Piskarevsky 47 hospital transport city. Northwestern State Medical University named after. I. Mechnikov (Hospital named after Peter the Great). Idea and implementation

In 1903, at a meeting of the City Duma, it was decided to build a hospital for the 200th anniversary of the city and call it “in memory of the founder of the city” the Peter the Great Hospital. The place for it was chosen near the current Piskarevsky Prospekt.

According to the results of an architectural competition announced in 1906, the winner was the hospital project proposed by engineers L.A. Ilyin, A.I. Klein and A.V. Rosenberg in collaboration with the architect P.Yu. Syuzor. But even after this, the project was finalized for several more years. L.A. Ilyin traveled to the best hospitals in Europe to borrow best practices. As a result, a final project was developed that included the construction of 16 two- and three-story pavilion buildings with 2,000 beds. The buildings were designed in the “Dutch style” and were reminiscent of St. Petersburg in the era of Peter the Great.

Construction of a hospital named after. Peter the Great began in 1907. Three years later, on May 30 (17), 1910, the groundbreaking ceremony for the hospital took place, which was attended by Empress Alexandra Feodorovna and the Grand Dukes. By the beginning of the First World War, 6 pavilions with 600 beds for therapeutic patients were erected and the foundations of another 15 pavilions were laid. After the outbreak of hostilities, the hospital was adapted to receive the wounded. By 1917 it had about 1,500 beds. Cholera, typhoid and typhoid departments began to operate.

After the revolution, the hospital was named after the outstanding biologist Ilya Ilyich Mechnikov, but this renaming did not save the hospital from closure in 1919-1924 due to the lack of resources to maintain its functioning.

Since 1922, the Mechnikov hospital began to be revived under the leadership of surgeon Vladimir Andreevich Oppel. Under him, new departments appeared: a surgical department, a department of nervous diseases, a urology department, an oncology department, etc. By 1929, the hospital became the largest medical institution in the country with 2,000 beds. The hospital had a subsidiary farm with a pigsty, a greenhouse, a cowshed, a greenhouse, a stable, a vegetable storehouse and an apiary. The city said that the only thing that was not implemented from the original hospital design was a system of underground passages connecting all the buildings.

During the Great Patriotic War On the basis of the hospital, an evacuation hospital SEG 222v with 1250 beds was organized.

After the war, the Mechnikovskaya Hospital continued to be the central multidisciplinary city hospital. People called it the “Almshouse.”

In 1994, one of the largest hospitals in the city was returned to its historical name, which, however, did not affect the quality of service in this one of the largest medical institutions in St. Petersburg.

• • Quality of treatment 1
  • Attitude of the medical staff 1
  • Medical equipment 1
  • Price-quality ratio 1
  • Comfort and cleanliness 1

  In October 2018, my wife, 59 years old, came to the MAPO clinic on Kirochnaya Street for open heart surgery. She was a person full of strength and energy, she worked, drove a car, swam in the pool. She had no significant clinical manifestations from the heart. What happened next is simply impossible for any sane person to understand. I believe that the doctors, if you can call them that, committed ***** Let me explain.

  The mitral valve plastic surgery was performed by cardiac surgeon Kuznetsov together with M. Dewar (USA). It was fulfilled according to quota and was planned. During the operation or immediately after it, severe complications arose in the form of multiple organ failure and rhabdomyolysis - a disease in which all the muscles of the body “burn out”. Kuznetsov assured me and my loved ones that the operation went well.

  What's the matter? The curator and main “ideologist” of treatment, Lebedinsky, and the head of the intensive care unit, Vanyushkin, begin to explain these complications by a genetic factor and the body’s autoimmune response. and without any evidence; saying, at the same time, that they themselves do not understand this (these are people who consider themselves professionals). By the way, after the death of the patient, a genetic analysis came, ordered by the persons already named. It turned out to be absolutely normal, although I understand that only one of them was offered possible options, if it is appropriate, in general, to talk about genetics here. It is most likely impossible to confirm or refute this factor at this level of knowledge. But it’s clear that this “screen” can cover up anything: malfunction of equipment, flagrant unprofessionalism of staff, negligence, etc. Moreover, the patient’s father is already 93 years old, his mother died at 87, alone my paternal uncle died at 96, the other is now 91. This is about the issue of genetics. And why should I and my family believe this? To remove responsibility from the staff?

  But even if we assume that yes, genetics are “to blame”, mutations of some genes have occurred, then all further treatment cannot be called anything other than mockery of the patient, common sense and logic. During the month and a half that she lay in the ward, her body was swollen and yellowed, she was unable to move her arms, legs, or head, the temperature, with the exception of 2-3 days, was 38-39 degrees or higher, All the time there was hospital-acquired pneumonia circulating in the ward. Although the doctors claimed that she was conscious, this was a blatant lie. Our multiple visits did not confirm this; she did not react to us in any way. If there was any consciousness, it was very, very confused, which most likely means a violation of the oxygen regime either during the operation or immediately after it. The patient's condition, again with the exception of 2-3 days, was constantly deteriorating; no restoration of organs (in particular, kidneys and lungs), which the doctors promised, did not occur. In response to my repeated demands to remove the fever and give, at the suggestion of the same Lebedinsky and Vanyushkin, penta-globulin, it was said that it was necessary to convene a consultation. But it was already too late. My wife is gone. When asked why this drug was not given, Vanyushkin replied: “It’s expensive.” And this despite the fact that all standards and regulations for the treatment of pneumonia are prescribed by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; all this should have been known to this personnel. This is their direct responsibility. In the end, if you yourself don’t understand, contact other specialists, which is what I insisted on. After all, we are talking about human life! What, there are no specialists in St. Petersburg who understand this better than you and your clinical pharmacologists? But no. Pride, and simply banal “not giving a damn” did not allow this.

  That's why I call everything that happened intentional ****. I think it’s impossible to call it any other way. I believe that the death of the patient is solely on the conscience of all these individuals: Kuznetsov, Lebedinsky and Vanyushkin.

  Blatant unprofessionalism, baseless snobbery (our opinion and our treatment are the most correct), mutual responsibility (if today you rat me out, then tomorrow I’ll rat you out), veneration for rank (“this one is a professor, and I’m an associate professor”) , lies, demagoguery and impunity - that’s far from full list what I observed and what reigns in this clinic and this ward. All this “treatment” resembled the action of a bull in a china shop.

  No independent experts were allowed into the chamber. In particular, in response to my requests to bring for consultation an academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences from the First Med. Institute, I heard from Lebedinsky: “He is a dishonest person. If he comes, he will say that everything was wrong from the very beginning (which, obviously, was so, judging by the result). And then I wash my hands of it and take it off my hands any responsibility." These are the words of a man who took the Hippocratic oath. And what responsibility did he bear? At least moral? No. How can one treat this, and everything described above? These people, who also teach students, can be called doctors? Can they continue to remain in this profession and build a career? In my opinion, these people cannot evoke anything but contempt.

  Yes, formally, the patient did a lot of work, fussed about, seemed to be paying attention to her (again, according to the staff), there were constant telephone conversations with the doctors - no one denies this. But all this fuss only led to her death.

  It should also be said that this is far from the only case of such “treatment” in this ward over the past year and a half. I already know about at least one criminal case initiated based on the crime of its employees, quite similar to this one. I also know about a case very close to this, and exactly with these personnel, when the indignation of the relatives of the deceased knew no bounds. That is, there is a treatment system inherent in this clinic. If these people treated anyone, then, apparently, it was in situations where it was simply impossible not to do so.

  I want to warn those who are going to be treated in it: you are in mortal danger. Pass this on to all your loved ones and acquaintances, tell them on social networks. Otherwise, all the outrages happening in this clinic will continue.

• • Quality of treatment 5
  • Attitude of the medical staff 5
  • Promptness of receiving medical care 5
  • Medical equipment 5
  • Price-quality ratio 5
  • Comfort and cleanliness 5

  In March of this year, our mother was admitted to the Botkin Hospital on Piskarevsky
  Ave. 49.
  They put me in an ambulance under compulsory medical insurance. Diagnosis of acute respiratory viral infection with suspected pneumonia.
  After all the horror stories that you usually hear about Botkin’s hospital, we were pleasantly surprised that everything was completely different.
  Excellent modern hospital.
  Double room, with shower and toilet.
  We would like to express our deep gratitude to all the staff of the 8th department, and especially to our attending physician Olga Vladimirovna. This is a caring and attentive person. All nurses and aides are friendly and always ready to help an elderly person.
  

• • Quality of treatment 1
  • Attitude of the medical staff 1
  • Promptness of receiving medical care 4
  • Medical equipment 3
  • Price-quality ratio 1
  • Comfort and cleanliness 3

  Hello! I am writing to warn everyone against ending up in this TERRIBLE hospital, where they did it in such a way that my dear grandmother eventually died! I'll explain why this opinion is true! On November 14, 2016, my grandmother was brought to this ill-fated hospital with a massive heart attack (during the first 1.5-2 hours after the attack). I was admitted to the intensive care unit of the 16th cardiology department. There the doctor said that it was necessary to do caronary angiography, without explaining the contraindications! He said there was no big risk. We thought about it, but agreed, and after a few days it turned out that this procedure had many specific contraindications that my grandmother had (DOCTORS KNEW ALL THIS). For two days my grandmother was in intensive care... her condition was called stable and serious. On the 3rd day (Wednesday) she was transferred to the cardiology department and NO ONE called her family, although all the phones were there. The person needed care, but they simply threw her on the bed in the ward and left. All we had to do was call in advance and we would come, then hire a 24-hour nurse if necessary. But the doctors thought otherwise... the result: the grandmother had a severe fall when trying to get out of bed without supervision, which the doctors and nurses kept silent about. We learned about this fact from patients. That day, my mother called the intensive care unit, and they informed me that grandma had already been in the department for several hours. Mom arrived and saw that her condition had worsened sharply compared to when she was admitted to the hospital. The grandmother’s speech was severely impaired, she moved poorly and there were obvious brain disorders similar to a stroke. However, no one diagnosed a stroke or even checked his head, judging by the extract. Then, the next day, the granny was again transferred to the intensive care unit, ALLEGEDLY only for the weekend due to the fact that there were not enough people in the department and they would not be able to care for her (the doctors knew about the possibility of a nurse). But in the intensive care unit of the therapeutic department, with a massive heart attack complicated by diabetes mellitus. On Monday, no one transferred my grandmother to the department, and she was kept in the intensive care unit, where she was admitted only once. The condition was always assessed as stable and serious...they didn’t say anything special. And so in intensive care, instead of several days (transfer on Thursday and until Monday they promised), she lay there for 7 days and then they told us that they say take it away... we are discharged. We were shocked, not understanding, because every day there was only one answer about the condition being “stable and serious.” With difficulty, my mother persuaded the intensive care doctor to treat my grandmother for a couple more days. As a result, judging by the extract, no one treated me for these couple of days. ..just held it. As it turned out, the head of cardiology has this practice: transferring patients in serious condition from their department, supposedly for the weekend, to a non-core therapeutic intensive care unit! And then you won’t be able to take it back. This doctor from cardiology said just that: no one will take her to the department, no one will look after her and treat her... there are no places (they say if you want, we’ll throw her in the corridor on the bed). AS A RESULT, a person in serious condition is discharged from the intensive care unit IMMEDIATELY HOME. The condition after their treatment only got worse; most likely the grandmother was not even fed there and it is not known how she was treated. We were kept in the hospital for only 12 days, and then only for the last couple of days thanks to the head of intensive care therapy. They were discharged home in a terrible condition, but on the discharge note they wrote (attention!), the condition is “satisfactory” (the doctors or your family would like it to be so satisfactory) and is discharged to the clinic. By the way, the extract does not say that the person spent almost all the time not in cardiology, but in therapy. The discharge and tests are all good, and the ECG is also supposedly normal in dynamics. But in fact, a man who walked on his own feet to the hospital, thought well for an 86-year-old, came home nothing (lying and sleeping, with impaired speech and almost no strength). The next day we call an ambulance, because we realized that everything in the statement is a lie. The emergency doctors determine atrial fibrillation on the ECG, blood sugar is 26 (although supposedly everything was okay in the hospital), low = 70 hemoglobin (although everything is perfect according to the tests in the discharge). They are hospitalized in another hospital, where the doctor directly says that the condition is serious and even deplorable (despite the fact that in the cardiology of Peter the Great it is considered satisfactory)! We fought in that hospital for 2 weeks...after my grandmother passed away. I believe that the blame lies largely with the Peter the Great Hospital, especially with the head of the 16th cardiology department. SHE acted inhumanely and cruelly, which ultimately led to the death of a person dear to us.

• • Quality of treatment 5
  • Attitude of the medical staff 5
  • Promptness of receiving medical care 5
  • Medical equipment 5
  • Price-quality ratio 5
  • Comfort and cleanliness 5

  I thank all the staff of the gynecological department of the St. Petersburg Mechnikov Hospital (Peter the Great Clinic) for their friendly attitude and effective treatment. The order established in the department is maximally adapted for the comfort of patients, right down to such details as a pack of washing powder in the toilet, on the table near the buffet there are kettles with boiled water, boiling water and tea leaves.
  The department is very clean. I saw that they wrote on the Internet that you couldn’t go to the toilet, there was nowhere to step, it was dirty. Unfortunately, not everyone is accustomed to cleaning up after themselves; some leave terrible dirt, although there are mops and cloths in the toilets and showers, there is a washing tank, and cleaning up after yourself is not difficult.
  About the quality of treatment. The doctors are very attentive, aware of how each of their patients is doing, and when meeting in the corridor, can ask a specific question about signs of recovery or answer any specific question without holding a medical history in their hands. They really keep in mind the treatment of each ward. In this case, recovery occurs quickly, enhanced, if necessary, by additional procedures. Physiotherapy also helps with recovery. I had two attending physicians - Konstantin Sergeevich Churkin, who introduced himself to me immediately after the examination as a professor-surgeon, and Yulia Evgenievna Gavrish, to whom he transferred my treatment and introduced us to each other. And after the “transfer” for some time he was interested in how I was doing. Both are very competent and attentive, as I can judge from the answers to my questions and advice on how best to act. The operation was performed by Professor Dina Fedorovna Kostyuchek, a most pleasant, optimistic woman who encouraged her with her communication.
  The greatest amount of communication occurs with nurses. They solve many issues that may arise unexpectedly and skillfully perform their work. For example, they give excellent injections, and take blood from a vein much more deftly than usual in clinics. They are exceptionally friendly, always willing to respond to requests, even if they had to ask late at night.
  Nurse Lyudmila Vasilyevna accompanies the operation. The day before, she comes and tells you what you need to take with you and how to prepare. The fact that a familiar person takes you to the operation, and does not take you on a gurney, wrapped in a sheet, has a calming effect. She accompanies you all the way to the operating table and places you on it. Then the anesthesiologist comes up. The anesthesia was good, from which I came out easily - there was only drowsiness. I didn’t have time to find out the name of the anesthesiologist - I passed out .
  The food in the hospital is hearty and tasty - roast meat, cottage cheese casserole, chicken casserole and other main courses, delicious soups, delicious porridge. I would like to repeat the same dishes at home. There are two friendly women handing out food, so kind and generous that I worried about gaining weight. They are happy to deliver food to the wards, make sure that no one misses or goes hungry, and are happy when they like the dishes offered. (The guest book of the hospital's catering department is full of gratitude).
  Don't think that I'm writing this review to order. I just checked out and am happy with the results. I saw such terrible reviews on the Internet that at first I was even afraid to go to this hospital. But one woman on the selection committee said that she had already been there and was only going back there a second time. This convinced me, and now I also say the same thing - if something suddenly happens, then go to the Mechnikov hospital. Therefore, I am writing a review and my opinion for the sake of objectivity.
  I also saw complaints on the Internet about emergency admissions. One night in the hospital there were many doctors, interns, graduates of the medical academy - no less than during the day, if not more. Many new patients appeared, all of them were not taken care of in the wards, they were also lying in the corridor. The medical staff walked around them all night, until the morning, inserting IVs, questioning them, and treating them. It is difficult to imagine that with such activity someone was not helped.
  I am grateful to all the employees of the gynecological department, headed by the head Victoria Anatolyevna Pechenikova, who more than once examined everyone in her department, and was no less aware of the treatment than the attending physicians. She created a friendly atmosphere. In the mornings, sick people and medical staff coming to work greeted each other. Thank you for your attentive and humane attitude!
  

• • Quality of treatment 3
  • Attitude of the medical staff 3
  • Promptness of receiving medical care 5
  • Medical equipment 5
  • Price-quality ratio 5
  • Comfort and cleanliness 3

  In the summer of 2016, she was treated in the gynecological department with a diagnosis of endometrial polyp and was hospitalized for hysteroscopy. There is something to compare with, because... 1.5 years earlier, with a similar diagnosis, she was treated at the City Hospital on Dynamo (like No. 31).
  What I liked: impressive equipment in the operating room, high-quality anesthesia, the presence of a ward in the operating room for “recovery” from anesthesia.
  I didn’t like it: from the household amenities - one shower and toilet per department. From the rest, there is a clear feeling that you are on a conveyor belt, the examination is organized like this: they gather the entire crowd near the examination room, then they call according to the list to the examination room, where there are 2 chairs and you are treated accordingly in the direct presence of another patient. But this is not the most interesting thing - in order to get into the examination room, you need to undress, and right in the corridor, where everyone who is not too lazy walks around, including visitors. Just in case, they put a small screen at the door, but you still feel like you’re in a shop window. The only desire that arose for me after such an inspection was to escape from there. There should be at least basic respect for patients, and treatment like meat.
  Regarding the quality of treatment: upon discharge they did not make any appointments - they said go to the residential complex and let them treat you there, although in the absence of proper postoperative treatment there will be a relapse (which is what happened to me after Dynamo). After the next control ultrasound, the doctor discovered that one of the ovaries was located too close to the uterus, and suggested that this was an adhesion that arose during treatment with hysteroscopy. It is possible that this arose after GB No. 31, but ultrasound specialists did not tell me about this before...
  If you choose between GB No. 31 and Mechnikov, I would definitely choose Mechnikov, because their main disadvantages in everyday life. But if I have another choice, I would prefer another clinic.
  I was treated under voluntary medical insurance and was scheduled for surgery as soon as my cycle allowed. I don’t know how much it costs, the insurance company paid, so I gave it a 5 in the assessment.
  Doctor - I don’t remember the exact last name, he was young, the last name was similar to Churin or something similar.
  I’ll write a complaint through the Ministry of Health website - let them do something about the organization of patient care, because this is not just disrespect, but also a violation of the law on medical confidentiality.

If you are an official representative of the clinic and want to be able to comment on reviews of your clinic, leave a request, we will contact you and tell you how to do this