under the hanged Sotnikov. And what? After everything he has done, he wants to return, fix everything, but there is no turning back. Realizing that everyone turned away from him, Rybak, who committed all the crimes for the sake of own life, wants to interrupt it - hang himself.
Thus, the general thought of the writers can be expressed in the words of Ivan Karamazov: "No human happiness is worth one tear of a child." That is, many writers considered the phrase “In war, all means are good” to be incorrect.
From my little life experience I know that people who have used unworthy means often do not reach the goal, or, having reached it, are tormented by conscience. For example, young women who incline a loved one to destroy the family or betrayal are unhappy in love. I find confirmation of my thoughts in the literature. Katherine, "Lady Macbeth Mtsensk district"In order to ensure complete and unbroken happiness with her beloved, she kills innocent people, but her lover goes to another woman. Katerina from A.N. Ostrovsky's drama "Thunderstorm" cheated on her husband for the sake of forbidden love, but abandoned by the cowardly Boris This series can be continued for a long time, but I will generalize: traitors are not loved by those who were betrayed, nor by those for whom they betrayed.The end does not justify the means.
Consequently, the expression "in war, all means are good" is immoral, and it is used in an effort to justify unseemly actions.
Updated: 2017-11-29
Attention!
Thank you for your attention.
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and press Ctrl+Enter.
Thus, you will provide invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.
Introduction: What can be worse than war for humanity? Of course, both natural disasters and epidemics are terrible, but they do not depend on human will. War is the concentration of hatred and anger in the people, their destructive outburst. How much grief and tears it brings, how many human lives it takes, how many destinies it destroys!
It is terrible that innocent people, civilians and children are dying. Our people had to endure many wars, but the First World War, Civil War and Second World War were especially destructive and cruel. world war. Many writers, both Russian and foreign, addressed this topic. They condemn the war, its stinking breath, they talk about its perniciousness. But it also happens, as in a patriotic war - an enemy has come, you need to defend your homeland. War is inevitable. Are all means good? What is possible in war, what is not?
Arguments: Leo Tolstoy in the epic story "War and Peace" shows illusory military glory. Andrei Bolkonsky, having come into contact with the abomination of war, understands its inhumanity. As a person with high moral principles, he considers not every means justified. Napoleon, on the other hand, goes to glory, covering the road with the corpses of soldiers.
Tragic moment from civil war pulled out by Mikhail Sholokhov. Ilya Bunchuk seeks to defeat the bourgeoisie at any cost, believing that in war all means are good. His reprisals against the opponents of the revolution are extremely cruel. But the price turned out to be too expensive for him - Ilya lost his mind. The highest value on earth is human life. The death of a person is equivalent to the death of the whole universe. You can not take the life of your own kind and remain without punishment.
War awakens and brings out the low human feelings, the animal fear of death often becomes the cause of betrayal and betrayal. A striking example this Aleksey Shvabrin from The Captain's Daughter by Pushkin. The fear of death makes him a traitor, there is nothing left in him worthy of the title of a nobleman and just a man.
Unnecessarily, the United States detonated nuclear bombs over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki to assert their positions. Many civilians were killed, including children. There is no justification for this kind of warfare; nothing threatened the life of the American people. This is just a sadistic reprisal of the winner over the vanquished, the strong over the weak.
Great Patriotic War the Soviet people with Nazi Germany left us horrendous welts and scars as a memory of how horrific the means of warfare can be. Mass extermination population, concentration camps, burned villages, young people taken prisoner, looting and violence - these are the means. Who will return the ruined lives of young people, will collect the shed tears of widows, mothers, orphans? Who has the power to do this? AT Soviet army reprisals against the civilian population, looting were forbidden, there was a high military discipline. For me personally, this is a sign of moral and ethical superiority.
Conclusion: There are inevitable wars when our consent is not asked. Often our people had to wage wars of liberation, and the main thing in war is to be able to remain human. Massacres against the civilian population, especially cruel methods of conducting military operations are unacceptable. Above all, human life should be valued.
